CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 86%CPEs: 77EXPL: 2CVE-2019-0227 – Apache Axis 1.4 - Remote Code Execution
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-0227
A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability affected the Apache Axis 1.4 distribution that was last released in 2006. Security and bug commits commits continue in the projects Axis 1.x Subversion repository, legacy users are encouraged to build from source. The successor to Axis 1.x is Axis2, the latest version is 1.7.9 and is not vulnerable to this issue. Una vulnerabilidad de tipo SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) afectó a la distribución de Apache Axis 1.4 que fue lanzada por última vez en 2006. La seguridad y las confirmaciones de errores continúan en el repositorio de Subversion de Axis 1.x, se anima a los usuarios a construir desde el código fuente. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46682 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3a5baf5d76f1f2181be7f54da3deab70d7a38b5660b387583d05a8cd%40%3Cjava-user.axis.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r6d03e45b81eab03580cf7f8bb51cb3e9a1b10a2cc0c6a2d3cc92ed0c%40%3Cannounce.apache.org%3E https://rhinosecuritylabs.com/application-security/cve-2019-0227-expired-domain-rce-apache-axis https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpua • CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 13EXPL: 0CVE-2019-0222 – activemq: Corrupt MQTT frame can cause broker shutdown
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-0222
In Apache ActiveMQ 5.0.0 - 5.15.8, unmarshalling corrupt MQTT frame can lead to broker Out of Memory exception making it unresponsive. En Apache ActiveMQ, desde la versión 5.0.0 hasta la 5.15.8, la deserialización de una trama MQTT corrupta puede conducir a una excepción de bróker fuera de memoria, haciendo que no responda. • http://activemq.apache.org/security-advisories.data/CVE-2019-0222-announcement.txt http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/03/27/2 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107622 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/03f91b1fb85686a848cee6b90112cf6059bd1b21b23bacaa11a962e1%40%3Cdev.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2b5c0039197a4949f29e1e2c9441ab38d242946b966f61c110808bcc%40%3Ccommits.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/71640324661c1b6d0b6708bd4fb20170e1b979370a4b8cddc4f8d485%40%3Cdev.activemq.apache.org •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 1%CPEs: 180EXPL: 0CVE-2019-1559 – 0-byte record padding oracle
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-1559
If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00049.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00080.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107174 https://access. • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •
CVSS: 4.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 41EXPL: 2CVE-2018-5407 – Intel (Skylake / Kaby Lake) - 'PortSmash' CPU SMT Side-Channel
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5407
Simultaneous Multi-threading (SMT) in processors can enable local users to exploit software vulnerable to timing attacks via a side-channel timing attack on 'port contention'. SMT (Simultaneous Multi-threading) en los procesadores puede habilitar que usuarios locales exploten software vulnerable a ataques de sincronización mediante un ataques de sincronización de canal lateral en la "contención de puertos". A microprocessor side-channel vulnerability was found on SMT (e.g, Hyper-Threading) architectures. An attacker running a malicious process on the same core of the processor as the victim process can extract certain secret information. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45785 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105897 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0483 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0651 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0652 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2125 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3929 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3931 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3932 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3933 https& • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 44EXPL: 0CVE-2018-0734 – Timing attack against DSA
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-0734
The OpenSSL DSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2q (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2p). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00030.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00056.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105758 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2304 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3700 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3932 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3933 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3935 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm CWE-385: Covert Timing Channel •