Page 119 of 1833 results (0.013 seconds)

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0

An issue was discovered in Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24. The .setdistillerkeys PostScript command is accepted even though it is not intended for use during document processing (e.g., after the startup phase). This leads to memory corruption, allowing remote attackers able to supply crafted PostScript to crash the interpreter or possibly have unspecified other impact. Note: A reputable source believes that the CVE is potentially a duplicate of CVE-2018-15910 as explained in Red Hat bugzilla (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626193) ** EN DISPUTA ** Se ha descubierto un problema en versiones anteriores a la 9.24 de Artifex Ghostscript. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=1497d65039885a52b598b137dd8622bd4672f9be http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=971472c83a345a16dac9f90f91258bb22dd77f22 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626193 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00015.html https://seclists.org/oss-sec/2018/q3/182 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-12 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3768-1 https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4288 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

curl before version 7.61.1 is vulnerable to a buffer overrun in the NTLM authentication code. The internal function Curl_ntlm_core_mk_nt_hash multiplies the length of the password by two (SUM) to figure out how large temporary storage area to allocate from the heap. The length value is then subsequently used to iterate over the password and generate output into the allocated storage buffer. On systems with a 32 bit size_t, the math to calculate SUM triggers an integer overflow when the password length exceeds 2GB (2^31 bytes). This integer overflow usually causes a very small buffer to actually get allocated instead of the intended very huge one, making the use of that buffer end up in a heap buffer overflow. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041605 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3558 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1880 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-14618 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-436177.pdf https://curl.haxx.se/docs/CVE-2018-14618.html https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2018-0014 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201903-03 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3765-1 https://usn.ubuntu.com/ • CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow CWE-131: Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0

In Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24, gssetresolution and gsgetresolution allow attackers to have an unspecified impact. En Artifex Ghostscript en versiones anteriores a la 9.24, gssetresolution y gsgetresolution permiten que los atacantes provoquen un impacto sin especificar. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=5b5536fa88a9e885032bc0df3852c3439399a5c0 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699670 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00038.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-12 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3768-1 https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4288 •

CVSS: 7.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

In Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files could use insufficient interpreter stack-size checking during error handling to crash the interpreter. En Artifex Ghostscript en versiones anteriores a la 9.24, los atacantes que puedan proporcionar archivos PostScript manipulados podrían emplear una comprobación insuficiente del tamaño de la pila del intérprete durante el manejo de errores para provocar el cierre inesperado del intérprete. It was discovered that ghostscript did not properly handle certain stack overflow error conditions. An attacker could possibly exploit this to bypass the -dSAFER protection and crash ghostscript or, possibly, execute arbitrary code in the ghostscript context via a specially crafted PostScript document. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=b575e1ec42cc86f6a58c603f2a88fcc2af699cc8 http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2018/q3/182 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105337 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2918 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699668 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00015.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-12 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3768-1 https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4288 https://acc • CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 7.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0

In Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files could use incorrect free logic in pagedevice replacement to crash the interpreter. En Artifex Ghostscript en versiones anteriores a la 9.24, los atacantes que puedan proporcionar archivos PostScript manipulados podrían emplear una lógica libre incorrecta en el reemplazo pagedevice para provocar el cierre inesperado del intérprete. It was discovered that the ghostscript device cleanup did not properly handle devices replaced with a null device. An attacker could possibly exploit this to bypass the -dSAFER protection and crash ghostscript or, possibly, execute arbitrary code in the ghostscript context via a specially crafted PostScript document. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=241d91112771a6104de10b3948c3f350d6690c1d https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3834 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699664 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00015.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-12 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3768-1 https://www.artifex.com/news/ghostscript-security-resolved https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4288 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE- • CWE-416: Use After Free •