Page 12 of 66 results (0.017 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 7EXPL: 2

lib/gnutls_pk.c in libgnutls in GnuTLS 2.5.0 through 2.6.5 generates RSA keys stored in DSA structures, instead of the intended DSA keys, which might allow remote attackers to spoof signatures on certificates or have unspecified other impact by leveraging an invalid DSA key. lib/gnutls_pk.c en libgnutls en GnuTLS v2.5.0 hasta v2.6.5 genera claves RSA almacenados en estructuras DSA, en lugar de las claves DSA previstas, lo cual podría permitir a atacantes remotos suplantar firmas en los certificados o tener otro impacto no especificado por el utilizamiento de una clave DSA no es válida. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32965 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/3516 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnutls/2009-04/msg00018.html http://secunia.com/advisories/34842 http://secunia.com/advisories/35211 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200905-04.xml http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:116 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34783 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022158 http://www.vupen.com/english • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •

CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 12%CPEs: 1EXPL: 2

lib/pk-libgcrypt.c in libgnutls in GnuTLS before 2.6.6 does not properly handle invalid DSA signatures, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly have unspecified other impact via a malformed DSA key that triggers a (1) free of an uninitialized pointer or (2) double free. lib/pk-libgcrypt.c en libgnutls en GnuTLS anterior a v2.6.6 no maneja correctamente las firmas DSA, lo cual permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (cuelgue de aplicación) y posiblemente tiene otro impacto no especificado a través de una clave DSA malformada que desencadena (1) una liberación del puntero no inicializado. (2) una doble liberación. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32964 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/3515 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/3502 http://secunia.com/advisories/34842 http://secunia.com/advisories/35211 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200905-04.xml http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/3488 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:116 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34783 http:/& • CWE-824: Access of Uninitialized Pointer •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 117EXPL: 0

gnutls-cli in GnuTLS before 2.6.6 does not verify the activation and expiration times of X.509 certificates, which allows remote attackers to successfully present a certificate that is (1) not yet valid or (2) no longer valid, related to lack of time checks in the _gnutls_x509_verify_certificate function in lib/x509/verify.c in libgnutls_x509, as used by (a) Exim, (b) OpenLDAP, and (c) libsoup. gnutls-cli en GnuTLS anteriores a v2.6.6 no verifica la activación y tiempos de caducidad de los certificados X.509, lo cual permite a atacantes remotos presentar con éxito un certificado que (1) aún es válido o (2) ya no es válido, en relación con la falta de controles en el tiempo la función _gnutls_x509_verify_certificate en lib/x509/verify.c en libgnutls_x509, utilizado por (a) Exim, (b) OpenLDAP y (c) libsoup. • http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/3517 http://secunia.com/advisories/34842 http://secunia.com/advisories/35211 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200905-04.xml http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:116 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34783 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022159 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1218 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/50261 • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 13EXPL: 0

The _gnutls_x509_verify_certificate function in lib/x509/verify.c in libgnutls in GnuTLS before 2.6.1 trusts certificate chains in which the last certificate is an arbitrary trusted, self-signed certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to insert a spoofed certificate for any Distinguished Name (DN). La función _gnutls_x509_verify_certificate en lib/x509/verify.c en libgnutls en GnuTLS antes de v2.6.1 confía en las cadenas de certificado en las que el último certificado es un certificado de confianza arbitraria, auto-firmado, lo que permite a atacantes de tipo "hombre en el medio" (man-in-the-middle) insertar un certificado falso para cualquier Distinguished Name(DN). • http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/3215 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/3217 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2008-12/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-04/msg00010.html http://secunia.com/advisories/32619 http://secunia.com/advisories/32681 http://secunia.com/advisories/32687 http://secunia.com/advisories/32879 http://secunia.com/advisories/33501 http://secunia.com/advi • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •

CVSS: 7.6EPSS: 2%CPEs: 6EXPL: 1

Use-after-free vulnerability in the _gnutls_handshake_hash_buffers_clear function in lib/gnutls_handshake.c in libgnutls in GnuTLS 2.3.5 through 2.4.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via TLS transmission of data that is improperly used when the peer calls gnutls_handshake within a normal session, leading to attempted access to a deallocated libgcrypt handle. Vulnerabilidad de uso después de liberación en la función _gnutls_handshake_hash_buffers_clear de lib/gnutls_handshake.c en libgnutls de GnuTLS 2.3.5 hasta 2.4.0 permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caida) o posiblemente ejecutar código de su elección a través de transmisiones TLS de datos que no son usadas apropiadamente cuando las llamadas pares gnutls_handshake dentro de una sesión normal, conducen a intentos de acceso a manejadores libgcrypt no asignados. • http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/2947 http://secunia.com/advisories/31505 http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/security.html http://www.nabble.com/Details-on-the-gnutls_handshake-local-crash-problem--GNUTLS-SA-2008-2--td18205022.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30713 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2398 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/44486 https://issues.rpath.com/browse/RPL-2650 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •