CVE-2018-5381
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5381
The Quagga BGP daemon (bgpd) prior to version 1.2.3 has a bug in its parsing of "Capabilities" in BGP OPEN messages, in the bgp_packet.c:bgp_capability_msg_parse function. The parser can enter an infinite loop on invalid capabilities if a Multi-Protocol capability does not have a recognized AFI/SAFI, causing a denial of service. El demonio Quagga BGP (bgpd), en versiones anteriores a la 1.2.3, tiene un error en su análisis de "Capabilities" en los mensajes BGP OPEN, en la función bgp_packet.c:bgp_capability_msg_parse. El analizador puede entrar en un bucle infinito o invalidar capacidades si una capacidad Multi-Protocol no tiene un AFI/SAFI reconocido, lo que provocaría una denegación de servicio (DoS). • http://savannah.nongnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=9095 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/940439 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-451142.pdf https://gogs.quagga.net/Quagga/quagga/src/master/doc/security/Quagga-2018-1975.txt https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/02/msg00021.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201804-17 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3573-1 https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4115 • CWE-228: Improper Handling of Syntactically Invalid Structure CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') •
CVE-2018-5379 – quagga: Double free vulnerability in bgpd when processing certain forms of UPDATE message allowing to crash or potentially execute arbitrary code
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5379
The Quagga BGP daemon (bgpd) prior to version 1.2.3 can double-free memory when processing certain forms of UPDATE message, containing cluster-list and/or unknown attributes. A successful attack could cause a denial of service or potentially allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. El demonio Quagga BGP (bgpd), en versiones anteriores a la 1.2.3, puede realizar una doble liberación (double free) de memoria al procesar ciertos formularios de un mensaje UPDATE que contienen atributos cluster-list y/o desconocidos. Un ataque con éxito podría provocar una denegación de servicio (DoS) o permitir que un atacante ejecute código arbitrario. A double-free vulnerability was found in Quagga. • http://savannah.nongnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=9095 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/940439 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103105 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0377 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-451142.pdf https://gogs.quagga.net/Quagga/quagga/src/master/doc/security/Quagga-2018-1114.txt https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/02/msg00021.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201804-17 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3573-1 • CWE-415: Double Free CWE-416: Use After Free •
CVE-2017-12736
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-12736
A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROS for RSL910 devices (All versions < ROS V5.0.1), RUGGEDCOM ROS for all other devices (All versions < ROS V4.3.4), SCALANCE XB-200/XC-200/XP-200/XR300-WG (All versions between V3.0 (including) and V3.0.2 (excluding)), SCALANCE XR-500/XM-400 (All versions between V6.1 (including) and V6.1.1 (excluding)). After initial configuration, the Ruggedcom Discovery Protocol (RCDP) is still able to writeto the device under certain conditions, potentially allowing users located in the adjacentnetwork of the targeted device to perform unauthorized administrative actions. Se identificó una vulnerabilidad en RUGGEDCOM ROS para los dispositivos RSL910 (todas las versiones anteriores a ROS V5.0.1), RUGGEDCOM ROS para todos los demás dispositivos (todas las versiones anteriores a ROS V4.3.4), SCALANCE XB-200/XC-200/XP-200/XR300-WG (Todas las versiones entre V3.0 (incluido) y V3.0.2 (excluyendo), SCALANCE XR-500/XM-400 (Todas las versiones entre V6.1 (incluido) y V6.1.1 (excluyendo). Después de la configuración inicial, el Ruggedcom Discovery Protocol (RCDP) aún puede escribir hacia el dispositivo bajo ciertas condiciones, esto potencialmente permite que los usuarios ubicados en la red adyacente del dispositivo destino realicen acciones administrativas no autorizadas. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101041 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039463 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039464 https://www.siemens.com/cert/pool/cert/siemens_security_advisory_ssa-856721.pdf • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-665: Improper Initialization •
CVE-2017-14491 – Dnsmasq < 2.78 - 2-byte Heap Overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-14491
Heap-based buffer overflow in dnsmasq before 2.78 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or execute arbitrary code via a crafted DNS response. Un desbordamiento de búfer basado en memoria dinámica (heap) en dnsmasq en versiones anteriores a la 2.78 permite a los atacantes provocar una denegación de servicio (cierre inesperado) o ejecutar código arbitrario utilizando una respuesta DNS manipulada. A heap buffer overflow was found in dnsmasq in the code responsible for building DNS replies. An attacker could send crafted DNS packets to dnsmasq which would cause it to crash or, potentially, execute arbitrary code. Dnsmasq versions prior to 2.78 suffer from a 2-byte heap-based overflow vulnerability. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42941 https://github.com/skyformat99/dnsmasq-2.4.1-fix-CVE-2017-14491 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00006.html http://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/4560 http://nvidia.custhelp.com/a • CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVE-2015-5537
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-5537
The SSL layer of the HTTPS service in Siemens RuggedCom ROS before 4.2.0 and ROX II does not properly implement CBC padding, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain cleartext data via a padding-oracle attack, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-3566. Vulnerabilidad en la capa SSL del servicio HTTPS en Siemens RuggedCom ROS en versiones anteriores a 4.2.0 y ROX II, no implementa adecuadamente el padding en CBC, lo cual facilita a atacantes man-in-the-middle obtener texto plano a través de un ataque padding-oracle, vulnerabilidad diferente a CVE-2014-3566. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033022 http://www.siemens.com/innovation/pool/de/forschungsfelder/siemens_security_advisory_ssa-396873.pdf https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-15-202-03A • CWE-312: Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information •