CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 1CVE-2021-44533 – nodejs: Incorrect handling of certificate subject and issuer fields
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44533
Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 did not handle multi-value Relative Distinguished Names correctly. Attackers could craft certificate subjects containing a single-value Relative Distinguished Name that would be interpreted as a multi-value Relative Distinguished Name, for example, in order to inject a Common Name that would allow bypassing the certificate subject verification.Affected versions of Node.js that do not accept multi-value Relative Distinguished Names and are thus not vulnerable to such attacks themselves. However, third-party code that uses node's ambiguous presentation of certificate subjects may be vulnerable. Node.js versiones anteriores a 12.22.9, versiones anteriores a 14.18.3, versiones anteriores a 16.13.2, y versiones anteriores a 17.3.1, no manejaba correctamente los Nombres Distinguidos Relativos de varios valores. Los atacantes podrían diseñar sujetos de certificados que contengan un Nombre Distinguido Relativo de un solo valor que sería interpretado como un Nombre Distinguido Relativo de varios valores, por ejemplo, para inyectar un Nombre Común que permitiría omitir la verificación del sujeto del certificado. • https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694 https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/jan-2022-security-releases https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220325-0007 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5170 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-44533 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040856 • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 1CVE-2021-44532 – nodejs: Certificate Verification Bypass via String Injection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44532
Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 converts SANs (Subject Alternative Names) to a string format. It uses this string to check peer certificates against hostnames when validating connections. The string format was subject to an injection vulnerability when name constraints were used within a certificate chain, allowing the bypass of these name constraints.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this escape SANs containing the problematic characters in order to prevent the injection. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option. Node.js versiones anteriores a 12.22.9, versiones anteriores a 14.18.3, versiones anteriores a 16.13.2 y versiones anteriores a 17.3.1, convierte los SAN (Subject Alternative Names) a un formato de cadena. usa esta cadena para comprobar los certificados de los compañeros con los nombres de host cuando comprueba las conexiones. • https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694 https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/jan-2022-security-releases https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220325-0007 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5170 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-44532 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040846 • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation CWE-296: Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 15EXPL: 0CVE-2021-44531 – nodejs: Improper handling of URI Subject Alternative Names
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44531
Accepting arbitrary Subject Alternative Name (SAN) types, unless a PKI is specifically defined to use a particular SAN type, can result in bypassing name-constrained intermediates. Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 was accepting URI SAN types, which PKIs are often not defined to use. Additionally, when a protocol allows URI SANs, Node.js did not match the URI correctly.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this disable the URI SAN type when checking a certificate against a hostname. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option. Aceptar tipos de nombres alternativos de sujeto (SAN) arbitrarios, a menos que una PKI esté definida específicamente para usar un tipo de SAN concreto, puede resultar en una omisión de los intermediarios con restricción de nombre. • https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694 https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/jan-2022-security-releases https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220325-0007 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5170 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-44531 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040839 • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •
CVSS: 8.2EPSS: 1%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0CVE-2022-21824 – nodejs: Prototype pollution via console.table properties
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-21824
Due to the formatting logic of the "console.table()" function it was not safe to allow user controlled input to be passed to the "properties" parameter while simultaneously passing a plain object with at least one property as the first parameter, which could be "__proto__". The prototype pollution has very limited control, in that it only allows an empty string to be assigned to numerical keys of the object prototype.Node.js >= 12.22.9, >= 14.18.3, >= 16.13.2, and >= 17.3.1 use a null protoype for the object these properties are being assigned to. Debido a la lógica de formato de la función "console.table()" no era seguro permitir que pasara la entrada controlada por el usuario al parámetro "properties" mientras pasaba simultáneamente un objeto plano con al menos una propiedad como primer parámetro, que podía ser "__proto__". La contaminación del prototipo presenta un control muy limitado, ya que sólo permite asignar una cadena vacía a las claves numéricas del prototipo del objeto.Node.js versiones posteriores a 12.22.9 incluyéndola, versiones posteriores a 14.18.3 incluyéndola, versiones posteriores a 16.13.2 incluyéndola, y versiones posteriores a 17.3.1 incluyéndola, usan un prototipo nulo para el objeto al que es asignada estas propiedades. • https://hackerone.com/reports/1431042 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00006.html https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/jan-2022-security-releases https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220325-0007 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220729-0004 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5170 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-2 • CWE-471: Modification of Assumed-Immutable Data (MAID) CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 28EXPL: 0CVE-2021-4044 – Invalid handling of X509_verify_cert() internal errors in libssl
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-4044
Internally libssl in OpenSSL calls X509_verify_cert() on the client side to verify a certificate supplied by a server. That function may return a negative return value to indicate an internal error (for example out of memory). Such a negative return value is mishandled by OpenSSL and will cause an IO function (such as SSL_connect() or SSL_do_handshake()) to not indicate success and a subsequent call to SSL_get_error() to return the value SSL_ERROR_WANT_RETRY_VERIFY. This return value is only supposed to be returned by OpenSSL if the application has previously called SSL_CTX_set_cert_verify_callback(). Since most applications do not do this the SSL_ERROR_WANT_RETRY_VERIFY return value from SSL_get_error() will be totally unexpected and applications may not behave correctly as a result. • https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=758754966791c537ea95241438454aa86f91f256 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20211229-0003 https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20211214.txt • CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') •