CVSS: 4.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2021-24119
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-24119
In Trusted Firmware Mbed TLS 2.24.0, a side-channel vulnerability in base64 PEM file decoding allows system-level (administrator) attackers to obtain information about secret RSA keys via a controlled-channel and side-channel attack on software running in isolated environments that can be single stepped, especially Intel SGX. En Trusted Firmware Mbed versión TLS versión 2.24.0, una vulnerabilidad de canal lateral en la decodificación de archivos PEM base64, permite a atacantes a nivel de sistema (administrador) obtener información sobre claves RSA secretas por medio de un ataque de canal controlado y de canal lateral en el software ejecutándose entornos aislados que pueden ser de un solo paso, especialmente Intel SGX • https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/releases https://github.com/UzL-ITS/util-lookup/blob/main/cve-vulnerability-publication.md https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/11/msg00021.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/12/msg00036.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DRRVY7DMTX3ECFNZKDYTSFEG5AI2HBC6 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EYJW7HAW3TDV2YMDFYXP3HD6WRQRTLJW • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2021-34552 – python-pillow: Buffer overflow in image convert function
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-34552
Pillow through 8.2.0 and PIL (aka Python Imaging Library) through 1.1.7 allow an attacker to pass controlled parameters directly into a convert function to trigger a buffer overflow in Convert.c. Pillow versiones hasta 8.2.0 y PIL (también se conoce como Python Imaging Library) versiones hasta 1.1.7, permiten a un atacante pasar parámetros controlados directamente a una función de conversión para desencadenar un desbordamiento de búfer en el archivo Convert.c A flaw was found in python-pillow. This flaw allows an attacker to pass controlled parameters directly into a convert function, triggering a buffer overflow in the "convert()" or "ImagingConvertTransparent()" functions in Convert.c. The highest threat to this vulnerability is to system availability. In Red Hat Quay, a vulnerable version of python-pillow is shipped with quay-registry-container, however the invoice generation feature which uses python-pillow is disabled by default. Therefore impact has been rated Moderate. • https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/07/msg00018.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7V6LCG525ARIX6LX5QRYNAWVDD2MD2SV https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VUGBBT63VL7G4JNOEIPDJIOC34ZFBKNJ https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/8.3.0.html#buffer-overflow https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/index.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202211-10 https://access.redha • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 6EXPL: 1CVE-2021-31810 – ruby: FTP PASV command response can cause Net::FTP to connect to arbitrary host
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-31810
An issue was discovered in Ruby through 2.6.7, 2.7.x through 2.7.3, and 3.x through 3.0.1. A malicious FTP server can use the PASV response to trick Net::FTP into connecting back to a given IP address and port. This potentially makes curl extract information about services that are otherwise private and not disclosed (e.g., the attacker can conduct port scans and service banner extractions). Se ha detectado un problema en Ruby versiones hasta 2.6.7, versiones 2.7.x hasta 2.7.3, y versiones 3.x hasta 3.0.1. Un servidor FTP malicioso puede usar la respuesta PASV para engañar a la función Net::FTP para que se conecte de nuevo a una dirección IP y un puerto determinados. • https://hackerone.com/reports/1145454 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/10/msg00009.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/04/msg00033.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MWXHK5UUHVSHF7HTHMX6JY3WXDVNIHSL https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202401-27 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210917-0001 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2021/07/07/ • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 10%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2021-33037 – Incorrect Transfer-Encoding handling with HTTP/1.0
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-33037
Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.46 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.66 did not correctly parse the HTTP transfer-encoding request header in some circumstances leading to the possibility to request smuggling when used with a reverse proxy. Specifically: - Tomcat incorrectly ignored the transfer encoding header if the client declared it would only accept an HTTP/1.0 response; - Tomcat honoured the identify encoding; and - Tomcat did not ensure that, if present, the chunked encoding was the final encoding. Apache Tomcat versiones 10.0.0-M1 hasta 10.0.6, versiones 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.46 y versiones 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.66, no analizaban correctamente el encabezado de petición HTTP transfer-encoding en algunas circunstancias, conllevando a la posibilidad de contrabando de peticiones cuando se usaba con un proxy inverso. Específicamente: - Tomcat ignoraba incorrectamente el encabezado de codificación de transferencia si el cliente declaraba que sólo aceptaría una respuesta HTTP/1.0; - Tomcat honraba la codificación de identificación; y - Tomcat no se aseguraba de que, si estaba presente, la codificación en trozos fuera la codificación final • https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10366 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r290aee55b72811fd19e75ac80f6143716c079170c5671b96932ed44b%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r40f921575aee8d7d34e53182f862c45cbb8f3d898c9d4e865c2ec262%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r612a79269b0d5e5780c62dfd34286a8037232fec0bc6f1a7e60c9381%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc6ef52453bb996a98cb45442871a1db56b7c349939e45d829bf9ae37%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https:/ • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0CVE-2021-30640 – Auth weakness in JNDIRealm
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-30640
A vulnerability in the JNDI Realm of Apache Tomcat allows an attacker to authenticate using variations of a valid user name and/or to bypass some of the protection provided by the LockOut Realm. This issue affects Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.5; 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.45; 8.5.0 to 8.5.65. Una vulnerabilidad en el ámbito JNDI de Apache Tomcat permite a un atacante autenticarse usando variaciones de un nombre de usuario válido y/o omitir parte de la protección proporcionada por el ámbito LockOut. Este problema afecta a Apache Tomcat versiones 10.0.0-M1 hasta 10.0.5; versiones 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.45; versiones 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.65 • https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r59f9ef03929d32120f91f4ea7e6e79edd5688d75d0a9b65fd26d1fe8%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/08/msg00009.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-34 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210827-0007 https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4952 https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4986 https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html https:&# • CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output CWE-287: Improper Authentication •