Page 11 of 183 results (0.021 seconds)

CVSS: 6.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 36EXPL: 0

GRUB2 contains a race condition in grub_script_function_create() leading to a use-after-free vulnerability which can be triggered by redefining a function whilst the same function is already executing, leading to arbitrary code execution and secure boot restriction bypass. This issue affects GRUB2 version 2.04 and prior versions. GRUB2 contiene una condición de carrera en la función grub_script_function_create() que conlleva a una vulnerabilidad de uso de la memoria previamente liberada la cual puede ser desencadenada al redefinir una función mientras la misma función ya se está ejecutando, conllevando a una ejecución de código arbitrario y a una omisión de restricción de arranque seguro. Este problema afecta a GRUB2 versiones 2.04 y versiones anteriores • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-08/msg00016.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-08/msg00017.html http://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-4432-1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/07/29/3 https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/grub2bootloader https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2020-07/msg00034.html https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/ADV200011 https://security.gentoo.org/ • CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') CWE-416: Use After Free •

CVSS: 6.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 33EXPL: 1

Integer overflows were discovered in the functions grub_cmd_initrd and grub_initrd_init in the efilinux component of GRUB2, as shipped in Debian, Red Hat, and Ubuntu (the functionality is not included in GRUB2 upstream), leading to a heap-based buffer overflow. These could be triggered by an extremely large number of arguments to the initrd command on 32-bit architectures, or a crafted filesystem with very large files on any architecture. An attacker could use this to execute arbitrary code and bypass UEFI Secure Boot restrictions. This issue affects GRUB2 version 2.04 and prior versions. Se detectaron desbordamientos de enteros en las funciones grub_cmd_initrd y grub_initrd_init en el componente efilinux de GRUB2, como se incluye en Debian, Red Hat y Ubuntu (la funcionalidad no está incluida aguas arriba de GRUB2), conllevando a un desbordamiento del búfer en la región heap de la memoria. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-08/msg00016.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-08/msg00017.html http://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-4432-1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/07/29/3 https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/grub2bootloader https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2020-07/msg00034.html https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/ADV200011 https://security.gentoo.org/ • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

The version of docker as released for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extras via RHBA-2020:0053 advisory included an incorrect version of runc missing the fix for CVE-2019-5736, which was previously fixed via RHSA-2019:0304. This issue could allow a malicious or compromised container to compromise the container host and other containers running on the same host. This issue only affects docker version 1.13.1-108.git4ef4b30.el7, shipped in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extras. Both earlier and later versions are not affected. La versión de Docker según lo publicado para Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extras por medio del aviso RHBA-2020:0053 incluía una versión incorrecta de runc que no tenía la corrección para CVE-2019-5736, que se corrigió previamente por medio de RHSA-2019:0304. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:0427 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-14298 https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/runcescape https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-5736 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848239 https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/runc-regression-docker-1.13.1-108 • CWE-271: Privilege Dropping / Lowering Errors CWE-273: Improper Check for Dropped Privileges •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

A flaw was found in the OpenShift API Server, where it failed to sufficiently protect OAuthTokens by leaking them into the logs when an API Server panic occurred. This flaw allows an attacker with the ability to cause an API Server error to read the logs, and use the leaked OAuthToken to log into the API Server with the leaked token. Se encontró un fallo en el OpenShift API Server, donde presento un fallo al proteger de manera suficiente a los OAuthTokens al filtrarlos en los registros cuando se produjo un pánico del API Server. Este fallo permite a un atacante con la capacidad de causar un error del API Server leer los registros y usar el OAuthToken filtrado para iniciar sesión en el API Server con el token filtrado • https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/323 https://github.com/openshift/origin/blob/master/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/staging/src/k8s.io/apiserver/pkg/server/filters/wrap.go#L39 • CWE-522: Insufficiently Protected Credentials CWE-532: Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File •

CVSS: 7.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0

Kibana versions before 6.8.9 and 7.7.0 contain a prototype pollution flaw in TSVB. An authenticated attacker with privileges to create TSVB visualizations could insert data that would cause Kibana to execute arbitrary code. This could possibly lead to an attacker executing code with the permissions of the Kibana process on the host system. Kibana versiones anteriores a 6.8.9 y 7.7.0, contienen un fallo de contaminación de prototipo en TSVB. Un atacante autenticado con privilegios para crear visualizaciones TSVB podría insertar datos que harían que Kibana ejecute código arbitrario. • https://www.elastic.co/community/security https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-7013 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849044 • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •