CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 1%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2018-10237 – guava: Unbounded memory allocation in AtomicDoubleArray and CompoundOrdering classes allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-10237
Unbounded memory allocation in Google Guava 11.0 through 24.x before 24.1.1 allows remote attackers to conduct denial of service attacks against servers that depend on this library and deserialize attacker-provided data, because the AtomicDoubleArray class (when serialized with Java serialization) and the CompoundOrdering class (when serialized with GWT serialization) perform eager allocation without appropriate checks on what a client has sent and whether the data size is reasonable. Asignación de memoria sin restringir en Google Guava 11.0 hasta las versiones 24.x anteriores a la 24.1.1 permite que los atacantes remotos realicen ataques de denegación de servicio (DoS) contra servidores que dependen de esta librería y que deserialicen datos proporcionados por dichos atacantes debido a que la clase AtomicDoubleArray (cuando se serializa con serialización Java) y la clase CompoundOrdering (cuando se serializa con serialización GWT) realiza una asignación sin comprobar adecuadamente lo que ha enviado un cliente y si el tamaño de los datos es razonable. A vulnerability was found in Guava where the AtomicDoubleArray and CompoundOrdering classes were found to allocate memory based on size fields sent by the client without validation. A crafted message could cause the server to consume all available memory or crash leading to a denial of service. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041707 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2423 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2424 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2425 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2428 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2598 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2643 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2740 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2741 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:274 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2018-2840
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-2840
Vulnerability in the Oracle Retail Xstore Point of Service component of Oracle Retail Applications (subcomponent: Xstore Office). Supported versions that are affected are 6.5.11, 7.0.6, 7.1.6, 15.0.1 and 16.0.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Retail Xstore Point of Service. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Retail Xstore Point of Service accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Retail Xstore Point of Service accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Retail Xstore Point of Service. • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103786 •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 76%CPEs: 70EXPL: 4CVE-2018-1270 – spring-framework: Possible RCE via spring messaging
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1270
Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack. Spring Framework, en versiones 5.0 anteriores a la 5.0.5 y versiones 4.3 anteriores a la 4.3.15, así como versiones más antiguas no soportadas, permite que las aplicaciones expongan STOMP en endpoints WebSocket con un simple agente STOMP en memoria a través del módulo spring-messaging. Un usuario (o atacante) malicioso puede manipular un mensaje al agente que desemboca en un ataque de ejecución remota de código. Pivotal Spring Java Framework versions 5.0.x and below suffer from a remote code execution vulnerability. • https://github.com/CaledoniaProject/CVE-2018-1270 https://github.com/Venscor/CVE-2018-1270 https://github.com/tafamace/CVE-2018-1270 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103696 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2939 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4ed49b103f64a0cecb38064f26cbf1389afc12124653da2d35166dbe%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists& • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') CWE-358: Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 72EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1271 – spring-framework: Directory traversal vulnerability with static resources on Windows filesystems
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1271
Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to configure Spring MVC to serve static resources (e.g. CSS, JS, images). When static resources are served from a file system on Windows (as opposed to the classpath, or the ServletContext), a malicious user can send a request using a specially crafted URL that can lead a directory traversal attack. Spring Framework, en versiones 5.0 anteriores a la 5.0.5 y versiones 4.3 anteriores a la 4.3.15, así como versiones más antiguas no soportadas, permite que las aplicaciones configuren Spring MVC para que sirva recursos estáticos (por ejemplo, CSS, JS o imágenes). Cuando se sirven recursos estáticos desde un sistema de archivos en Windows (en contraposición a classpath o a ServletContext), un usuario malicioso puede enviar una petición mediante una URL especialmente manipulada que puede llevar a un ataque de salto de directorio. • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103699 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1320 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2669 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2939 https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2018-1271 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html https: • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1199 – spring-framework: Improper URL path validation allows for bypassing of security checks on static resources
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1199
Spring Security (Spring Security 4.1.x before 4.1.5, 4.2.x before 4.2.4, and 5.0.x before 5.0.1; and Spring Framework 4.3.x before 4.3.14 and 5.0.x before 5.0.3) does not consider URL path parameters when processing security constraints. By adding a URL path parameter with special encodings, an attacker may be able to bypass a security constraint. The root cause of this issue is a lack of clarity regarding the handling of path parameters in the Servlet Specification. Some Servlet containers include path parameters in the value returned for getPathInfo() and some do not. Spring Security uses the value returned by getPathInfo() as part of the process of mapping requests to security constraints. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2405 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4ed49b103f64a0cecb38064f26cbf1389afc12124653da2d35166dbe%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ab825fcade0b49becfa30235b3d54f4a51bb74ea96b6c9adb5d1378c%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/dcf8599b80e43a6b60482607adb76c64672772dc2d9209ae2170f369%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2018-1199 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html https://access.redhat.com& • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •