CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 1CVE-2016-1000229 – swagger-ui: cross-site scripting in key names
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-1000229
swagger-ui has XSS in key names swagger-ui presenta una vulnerabilidad de tipo XSS en nombres claves. It was found that swagger-ui contains a cross site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the key names in the JSON document. An attacker could use this flaw to supply a key name with script tags which could cause arbitrary code execution. Additionally it is possible to load the arbitrary JSON files remotely via the URL query-string parameter. • https://github.com/ossf-cve-benchmark/CVE-2016-1000229 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97580 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0868 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-1000229 https://raw.githubusercontent.com/distributedweaknessfiling/cvelist/master/2016/1000xxx/CVE-2016-1000229.json https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-1000229 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360275 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 4EXPL: 5CVE-2016-4437 – Apache Shiro Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4437
Apache Shiro before 1.2.5, when a cipher key has not been configured for the "remember me" feature, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or bypass intended access restrictions via an unspecified request parameter. Apache Shiro en versiones anteriores a 1.2.5, cuando una clave de cifrado no ha sido configurada por la característica "remember me", permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario o eludir las restricciones destinadas al acceso a través de un parámetro request no especificado. It was found that Apache Shiro uses a default cipher key for its "remember me" feature. An attacker could use this to devise a malicious request parameter and gain access to unauthorized content. Apache Shiro contains a vulnerability which may allow remote attackers to execute code or bypass intended access restrictions via an unspecified request parameter when a cipher key has not been configured for the "remember me" feature. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/48410 https://github.com/pizza-power/CVE-2016-4437 https://github.com/xk-mt/CVE-2016-4437 https://github.com/m3terpreter/CVE-2016-4437 http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/137310/Apache-Shiro-1.2.4-Information-Disclosure.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/157497/Apache-Shiro-1.2.4-Remote-Code-Execution.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2035.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2036.html http://www.securityfocus.com&# • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 2%CPEs: 19EXPL: 1CVE-2015-7501 – apache-commons-collections: InvokerTransformer code execution during deserialisation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-7501
Red Hat JBoss A-MQ 6.x; BPM Suite (BPMS) 6.x; BRMS 6.x and 5.x; Data Grid (JDG) 6.x; Data Virtualization (JDV) 6.x and 5.x; Enterprise Application Platform 6.x, 5.x, and 4.3.x; Fuse 6.x; Fuse Service Works (FSW) 6.x; Operations Network (JBoss ON) 3.x; Portal 6.x; SOA Platform (SOA-P) 5.x; Web Server (JWS) 3.x; Red Hat OpenShift/xPAAS 3.x; and Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager 1.3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the Apache Commons Collections (ACC) library. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ 6.x; BPM Suite (BPMS) 6.x; BRMS 6.x y 5.x; Data Grid (JDG) 6.x; Data Virtualization (JDV) 6.x y 5.x; Enterprise Application Platform 6.x, 5.x y 4.3.x; Fuse 6.x; Fuse Service Works (FSW) 6.x; Operations Network (JBoss ON) 3.x; Portal 6.x; SOA Platform (SOA-P) 5.x; Web Server (JWS) 3.x; Red Hat OpenShift/xPAAS 3.x y Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager 1.3 permiten que atacantes remotos ejecuten comandos arbitrarios mediante un objeto Java serializado manipulado. Esto está relacionado con la librería ACC (Apache Commons Collections). It was found that the Apache commons-collections library permitted code execution when deserializing objects involving a specially constructed chain of classes. A remote attacker could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code with the permissions of the application using the commons-collections library. • https://github.com/ianxtianxt/CVE-2015-7501 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2500.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2501.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2502.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2514.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2516.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2517.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2521.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2522.html http://rhn.redhat. • CWE-284: Improper Access Control CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2014-8175 – Fuse: insufficient access permissions checks when accessing Hawtio console
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-8175
Red Hat JBoss Fuse before 6.2.0 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended restrictions and access the HawtIO console by leveraging an account defined in the users.properties file. Red Hat JBoss Fuse anterior a 6.2.0 permite a usuarios remotos autenticados evadir las restricciones y acceder a la consola HawtIO mediante el aprovechamiento de una cuenta definida en el fichero de propiedades de usuarios. It was found that JBoss Fuse would allow any user defined in the users.properties file to access the HawtIO console without having a valid admin role. This could allow a remote attacker to bypass intended authentication HawtIO console access restrictions. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1176.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1177.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-8175 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205112 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls CWE-862: Missing Authorization •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2013-7398 – async-http-client: missing hostname verification for SSL certificates
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-7398
main/java/com/ning/http/client/AsyncHttpClientConfig.java in Async Http Client (aka AHC or async-http-client) before 1.9.0 does not require a hostname match during verification of X.509 certificates, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof HTTPS servers via an arbitrary valid certificate. main/java/com/ning/http/client/AsyncHttpClientConfig.java en Async Http Client (también conocido como AHC o async-http-client) anterior a 1.9.0 no requiere una coincidencia de nombre de anfitrión durante la verificación de los certificados X.509, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle falsificar servidores HTTPS a través de un certificado válido arbitrario. It was found that async-http-client did not verify that the server hostname matched the domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field in X.509 certificates. This could allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to spoof an SSL server if they had a certificate that was valid for any domain name. • http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/08/26/1 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0850.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0851.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1176.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1551.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/69317 https://github.com/AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client/issues/197 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ff8dcfe29377088ab655fda9d585dccd5b1f07fabd94ae84fd60a7f8%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E https://l • CWE-297: Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •