CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2024-47681 – wifi: mt76: mt7996: fix NULL pointer dereference in mt7996_mcu_sta_bfer_he
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-47681
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: mt76: mt7996: fix NULL pointer dereference in mt7996_mcu_sta_bfer_he Fix the NULL pointer dereference in mt7996_mcu_sta_bfer_he routine adding an sta interface to the mt7996 driver. Found by code review. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/98686cd21624c75a043e96812beadddf4f6f48e5 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8e4b60ae8a047ad2fb175fcfdd54feee80983a45 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/174c803b432596cdd7dd3ec5e0ec52b561969ee2 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1afdde3b5f56217d875a543cf565075c11bbddad https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f503ae90c7355e8506e68498fe84c1357894cd5b •
CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0CVE-2024-47679 – vfs: fix race between evice_inodes() and find_inode()&iput()
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-47679
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vfs: fix race between evice_inodes() and find_inode()&iput() Hi, all Recently I noticed a bug[1] in btrfs, after digged it into and I believe it'a race in vfs. Let's assume there's a inode (ie ino 261) with i_count 1 is called by iput(), and there's a concurrent thread calling generic_shutdown_super(). cpu0: cpu1: iput() // i_count is 1 ->spin_lock(inode) ->dec i_count to 0 ->iput_final() generic_shutdown_super() ->__inode_add_lru() ->evict_inodes() // cause some reason[2] ->if (atomic_read(inode->i_count)) continue; // return before // inode 261 passed the above check // list_lru_add_obj() // and then schedule out ->spin_unlock() // note here: the inode 261 // was still at sb list and hash list, // and I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE was not been set btrfs_iget() // after some function calls ->find_inode() // found the above inode 261 ->spin_lock(inode) // check I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE // and passed ->__iget() ->spin_unlock(inode) // schedule back ->spin_lock(inode) // check (I_NEW|I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE) flags, // passed and set I_FREEING iput() ->spin_unlock(inode) ->spin_lock(inode) ->evict() // dec i_count to 0 ->iput_final() ->spin_unlock() ->evict() Now, we have two threads simultaneously evicting the same inode, which may trigger the BUG(inode->i_state & I_CLEAR) statement both within clear_inode() and iput(). To fix the bug, recheck the inode->i_count after holding i_lock. Because in the most scenarios, the first check is valid, and the overhead of spin_lock() can be reduced. If there is any misunderstanding, please let me know, thanks. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000eabe1d0619c48986@google.com/ [2]: The reason might be 1. SB_ACTIVE was removed or 2. mapping_shrinkable() return false when I reproduced the bug. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/63997e98a3be68d7cec806d22bf9b02b2e1daabb https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6cc13a80a26e6b48f78c725c01b91987d61563ef https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/489faddb1ae75b0e1a741fe5ca2542a2b5e794a5 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/47a68c75052a660e4c37de41e321582ec9496195 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3721a69403291e2514d13a7c3af50a006ea1153b https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/540fb13120c9eab3ef203f90c00c8e69f37449d1 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0eed942bc65de1f93eca7bda51344290f9c573bb https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0f8a5b6d0dafa4f533ac82e98f8b81207 •
CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2024-47678 – icmp: change the order of rate limits
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-47678
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: icmp: change the order of rate limits ICMP messages are ratelimited : After the blamed commits, the two rate limiters are applied in this order: 1) host wide ratelimit (icmp_global_allow()) 2) Per destination ratelimit (inetpeer based) In order to avoid side-channels attacks, we need to apply the per destination check first. This patch makes the following change : 1) icmp_global_allow() checks if the host wide limit is reached. But credits are not yet consumed. This is deferred to 3) 2) The per destination limit is checked/updated. This might add a new node in inetpeer tree. 3) icmp_global_consume() consumes tokens if prior operations succeeded. This means that host wide ratelimit is still effective in keeping inetpeer tree small even under DDOS. As a bonus, I removed icmp_global.lock as the fast path can use a lock-free operation. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4cdf507d54525842dfd9f6313fdafba039084046 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/997ba8889611891f91e8ad83583466aeab6239a3 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/662ec52260cc07b9ae53ecd3925183c29d34288b https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a7722921adb046e3836eb84372241f32584bdb07 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/483397b4ba280813e4a9c161a0a85172ddb43d19 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8c2bd38b95f75f3d2a08c93e35303e26d480d24e •
CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2024-47675 – bpf: Fix use-after-free in bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach()
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-47675
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix use-after-free in bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach() If bpf_link_prime() fails, bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach() goes to the error_free label and frees the array of bpf_uprobe's without calling bpf_uprobe_unregister(). This leaks bpf_uprobe->uprobe and worse, this frees bpf_uprobe->consumer without removing it from the uprobe->consumers list. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/89ae89f53d201143560f1e9ed4bfa62eee34f88e https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/790c630ab0e7d7aba6d186581d4627c09fce60f3 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7c1d782e5afbf7c50ba74ecc4ddc18a05d63e5ee https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cdf27834c3dd5d9abf7eb8e4ee87ee9e307eb25c https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5fe6e308abaea082c20fbf2aa5df8e14495622cf •
CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2024-47674 – mm: avoid leaving partial pfn mappings around in error case
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-47674
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: avoid leaving partial pfn mappings around in error case As Jann points out, PFN mappings are special, because unlike normal memory mappings, there is no lifetime information associated with the mapping - it is just a raw mapping of PFNs with no reference counting of a 'struct page'. That's all very much intentional, but it does mean that it's easy to mess up the cleanup in case of errors. Yes, a failed mmap() will always eventually clean up any partial mappings, but without any explicit lifetime in the page table mapping itself, it's very easy to do the error handling in the wrong order. In particular, it's easy to mistakenly free the physical backing store before the page tables are actually cleaned up and (temporarily) have stale dangling PTE entries. To make this situation less error-prone, just make sure that any partial pfn mapping is torn down early, before any other error handling. En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: mm: evitar dejar asignaciones pfn parciales en caso de error Como señala Jann, las asignaciones PFN son especiales, porque a diferencia de las asignaciones de memoria normales, no hay información de duración asociada con la asignación: es solo una asignación sin procesar de PFN sin recuento de referencias de una 'página de estructura'. Todo eso es muy intencional, pero significa que es fácil arruinar la limpieza en caso de errores. Sí, un mmap() fallido siempre limpiará eventualmente cualquier asignación parcial, pero sin ninguna duración explícita en la asignación de la tabla de páginas en sí, es muy fácil hacer el manejo de errores en el orden incorrecto. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3213fdcab961026203dd587a4533600c70b3336b https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/35770ca6180caa24a2b258c99a87bd437a1ee10f https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5b2c8b34f6d76bfbd1dd4936eb8a0fbfb9af3959 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/65d0db500d7c07f0f76fc24a4d837791c4862cd2 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a95a24fcaee1b892e47d5e6dcc403f713874ee80 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/954fd4c81f22c4b6ba65379a81fd252971bf4ef3 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/79a61cc3fc0466ad2b7b89618a6157785f0293b3 https://project-zero.issues.chromium.org/issues/366053091 •