Page 129 of 5157 results (0.015 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 10EXPL: 1

A vulnerability exists in curl <7.87.0 HSTS check that could be bypassed to trick it to keep using HTTP. Using its HSTS support, curl can be instructed to use HTTPS instead of using an insecure clear-text HTTP step even when HTTP is provided in the URL. However, the HSTS mechanism could be bypassed if the host name in the given URL first uses IDN characters that get replaced to ASCII counterparts as part of the IDN conversion. Like using the character UTF-8 U+3002 (IDEOGRAPHIC FULL STOP) instead of the common ASCII full stop (U+002E) `.`. Then in a subsequent request, it does not detect the HSTS state and makes a clear text transfer. • https://hackerone.com/reports/1755083 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TVWZW5CNSJ7UYAF2BGSYAWAEXDJYUBHA https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202310-12 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230427-0007 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-43551 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152639 • CWE-319: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 3EXPL: 1

JSON5 is an extension to the popular JSON file format that aims to be easier to write and maintain by hand (e.g. for config files). The `parse` method of the JSON5 library before and including versions 1.0.1 and 2.2.1 does not restrict parsing of keys named `__proto__`, allowing specially crafted strings to pollute the prototype of the resulting object. This vulnerability pollutes the prototype of the object returned by `JSON5.parse` and not the global Object prototype, which is the commonly understood definition of Prototype Pollution. However, polluting the prototype of a single object can have significant security impact for an application if the object is later used in trusted operations. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to set arbitrary and unexpected keys on the object returned from `JSON5.parse`. • https://github.com/json5/json5/issues/199 https://github.com/json5/json5/issues/295 https://github.com/json5/json5/pull/298 https://github.com/json5/json5/security/advisories/GHSA-9c47-m6qq-7p4h https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/11/msg00021.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3S26TLPLVFAJTUN3VIXFDEBEXDYO22CE https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-46175 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156263 • CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

After tar_close(), libtar.c releases the memory pointed to by pointer t. After tar_close() is called in the list() function, it continues to use pointer t: free_longlink_longname(t->th_buf) . As a result, the released memory is used (use-after-free). Después de tar_close(), libtar.c libera la memoria a la que apunta el puntero t. Después de llamar a tar_close() en la función list(), continúa usando el puntero t: free_longlink_longname(t-&gt;th_buf). • https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4S4PJRCJLEAWN2EKXGLSOBTL7O57V7NC https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7WX5YE66CT7Y5C2HTHXSFDKQWYWYWJ2T https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/cve/detail/?cveId=CVE-2021-33640&packageName=libtar • CWE-416: Use After Free •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0

An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.28.2 and 3.x before 3.3.0. There is a potential heap-based buffer overflow and heap-based buffer over-read in DTLS if MBEDTLS_SSL_DTLS_CONNECTION_ID is enabled and MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_IN_LEN_MAX > 2 * MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX. Se descubrió un problema en Mbed TLS anterior a 2.28.2 y 3.x anterior a 3.3.0. Existe un posible desbordamiento de búfer de almacenamiento dinámico y una sobrelectura de búfer de almacenamiento dinámico en DTLS si MBEDTLS_SSL_DTLS_CONNECTION_ID está habilitado y MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_IN_LEN_MAX &gt; 2 * MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX. • https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls/releases/tag/v2.28.2 https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls/releases/tag/v3.3.0 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4BR7ZCVKLPGCOEEALUHZMFHXQHR6S4QL https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6XMKJ5IMJEPXYAHHU56Z4P2FSYIEAESB https://mbed-tls.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tech-updates/security-advisories • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0

An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.28.2 and 3.x before 3.3.0. An adversary with access to precise enough information about memory accesses (typically, an untrusted operating system attacking a secure enclave) can recover an RSA private key after observing the victim performing a single private-key operation, if the window size (MBEDTLS_MPI_WINDOW_SIZE) used for the exponentiation is 3 or smaller. Se descubrió un problema en Mbed TLS anterior a 2.28.2 y 3.x anterior a 3.3.0. Un adversario con acceso a información suficientemente precisa sobre los accesos a la memoria (normalmente, un sistema operativo no confiable que ataca un enclave seguro) puede recuperar una clave privada RSA después de observar a la víctima realizando una única operación con clave privada, si el tamaño de la ventana (MBEDTLS_MPI_WINDOW_SIZE) utilizada para la exponenciación es 3 o menor. • https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls/releases/tag/v2.28.2 https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls/releases/tag/v3.3.0 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4BR7ZCVKLPGCOEEALUHZMFHXQHR6S4QL https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6XMKJ5IMJEPXYAHHU56Z4P2FSYIEAESB • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •