Page 12 of 64 results (0.020 seconds)

CVSS: 4.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 73EXPL: 0

The mod_dav_svn server in Subversion 1.5.0 through 1.7.19 and 1.8.0 through 1.8.11 allows remote authenticated users to spoof the svn:author property via a crafted v1 HTTP protocol request sequences. El servidor mod_dav_svn en Subversion 1.5.0 hasta 1.7.19 y 1.8.0 hasta 1.8.11 permite a usuarios remotos autenticados falsificar la propiedad svn:author a través de secuencias manipuladas de solicitudes del protocolo v1 HTTP. It was found that the mod_dav_svn module did not properly validate the svn:author property of certain requests. An attacker able to create new revisions could use this flaw to spoof the svn:author property. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-04/msg00008.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1633.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1742.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Jun/32 http://subversion.apache.org/security/CVE-2015-0251-advisory.txt http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3231 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:192 http://www.oracle.com& • CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity CWE-348: Use of Less Trusted Source •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 160EXPL: 0

The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, does not properly combine state data with key data during the initialization phase, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks against the initial bytes of a stream by sniffing network traffic that occasionally relies on keys affected by the Invariance Weakness, and then using a brute-force approach involving LSB values, aka the "Bar Mitzvah" issue. El algoritmo RC4, utilizado en el protocolo TLS y el protocolo SSL, no combina correctamente los datos de estados con los datos de claves durante la fase de inicialización, lo que facilita a atacantes remotos realizar ataques de recuperación de texto claro contra los bytes iniciales de un flujo mediante la captura de trafico de la red que ocasionalmente depende de claves afectadas por la debilidad de la invariabilidad (Invariance Weakness), y posteriormente utilizar un acercamiento de fuerza bruta que involucra valores LSB, también conocido como el problema de 'Bar Mitzvah'. • http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04779034 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10705 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10727 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00013.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00015.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00022.html • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •

CVSS: 3.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 30EXPL: 0

The krb5_ldap_get_password_policy_from_dn function in plugins/kdb/ldap/libkdb_ldap/ldap_pwd_policy.c in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.13.1, when the KDC uses LDAP, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a successful LDAP query with no results, as demonstrated by using an incorrect object type for a password policy. La función krb5_ldap_get_password_policy_from_dn en plugins/kdb/ldap/libkdb_ldap/ldap_pwd_policy.c en MIT Kerberos 5 (también conocido como krb5) anterior a 1.13.1, cuando el KDC utiliza LDAP, permite a usuarios remotos autenticados causar una denegación de servicio (caída del demonio) a través de una consulta LDAP con éxito pero sin resultados, tal y como fue demostrado mediante el uso de un tipo de objeto incorrecto para una política de contraseñas. If kadmind were used with an LDAP back end for the KDC database, a remote, authenticated attacker who has the permissions to set the password policy could crash kadmind by attempting to use a named ticket policy object as a password policy for a principal. • http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0536.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-April/155828.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-03/msg00061.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0439.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0794.html http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:009 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2015-2511959.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/71679 http://www.sec • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 89%CPEs: 345EXPL: 17

GNU Bash through 4.3 bash43-025 processes trailing strings after certain malformed function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to write to files or possibly have unknown other impact via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-6271. GNU Bash hasta 4.3 bash43-025 procesa cadenas finales después de la definición malformada de funciones en los valores de variables de entorno, lo que permite a atacantes remotos escribir hacia ficheros o posiblemente tener otro impacto desconocido a través de un entorno manipulado, tal y como se ha demostrado por vectores que involucran la característica ForceCommand en sshd OpenSSH, los módulos mod_cgi y mod_cgid en el Apache HTTP Server, scripts ejecutados por clientes DHCP no especificados, y otras situaciones en la cual establecer el entorno ocurre a través de un límite privilegiado de la ejecución de Bash. Nota: Esta vulnerabilidad existe debido a una solución incompleta para CVE-2014-6271. It was found that the fix for CVE-2014-6271 was incomplete, and Bash still allowed certain characters to be injected into other environments via specially crafted environment variables. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34777 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34895 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34839 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36503 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36504 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34766 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/35115 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36933 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34765 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34860 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34879 • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') CWE-228: Improper Handling of Syntactically Invalid Structure •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 97%CPEs: 345EXPL: 53

GNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution, aka "ShellShock." NOTE: the original fix for this issue was incorrect; CVE-2014-7169 has been assigned to cover the vulnerability that is still present after the incorrect fix. GNU Bash hasta la versión 4.3 procesa cadenas finales después de las definiciones de funciones en los valores de variables de entorno, lo que permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de un entorno manipulado, tal como se ha demostrado por vectores que involucran la característica ForceCommand en sshd OpenSSH, los módulos mod_cgi y mod_cgid en el Apache HTTP Server, scripts ejecutados por clientes DHCP no especificados, y otras situaciones en las cuales el ajuste de entorno ocurre a través de un límite privilegiado de la ejecución de Bash, también conocido como "ShellShock." NOTA: la reparación original para este problema era incorrecta; CVE-2014-7169 ha sido asignada para cubrir la vulnerabilidad que todavía está presente después de la solución incorrecta. A flaw was found in the way Bash evaluated certain specially crafted environment variables. • https://github.com/darrenmartyn/visualdoor https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/38849 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34777 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39918 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34895 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34839 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40619 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36503 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36504 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40938 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34900 https • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •