Page 12 of 336 results (0.015 seconds)

CVSS: 8.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 17EXPL: 3

In logback version 1.2.7 and prior versions, an attacker with the required privileges to edit configurations files could craft a malicious configuration allowing to execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers. En logback versiones 1.2.7 y anteriores, un atacante con los privilegios necesarios para editar archivos de configuración podría diseñar una configuración maliciosa que permitiera ejecutar código arbitrario cargado desde servidores LDAP A flaw was found in the logback package. When using a specially-crafted configuration, this issue could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers. • http://logback.qos.ch/news.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/167794/Open-Xchange-App-Suite-7.10.x-Cross-Site-Scripting-Command-Injection.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Jul/11 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-371761.pdf https://github.com/cn-panda/logbackRceDemo https://jira.qos.ch/browse/LOGBACK-1591 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20211229-0001 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-42550 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_ • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 96%CPEs: 398EXPL: 30

Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects. • https://github.com/fullhunt/log4j-scan https://github.com/Puliczek/CVE-2021-44228-PoC-log4j-bypass-words https://github.com/cyberstruggle/L4sh https://github.com/woodpecker-appstore/log4j-payload-generator https://github.com/tangxiaofeng7/apache-log4j-poc https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51183 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50592 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50590 https://github.com/logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner https://github.com/jas502n/Log4j2-CVE-2021-44228 h • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data CWE-917: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection') •

CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

In Spring Framework versions 5.3.0 - 5.3.10, 5.2.0 - 5.2.17, and older unsupported versions, it is possible for a user to provide malicious input to cause the insertion of additional log entries. En Spring Framework versiones 5.3.0 - 5.3.10, 5.2.0 - 5.2.17, y en versiones anteriores no soportadas, es posible para un usuario proporcionar una entrada maliciosa para causar una inserción de entradas de registro adicionales • https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20211125-0005 https://tanzu.vmware.com/security/cve-2021-22096 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-22096 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034584 • CWE-117: Improper Output Neutralization for Logs •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

NetApp Cloud Manager versions prior to 3.9.10 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to retrieve sensitive data via the web proxy. NetApp Cloud Manager versiones anteriores a 3.9.10, son susceptibles de sufrir una vulnerabilidad que podría permitir a un atacante remoto no autenticado recuperar datos confidenciales por medio del proxy web • https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20211011-0001 •

CVSS: 9.0EPSS: 96%CPEs: 26EXPL: 8

A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier. Un uri-path diseñado puede causar que mod_proxy reenvíe la petición a un servidor de origen elegido por el usuario remoto. Este problema afecta a Apache HTTP Server versiones 2.4.48 y anteriores A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) flaw was found in mod_proxy of httpd. This flaw allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to make the httpd server forward requests to an arbitrary server. • https://github.com/sixpacksecurity/CVE-2021-40438 https://github.com/xiaojiangxl/CVE-2021-40438 https://github.com/Kashkovsky/CVE-2021-40438 https://github.com/sergiovks/CVE-2021-40438-Apache-2.4.48-SSRF-exploit https://github.com/BabyTeam1024/CVE-2021-40438 https://github.com/gassara-kys/CVE-2021-40438 https://github.com/Cappricio-Securities/CVE-2021-40438 https://github.com/pisut4152/Sigma-Rule-for-CVE-2021-40438-exploitation-attempt https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ • CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) •