Page 11 of 366 results (0.013 seconds)

CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0

An issue was discovered in the proc_pid_stack function in fs/proc/base.c in the Linux kernel through 4.18.11. It does not ensure that only root may inspect the kernel stack of an arbitrary task, allowing a local attacker to exploit racy stack unwinding and leak kernel task stack contents. Se descubrió un problema en la función proc_pid_stack en fs/proc/base.c en el kernel de Linux hasta la versión 4.18.11. No asegura que solo root pueda inspeccionar la pila del kernel de una tarea arbitraria, lo que permite que un atacante local explote de forma arbitraria el proceso de marcha atrás en la pila a la hora de producirse una excepción (stack unwinding) y filtre el contenido de la pila de tareas del kernel. An issue was discovered in the proc_pid_stack function in fs/proc/base.c in the Linux kernel. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00043.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105525 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0512 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0514 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0831 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2473 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/03/msg00017.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/03/msg00034.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-ann • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0

In Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files to the builtin PDF14 converter could use a use-after-free in copydevice handling to crash the interpreter or possibly have unspecified other impact. En Artifex Ghostscript en versiones anteriores a la 9.24, los atacantes que puedan proporcionar archivos PostScript manipulados al convertidor PDF14 integrado podrían emplear un uso de memoria previamente liberada en el manejo de copydevice para provocar el cierre inesperado del intérprete u otro tipo de impacto sin especificar. It was discovered that the ghostscript PDF14 compositor did not properly handle the copying of a device. An attacker could possibly exploit this to bypass the -dSAFER protection and crash ghostscript or, possibly, execute arbitrary code in the ghostscript context via a specially crafted PostScript document. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=c432131c3fdb2143e148e8ba88555f7f7a63b25e https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0327 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0229 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699661 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00015.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-12 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3768-1 https://www.artifex.com/news/ghostscript-security-resolved https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4 • CWE-416: Use After Free •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 2%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0

mod_perl 2.0 through 2.0.10 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Perl code by placing it in a user-owned .htaccess file, because (contrary to the documentation) there is no configuration option that permits Perl code for the administrator's control of HTTP request processing without also permitting unprivileged users to run Perl code in the context of the user account that runs Apache HTTP Server processes. mod_perl 2.0 hasta la versión 2.0.10 permite que los atacantes ejecuten código Perl colocándolo en un archivo .htaccess propiedad del usuario, debido a que (al contrario de lo que pone en la documentación) no hay una opción de configuración que permita el código Perl para el control de administrador del procesamiento de peticiones HTTP sin permitir también que usuarios sin privilegios ejecuten código Perl en el contexto de la cuenta de usuario que ejecuta los procesos Apache HTTP Server. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00063.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00065.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105195 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2737 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2825 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2826 https://bugs.debian.org/644169 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c8ebe8aad147a3ad2e7b0e8b2da45263171ab5d0fc7f8c100feaa94d%40%3Cmodperl-cvs.perl.apache.org%3E https://li • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') CWE-266: Incorrect Privilege Assignment •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 152EXPL: 0

The Linux kernel, versions 3.9+, is vulnerable to a denial of service attack with low rates of specially modified packets targeting IP fragment re-assembly. An attacker may cause a denial of service condition by sending specially crafted IP fragments. Various vulnerabilities in IP fragmentation have been discovered and fixed over the years. The current vulnerability (CVE-2018-5391) became exploitable in the Linux kernel with the increase of the IP fragment reassembly queue size. El kernel de Linux en versiones a partir de la 3.9 es vulnerable a un ataque de denegación de servicio (DoS) con tasas bajas de paquetes especialmente modificados que apuntan hacia el reensamblado de fragmentos de IP. • http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2018-004.txt http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20200115-01-linux-en http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/4 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105108 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041476 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041637 https://access.redhat.co • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 74%CPEs: 127EXPL: 0

Linux kernel versions 4.9+ can be forced to make very expensive calls to tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() and tcp_prune_ofo_queue() for every incoming packet which can lead to a denial of service. El kernel de Linux en versiones 4.9 y siguientes pueden forzarse a realizar llamadas muy caras a tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() y tcp_prune_ofo_queue() para cada paquete entrante, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. A flaw named SegmentSmack was found in the way the Linux kernel handled specially crafted TCP packets. A remote attacker could use this flaw to trigger time and calculation expensive calls to tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() and tcp_prune_ofo_queue() functions by sending specially modified packets within ongoing TCP sessions which could lead to a CPU saturation and hence a denial of service on the system. Maintaining the denial of service condition requires continuous two-way TCP sessions to a reachable open port, thus the attacks cannot be performed using spoofed IP addresses. • http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2018-004.txt http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20181031-02-linux-en http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/4 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104976 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041424 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041434 https://access.redhat.co • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •