CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2016-10003
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-10003
Incorrect HTTP Request header comparison in Squid HTTP Proxy 3.5.0.1 through 3.5.22, and 4.0.1 through 4.0.16 results in Collapsed Forwarding feature mistakenly identifying some private responses as being suitable for delivery to multiple clients. Comparación incorrecta del encabezado de HTTP Request en Squid HTTP Proxy 3.5.0.1 hasta la versión 3.5.22 y 4.0.1 hasta la versión 4.0.16 resulta en que la funcionalidad Collapsed Forwarding identifica de forma equivocada algunas respuestas privadas como adecuadas para la entrega a múltiples clientes. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/12/18/1 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94953 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037512 http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2016_10.txt • CWE-697: Incorrect Comparison •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 122EXPL: 0CVE-2016-10002 – squid: Information disclosure in HTTP request processing
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-10002
Incorrect processing of responses to If-None-Modified HTTP conditional requests in Squid HTTP Proxy 3.1.10 through 3.1.23, 3.2.0.3 through 3.5.22, and 4.0.1 through 4.0.16 leads to client-specific Cookie data being leaked to other clients. Attack requests can easily be crafted by a client to probe a cache for this information. Procesamiento incorrecto de respuestas a peticiones condicionales If-None-Modified HTTP en Squid HTTP Proxy 3.1.10 hasta la versión 3.1.23, 3.2.0.3 hasta la versión 3.5.22 y 4.0.1 hasta la versión 4.0.16 conduce a que datos Cookie de un cliente específico sean filtrados a otros clientes. Peticiones de ataque pueden ser fácilmente manipuladas por un cliente para probar una memoria caché para esta información. It was found that squid did not properly remove connection specific headers when answering conditional requests using a cached request. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0182.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0183.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3745 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/12/18/1 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94953 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037513 http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2016_11.txt https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-10002 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405941 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 8.6EPSS: 56%CPEs: 15EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4553 – squid: Cache poisoning issue in HTTP Request handling
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4553
client_side.cc in Squid before 3.5.18 and 4.x before 4.0.10 does not properly ignore the Host header when absolute-URI is provided, which allows remote attackers to conduct cache-poisoning attacks via an HTTP request. client_side.cc en Squid en versiones anteriores a 3.5.18 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.10 no ignora correctamente la cabecera Host cuando se proporciona una URI absoluta, lo que permite a atacantes remotos llevar a cabo ataques de envenenamiento de caché a través de una petición HTTP. An input validation flaw was found in the way Squid handled intercepted HTTP Request messages. An attacker could use this flaw to bypass the protection against issues related to CVE-2009-0801, and perform cache poisoning attacks on Squid. • http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4501 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinapr2016-2952096.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035768 http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2016_7.txt http& • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 3%CPEs: 148EXPL: 1CVE-2016-4555 – squid: SegFault from ESIInclude::Start
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4555
client_side_request.cc in Squid 3.x before 3.5.18 and 4.x before 4.0.10 allows remote servers to cause a denial of service (crash) via crafted Edge Side Includes (ESI) responses. client_side_request.cc en Squid 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.18 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.10 permite a servidores remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída) a través de respuestas Edge Side Includes (ESI) manipuladas. A NULL pointer dereference flaw was found in the way Squid processes ESI responses. If Squid was used as a reverse proxy or for TLS/HTTPS interception, a malicious server could use this flaw to crash the Squid worker process. • http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4455 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/06/5 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linu • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •
CVSS: 8.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4554 – squid: Header Smuggling issue in HTTP Request processing
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4554
mime_header.cc in Squid before 3.5.18 allows remote attackers to bypass intended same-origin restrictions and possibly conduct cache-poisoning attacks via a crafted HTTP Host header, aka a "header smuggling" issue. mime_header.cc en Squid en versiones anteriores a 3.5.18 permite a atacantes remotos eludir restricciones destinadas al mismo origen y posiblemente llevar a cabo ataques de envenenamiento de caché a través de una cabecera HTTP Host manipulada, también conocido como un problema "contrabando de peticiones". An input validation flaw was found in Squid's mime_get_header_field() function, which is used to search for headers within HTTP requests. An attacker could send an HTTP request from the client side with specially crafted header Host header that bypasses same-origin security protections, causing Squid operating as interception or reverse-proxy to contact the wrong origin server. It could also be used for cache poisoning for client not following RFC 7230. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinapr2016-2952096.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035769 http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2016_8.txt http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.1/changesets&# • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •