Page 12 of 255 results (0.015 seconds)

CVSS: 9.6EPSS: 1%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0

Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 8u92 and Java SE Embedded 8u91 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to Libraries, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-3610. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Oracle Java SE 8u92 y Java SE Embedded 8u91 permite a atacantes remotos afectar la confidencialidad, la integridad y la disponibilidad a través de vectores relacionados con Libraries, una vulnerabilidad diferente a CVE-2016-3610. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Oracle Java. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the implementation of MethodHandles' dropArguments method. Due to unsafe handling of reflection of privileged classes inside the MethodHandles class, it is possible for untrusted code to gain access to privileged methods and properties. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00033.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00034.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00035.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09 •

CVSS: 9.6EPSS: 1%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0

Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 7u101 and 8u92 and Java SE Embedded 8u91 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to Hotspot. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Oracle Java SE 7u101 y 8u92 y Java SE Embedded 8u91 permite a atacantes remotos afectar la confidencialidad, la integridad y disponibilidad a través de vectores relacionados con Hotspot. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Oracle Java. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the way the runtime evaluates uninitialized objects that are not compiler generated. Due to unsafe handling of privileged classes within the uninitialized objects, it is possible for untrusted code to gain access to privileged methods and properties. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00033.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00034.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00035.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00028. •

CVSS: 9.6EPSS: 1%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0

Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 8u92 and Java SE Embedded 8u91 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to Libraries, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-3598. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Oracle Java SE 8u92 y Java SE Embedded 8u91 permite a atacantes remotos afectar la confidencialidad, la integridad y la disponibilidad a través de vectores relacionados con Libraries, una vulnerabilidad diferente a CVE-2016-3598. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Oracle Java. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the implementation of MethodHandles.filterReturnValue. Due to unsafe handling of reflection of privileged classes inside the MethodHandles class, it is possible for untrusted code to gain access to privileged methods and properties. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00033.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00034.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00035.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00028. •

CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 92%CPEs: 21EXPL: 0

PHP through 7.0.8 does not attempt to address RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 namespace conflicts and therefore does not protect applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTP_PROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect an application's outbound HTTP traffic to an arbitrary proxy server via a crafted Proxy header in an HTTP request, as demonstrated by (1) an application that makes a getenv('HTTP_PROXY') call or (2) a CGI configuration of PHP, aka an "httpoxy" issue. PHP hasta la versión 7.0.8 no intenta abordar los conflictos de espacio de nombres de RFC 3875 sección 4.1.18 y por lo tanto no protege aplicaciones de la presencia de datos de clientes no confiables en ambiente variable de HTTP_PROXY, lo que ppodría permitir a atacantes remotos redireccionar el tráfico HTTP saliente de una aplicación a un servidor proxy arbitrario través de una cabecera Proxy manipulada en una petición HTTP, según lo demostrado por (1) una aplicación que hace una llamada getenv('HTTP_PROXY') o (2) una configuración CGI de PHP, también conocido como problema "httpoxy". It was discovered that PHP did not properly protect against the HTTP_PROXY variable name clash. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to redirect HTTP requests performed by a PHP script to an attacker-controlled proxy via a malicious HTTP request. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00003.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1609.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1610.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1611.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1612.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1613.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3631 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/797896 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-601: URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') •

CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 94%CPEs: 18EXPL: 0

Apache Tomcat 7.x through 7.0.70 and 8.x through 8.5.4, when the CGI Servlet is enabled, follows RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 and therefore does not protect applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTP_PROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect an application's outbound HTTP traffic to an arbitrary proxy server via a crafted Proxy header in an HTTP request, aka an "httpoxy" issue. NOTE: the vendor states "A mitigation is planned for future releases of Tomcat, tracked as CVE-2016-5388"; in other words, this is not a CVE ID for a vulnerability. Apache Tomcat, en versiones 7.x hasta la 7.0.70 y versiones 8.x hasta la 8.5.4, cuando el Servlet CGI está habilitado, sigue la sección 4.1.18 de RFC 3875 y, por lo tanto, no protege aplicaciones ante la presencia de datos de cliente no fiables en la variable de entorno HTTP_PROXY. Esto podría permitir que atacantes remotos redirijan el tráfico HTTP saliente de una aplicación a un servidor proxy arbitrario mediante una cabecera Proxy manipulada en una petición HTTP. Esto también se conoce como problema "httpoxy". • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-09/msg00025.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1624.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2045.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2046.html http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/797896 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2016-3090545.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91818 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/ • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-284: Improper Access Control •