CVSS: 4.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: -EXPL: 0CVE-2024-6343
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-6343
A buffer overflow vulnerability in the CGI program of Zyxel ATP series firmware versions from V4.32 through V5.38, USG FLEX series firmware versions from V4.50 through V5.38, USG FLEX 50(W) series firmware versions from V4.16 through V5.38, and USG20(W)-VPN series firmware versions from V4.16 through V5.38 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrator privileges to cause denial of service (DoS) conditions by sending a crafted HTTP request to a vulnerable device. • https://www.zyxel.com/global/en/support/security-advisories/zyxel-security-advisory-for-multiple-vulnerabilities-in-firewalls-09-03-2024 • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: -EXPL: 0CVE-2024-5412
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-5412
A buffer overflow vulnerability in the library "libclinkc" of the Zyxel VMG8825-T50K firmware version 5.50(ABOM.8)C0 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to cause denial of service (DoS) conditions by sending a crafted HTTP request to a vulnerable device. • https://www.zyxel.com/global/en/support/security-advisories/zyxel-security-advisory-for-buffer-overflow-vulnerability-in-some-5g-nr-cpe-dsl-ethernet-cpe-fiber-ont-wifi-extender-and-security-router-devices-09-03-2024 • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: -EXPL: 0CVE-2024-41433
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-41433
This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input. NOTE: PingCAP maintains that the actual reproduction of this issue did not cause the security impact of service interruption to other users. They argue that this is a complex query bug and not a DoS vulnerability. • https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/issues/53796 https://gist.github.com/ycybfhb/eec3a1eefe4c85eb22f1bca6114359a1 • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: -EXPL: 0CVE-2024-41434
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-41434
This allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input to the 'RemoveUnnecessaryFirstRow', it will check the expression between 'Agg' and 'GroupBy', but does not check the return type. ... This allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input to the 'RemoveUnnecessaryFirstRow', it will check the expression between 'Agg' and 'GroupBy', but does not check the return type. NOTE: PingCAP disputes this, arguing that reproduction did not cause the security impact of service interruption to other users. They maintain it is a complex query bug in the product but not a DoS. • https://gist.github.com/ycybfhb/4aa6809695b9e8a1cd1429e597c17517 https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/issues/53733 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2024-45311 – Denial of service in quinn-proto when using `Endpoint::retry()`
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-45311
Quinn is a pure-Rust, async-compatible implementation of the IETF QUIC transport protocol. As of quinn-proto 0.11, it is possible for a server to `accept()`, `retry()`, `refuse()`, or `ignore()` an `Incoming` connection. ... This issue can go undetected until a server's `refuse()`/`ignore()` code path is exercised, such as to stop a denial of service attack. 2. • https://github.com/quinn-rs/quinn/security/advisories/GHSA-vr26-jcq5-fjj8 https://github.com/quinn-rs/quinn/commit/e01609ccd8738bd438d86fa7185a0f85598cb58f https://github.com/quinn-rs/quinn/blob/bb02a12a8435a7732a1d762783eeacbb7e50418e/quinn-proto/src/endpoint.rs#L213 • CWE-670: Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation •