CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 3%CPEs: 148EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4556 – squid: SIGSEGV in ESIContext response handling
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4556
Double free vulnerability in Esi.cc in Squid 3.x before 3.5.18 and 4.x before 4.0.10 allows remote servers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted Edge Side Includes (ESI) response. Vulnerabilidad de liberación doble de memoria en Esi.cc en Squid 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.18 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.10 permite a servidores remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída) a través de una respuesta Edge Side Includes (ESI) manipulada. An incorrect reference counting flaw was found in the way Squid processes ESI responses. If Squid is configured as reverse-proxy, for TLS/HTTPS interception, an attacker controlling a server accessed by Squid, could crash the squid worker, causing a Denial of Service attack. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/06/5 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinapr2016-2952096.html http://www.securitytracker.com/ • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 5.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 146EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4053 – squid: multiple issues in ESI processing
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4053
Squid 3.x before 3.5.17 and 4.x before 4.0.9 allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive stack layout information via crafted Edge Side Includes (ESI) responses, related to incorrect use of assert and compiler optimization. Squid 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.17 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.9 permite a atacantes remotos obtener información sensible sobre la estructura de pila a través de respuestas Edge Side Includes (ESI) manipuladas, relacionado con el uso incorrecto de assert y optimización del compilador. Buffer overflow and input validation flaws were found in the way Squid processed ESI responses. If Squid was used as a reverse proxy, or for TLS/HTTPS interception, a remote attacker able to control ESI components on an HTTP server could use these flaws to crash Squid, disclose parts of the stack memory, or possibly execute arbitrary code as the user running Squid. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/6 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/9 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2016-2881720.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/t • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 4%CPEs: 144EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4052 – squid: multiple issues in ESI processing
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4052
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Squid 3.x before 3.5.17 and 4.x before 4.0.9 allow remote HTTP servers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via crafted Edge Side Includes (ESI) responses. Múltiples desbordamientos de buffer basado en pila en Squid 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.17 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.9 permiten a servidores HTTP remotos provocar una denegación de servicio o ejecutar código arbitrario a través de respuestas Edge Side Includes (ESI) manipuladas. Buffer overflow and input validation flaws were found in the way Squid processed ESI responses. If Squid was used as a reverse proxy, or for TLS/HTTPS interception, a remote attacker able to control ESI components on an HTTP server could use these flaws to crash Squid, disclose parts of the stack memory, or possibly execute arbitrary code as the user running Squid. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/6 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/9 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2016-2881720.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/t • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 21%CPEs: 146EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4054 – squid: multiple issues in ESI processing
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4054
Buffer overflow in Squid 3.x before 3.5.17 and 4.x before 4.0.9 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted Edge Side Includes (ESI) responses. Desbordamiento de buffer en Squid 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.17 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.9 permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de respuestas Edge Side Includes (ESI) manipuladas. Buffer overflow and input validation flaws were found in the way Squid processed ESI responses. If Squid was used as a reverse proxy, or for TLS/HTTPS interception, a remote attacker able to control ESI components on an HTTP server could use these flaws to crash Squid, disclose parts of the stack memory, or possibly execute arbitrary code as the user running Squid. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/6 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/9 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinapr2016-2952096.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bi • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 154EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4051 – squid: buffer overflow in cachemgr.cgi
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4051
Buffer overflow in cachemgr.cgi in Squid 2.x, 3.x before 3.5.17, and 4.x before 4.0.9 might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code by seeding manager reports with crafted data. Desbordamiento de buffer en cachemgr.cgi en Squid 2.x, 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.17 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.9 podría permitir a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio o ejecutar código arbitrario sembrando informes manager con datos manipulados. A buffer overflow flaw was found in the way the Squid cachemgr.cgi utility processed remotely relayed Squid input. When the CGI interface utility is used, a remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to execute arbitrary code. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/6 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/9 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2016-2881720.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/t • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow •