CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1067 – undertow: HTTP header injection using CRLF with UTF-8 Encoding (incomplete fix of CVE-2016-4993)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1067
In Undertow before versions 7.1.2.CR1, 7.1.2.GA it was found that the fix for CVE-2016-4993 was incomplete and Undertow web server is vulnerable to the injection of arbitrary HTTP headers, and also response splitting, due to insufficient sanitization and validation of user input before the input is used as part of an HTTP header value. En Undertow, en versiones anteriores a la 7.1.2.CR1, 7.1.2.GA, se descubrió que la solución para CVE-2016-4993 no estaba completa. Por lo tanto, el servidor web de Undertow es vulnerable a la inyección de cabeceras HTTP arbitrarias y también a la separación de respuestas, debido al saneamiento y validación insuficientes de entradas de usuario antes de que se empleen como parte de un valor de cabecera HTTP. It was found that the fix for CVE-2016-4993 was incomplete and Undertow web server is vulnerable to the injection of arbitrary HTTP headers, and also response splitting, due to insufficient sanitization and validation of user input before the input is used as part of an HTTP header value. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1247 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1248 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1249 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1251 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2643 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0877 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-1067 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-1067 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550671 • CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting') •
CVSS: 8.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1088 – glusterfs: Privilege escalation via gluster_shared_storage when snapshot scheduling is enabled
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1088
A privilege escalation flaw was found in gluster 3.x snapshot scheduler. Any gluster client allowed to mount gluster volumes could also mount shared gluster storage volume and escalate privileges by scheduling malicious cronjob via symlink. Se ha encontrado un error de escalado de privilegios en el programador de capturas en gluster, en versiones 3.x. Cualquier cliente gluster al que se le permita montar volúmenes de gluster también podría montar un volumen de almacenamiento compartido de gluster y escalar privilegios programando un cronjob malicioso mediante un enlace simbólico. A privilege escalation flaw was found in gluster snapshot scheduler. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00035.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1136 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1137 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1275 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1524 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558721 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/11/msg00000.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201904-06 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018- • CWE-266: Incorrect Privilege Assignment •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 39EXPL: 0CVE-2018-8088 – slf4j: Deserialisation vulnerability in EventData constructor can allow for arbitrary code execution
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-8088
org.slf4j.ext.EventData in the slf4j-ext module in QOS.CH SLF4J before 1.8.0-beta2 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via crafted data. EventData in the slf4j-ext module in QOS.CH SLF4J, has been fixed in SLF4J versions 1.7.26 later and in the 2.0.x series. org.slf4j.ext.EventData en el módulo slf4j-ext en QOS.CH SLF4J antes de la versión 1.8.0-beta2 permite a los atacantes remotos saltarse las restricciones de acceso previstas a través de datos manipulados. EventData en el módulo slf4j-ext en QOS.CH SLF4J, ha sido corregido en las versiones 1.7.26 posteriores de SLF4J y en la serie 2.0.x An XML deserialization vulnerability was discovered in slf4j's EventData, which accepts an XML serialized string and can lead to arbitrary code execution. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103737 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040627 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0582 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0592 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0627 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0628 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0629 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0630 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1247 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1248 https: • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 4%CPEs: 23EXPL: 2CVE-2018-7750 – Paramiko 2.4.1 - Authentication Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-7750
transport.py in the SSH server implementation of Paramiko before 1.17.6, 1.18.x before 1.18.5, 2.0.x before 2.0.8, 2.1.x before 2.1.5, 2.2.x before 2.2.3, 2.3.x before 2.3.2, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1 does not properly check whether authentication is completed before processing other requests, as demonstrated by channel-open. A customized SSH client can simply skip the authentication step. transport.py en la implementación del servidor SSH de Paramiko, en versiones anteriores a la 1.17.6; versiones 1.18.x anteriores a la 1.18.5; versiones 2.0.x anteriores a la 2.0.8; versiones 2.1.x anteriores a la 2.1.5; versiones 2.2.x anteriores a la 2.2.3; versiones 2.3.x anteriores a la 2.3.2 y versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.1, no comprueba adecuadamente si la autenticación se ha completado antes de procesar otras peticiones, tal y como demuestra channel-open. Un cliente SSH personalizado puede simplemente omitir el paso de autenticación. It was found that when acting as an SSH server, paramiko did not properly check whether authentication is completed before processing other requests. A customized SSH client could use this to bypass authentication when accessing any resources controlled by paramiko. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45712 https://github.com/jm33-m0/CVE-2018-7750 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103713 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0591 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0646 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1124 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1125 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1213 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1274 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1328 https:&#x • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 9%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5968 – jackson-databind: unsafe deserialization due to incomplete blacklist (incomplete fix for CVE-2017-7525 and CVE-2017-17485)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5968
FasterXML jackson-databind through 2.8.11 and 2.9.x through 2.9.3 allows unauthenticated remote code execution because of an incomplete fix for the CVE-2017-7525 and CVE-2017-17485 deserialization flaws. This is exploitable via two different gadgets that bypass a blacklist. FasterXML jackson-databind, hasta la versión 2.8.11 y las versiones 2.9.x hasta la 2.9.3, permite la ejecución remota de código sin autenticar debido a una solución incompleta para los errores de deserialización CVE-2017-7525 y CVE-2017-17485. Esto es explotable mediante dos gadgets diferentes que omiten una lista negra. A deserialization flaw was discovered in the jackson-databind that could allow an unauthenticated user to perform code execution by sending the maliciously crafted input to the readValue method of the ObjectMapper. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0478 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0479 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0480 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0481 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1525 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2858 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3149 https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/1899 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180423-0002 https://support.hpe.com/h • CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •