CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 74%CPEs: 56EXPL: 0CVE-2016-8735 – Apache Tomcat Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-8735
Remote code execution is possible with Apache Tomcat before 6.0.48, 7.x before 7.0.73, 8.x before 8.0.39, 8.5.x before 8.5.7, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M12 if JmxRemoteLifecycleListener is used and an attacker can reach JMX ports. The issue exists because this listener wasn't updated for consistency with the CVE-2016-3427 Oracle patch that affected credential types. La ejecución remota de código es posible con Apache Tomcat en versiones anteriores a 6.0.48, 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.73, 8.x en versiones anteriores a 8.0.39, 8.5.x en versiones anteriores a 8.5.7 y 9.x en versiones anteriores a 9.0.0.M12 si JmxRemoteLifecycleListener es utilizado y un atacante puede llegar a los puertos JMX. El problema existe porque este oyente no se actualizó por coherencia con el parche de Oracle CVE-2016-3427 que afectó a los tipos de credenciales. The JmxRemoteLifecycleListener was not updated to take account of Oracle's fix for CVE-2016-3427. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0457.html http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/502 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1767644 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1767656 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1767676 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1767684 http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html http://tomcat.apache.org/security-8.html http://tomcat.apache.org&#x • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 7.2EPSS: 1%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4978 – Artemis: Deserialization of untrusted input vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4978
The getObject method of the javax.jms.ObjectMessage class in the (1) JMS Core client, (2) Artemis broker, and (3) Artemis REST component in Apache ActiveMQ Artemis before 1.4.0 might allow remote authenticated users with permission to send messages to the Artemis broker to deserialize arbitrary objects and execute arbitrary code by leveraging gadget classes being present on the Artemis classpath. El método getObject de la clase javax.jms.ObjectMessage en el (1) cliente JMS Core, (2) broker Artemis y (3) componente Artemis REST en Apache ActiveMQ Artemis en versiones anteriores a 1.4.0 podría permitir a usuarios remotos autenticados con permiso, mandar mensajes al broker Artemis para deserializar objetos arbitrarios y ejecutar código arbitrario aprovechando clases de gadget presentes en la ruta de clases Artemis. It was found that use of a JMS ObjectMessage does not safely handle user supplied data when deserializing objects. A remote attacker could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code with the permissions of the application using a JMS ObjectMessage. • http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/activemq-users/201609.mbox/%3CCAH6wpnqzeNtpykT7emtDU1-GV7AvjFP5-YroWcCC4UZyQEFvtA%40mail.gmail.com%3E http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93142 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1834 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1835 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1836 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1837 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3454 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3455 https://access.redhat& • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4993 – eap: HTTP header injection / response splitting
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4993
CRLF injection vulnerability in the Undertow web server in WildFly 10.0.0, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 7.x before 7.0.2, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors. Vulnerabilidad de inyección CRLF en el servidor web Undertow en WildFly 10.0.0, tal como se utiliza en Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.2, permite a atacantes remotos inyectar cabeceras HTTP arbitrarias y llevar a cabo ataques de separación de respuesta HTTP a través de vectores no especificados. It was reported that EAP 7 Application Server/Undertow web server is vulnerable to the injection of arbitrary HTTP headers, and also response splitting, due to insufficient sanitization and validation of user input before the input is used as part of an HTTP header value. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1838.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1839.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1840.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1841.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92894 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036758 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3454 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3455 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3456 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017: • CWE-93: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection') CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 45EXPL: 1CVE-2016-2183 – SSL/TLS: Birthday attack against 64-bit block ciphers (SWEET32)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2183
The DES and Triple DES ciphers, as used in the TLS, SSH, and IPSec protocols and other protocols and products, have a birthday bound of approximately four billion blocks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a birthday attack against a long-duration encrypted session, as demonstrated by an HTTPS session using Triple DES in CBC mode, aka a "Sweet32" attack. Los cifrados DES y Triple DES, como se usan en los protocolos TLS, SSH e IPSec y otros protocolos y productos, tienen una cota de cumpleaños de aproximadamente cuatro mil millones de bloques, lo que facilita a atacantes remotos obtener datos de texto plano a través de un ataque de cumpleaños contra una sesión cifrada de larga duración, según lo demostrado por una sesión HTTPS usando Triple DES en modo CBC, también conocido como un ataque "Sweet32". A flaw was found in the way the DES/3DES cipher was used as part of the TLS/SSL protocol. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to recover some plaintext data by capturing large amounts of encrypted traffic between TLS/SSL server and client if the communication used a DES/3DES based ciphersuite. IBM Informix Dynamic Server suffers from dll injection, PHP code injection, and heap buffer overflow vulnerabilities. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00023.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00011.h • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0CVE-2016-3110 – mod_cluster: remotely Segfault Apache http server
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3110
mod_cluster, as used in Red Hat JBoss Web Server 2.1, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (Apache http server crash) via an MCMP message containing a series of = (equals) characters after a legitimate element. mod_cluster, tal como se utiliza en Red Hat JBoss Web Server 2.1, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída del servidor http de Apache) a través de un mensaje MCMP que contiene una serie de caracteres = (iguales) después de un elemento legítimo. It was discovered that it is possible to remotely Segfault Apache http server with a specially crafted string sent to the mod_cluster via service messages (MCMP). • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1648.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1649.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1650.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2054.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2055.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2056.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92584 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326320 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org&#x • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •