Page 116 of 673 results (0.014 seconds)

CVSS: 7.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

CVE-2017-0301

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-0301

In F5 BIG-IP APM software versions 11.5.0, 11.5.1, 11.5.2, 11.5.3, 11.5.4, 11.6.0, 11.6.1, 12.0.0, 12.1.0, 12.1.1 and 12.1.2 BIG-IP APM portal access requests do not return the intended resources in some cases. This may allow access to internal BIG-IP APM resources, however the application resources and backend servers are unaffected. En F5 BIG-IP APM, en sus versiones 1.5.0, 11.5.1, 11.5.2, 11.5.3, 11.5.4, 11.6.0, 11.6.1, 12.0.0, 12.1.0, 12.1.1 y 12.1.2, las peticiones de acceso al portal BIG-IP APM no devuelven los recursos esperados en algunos casos. Esto puede permitir el acceso a recursos internos de BIG-IP APM. Sin embargo, los recursos de aplicación y los servidores backend no se ven afectados. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040040 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K54358225 •

CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 104EXPL: 0

CVE-2017-6164

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-6164

In F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, Edge Gateway, GTM, Link Controller, PEM, WebAccelerator and WebSafe software version 13.0.0, 12.0.0 - 12.1.2, 11.6.0 - 11.6.1 and 11.5.0 - 11.5.4, in some circumstances, Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) does not properly handle certain malformed TLS1.2 records, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) or possible remote command execution on the BIG-IP system. En F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, Edge Gateway, GTM, Link Controller, PEM, WebAccelerator y WebSafe en las versiones de software 13.0.0, de la 12.0.0 a la 12.1.2, de la 11.6.0 a la 11.6.1 y de la 11.5.0 a la 11.5.5.4, en algunas circunstancias, Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) no maneja correctamente determinados registros TLS1.2 mal formados, lo que permite a los atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (DoS) o, posiblemente, ejecutar comandos remotos en el sistema BIG-IP. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040054 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K02714910 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

CVE-2017-6166

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-6166

In BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, Link Controller, PEM, and WebSafe software 12.0.0 to 12.1.1, in some cases the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) may crash when processing fragmented packets. This vulnerability affects TMM through a virtual server configured with a FastL4 profile. Traffic processing is disrupted while TMM restarts. If the affected BIG-IP system is configured as part of a device group, it will trigger a failover to the peer device. En el software BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, Link Controller, PEM y WebSafe desde la versión 12.0.0 a la 12.1.1, en algunos casos, el componente Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) podría cerrarse inesperadamente al procesar paquetes fragmentados. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102264 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039949 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K65615624 • CWE-415: Double Free •

CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0

CVE-2017-6168

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-6168

On BIG-IP versions 11.6.0-11.6.2 (fixed in 11.6.2 HF1), 12.0.0-12.1.2 HF1 (fixed in 12.1.2 HF2), or 13.0.0-13.0.0 HF2 (fixed in 13.0.0 HF3) a virtual server configured with a Client SSL profile may be vulnerable to an Adaptive Chosen Ciphertext attack (AKA Bleichenbacher attack) against RSA, which when exploited, may result in plaintext recovery of encrypted messages and/or a Man-in-the-middle (MiTM) attack, despite the attacker not having gained access to the server's private key itself, aka a ROBOT attack. En BIG-IP en las versiones desde la 11.6.0 hasta la 11.6.2 (solucionado en la versión 11.6.2 HF1), desde la 12.0.0 hasta la 12.1.2 HF1 (solucionado en la versión 12.1.2 HF2) o desde la 13.0.0 hasta la 13.0.0 HF2 (solucionado en la versión 13.0.0 HF3) un servidor virtual configurado con un perfil SSL de cliente puede ser vulnerable a un ataque adaptativo de texto cifrado escogido (también conocido como ataque Bleichenbacher) contra RSA. Cuando se explota este ataque, puede dar lugar a la recuperación de texto plano de mensajes cifrados y/o a un ataque Man-in-the-middle (MiTM), a pesar de que el atacante no haya obtenido acceso a la propia clave privada del servidor. Esto también se conoce como ataque ROBOT. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101901 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039839 https://robotattack.org https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K21905460 https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/144389 • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 1%CPEs: 26EXPL: 0

CVE-2017-6160

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-6160

In F5 BIG-IP AAM and PEM software version 12.0.0 to 12.1.1, 11.6.0 to 11.6.1, 11.4.1 to 11.5.4, a remote attacker may create maliciously crafted HTTP request to cause Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to restart and temporarily fail to process traffic. This issue is exposed on virtual servers using a Policy Enforcement profile or a Web Acceleration profile. Systems that do not have BIG-IP AAM module provisioned are not vulnerable. The Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) may restart and temporarily fail to process traffic. Systems that do not have BIG-IP AAM or PEM module provisioned are not vulnerable. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101632 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039670 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K19430431 •