CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2018-11645 – ghostscript: status command permitted with -dSAFER in psi/zfile.c allowing attackers to identify the size and existence of files
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-11645
psi/zfile.c in Artifex Ghostscript before 9.21rc1 permits the status command even if -dSAFER is used, which might allow remote attackers to determine the existence and size of arbitrary files, a similar issue to CVE-2016-7977. psi/zfile.c en Artifex Ghostscript en versiones anteriores a la 9.21rc1 permite el comando status incluso si se emplea -dSAFER, lo que podría permitir que atacantes remotos determinen la existencia y tamaño de archivos arbitrarios. Este problema es similar a CVE-2016-7977. Ghostscript did not honor the -dSAFER option when executing the "status" instruction, which can be used to retrieve information such as a file's existence and size. A specially crafted postscript document could use this flow to gain information on the targeted system's filesystem content. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=b60d50b7567369ad856cebe1efb6cd7dd2284219 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2281 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697193 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00015.html https://usn.ubuntu.com/3768-1 https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4336 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-11645 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585914 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 2%CPEs: 13EXPL: 0CVE-2018-10194 – ghostscript: Stack-based out-of-bounds write in pdf_set_text_matrix function in gdevpdts.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-10194
The set_text_distance function in devices/vector/gdevpdts.c in the pdfwrite component in Artifex Ghostscript through 9.22 does not prevent overflows in text-positioning calculation, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted PDF document. La función set_text_distance en devices/vector/gdevpdts.c en el componente pdfwrite en Artifex Ghostscript, hasta la versión 9.22, no evita los desbordamientos en el cálculo de posicionamiento de texto. Esto permite que atacantes remotos provoquen una denegación de servicio (cierre inesperado de la aplicación) u otro tipo de impacto sin especificar mediante un documento PDF manipulado. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=39b1e54b2968620723bf32e96764c88797714879 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040729 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2918 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699255 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/04/msg00028.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-12 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3636-1 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-10194 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1569108 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 52%CPEs: 20EXPL: 2CVE-2017-8291 – Artifex Ghostscript Type Confusion Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-8291
Artifex Ghostscript through 2017-04-26 allows -dSAFER bypass and remote command execution via .rsdparams type confusion with a "/OutputFile (%pipe%" substring in a crafted .eps document that is an input to the gs program, as exploited in the wild in April 2017. Artifex Ghostscript permite sobrepasar -dSAFER y la ejecución de comandos remotos a través de una vulnerabilidad de type confusion en .rsdparams con una subcadena "/ OutputFile (% pipe%" en un documento .eps que se utilice como entrada al gs. It was found that ghostscript did not properly validate the parameters passed to the .rsdparams and .eqproc functions. During its execution, a specially crafted PostScript document could execute code in the context of the ghostscript process, bypassing the -dSAFER protection. Artifex Ghostscript allows -dSAFER bypass and remote command execution via .rsdparams type confusion with a "/OutputFile. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/41955 http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/04/28/2 http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3838 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98476 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1230 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697808 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446063 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036453 https://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=04b37bbce174eed24edec7ad5b920eb93db4d47d • CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 5%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2016-8602 – ghostscript: check for sufficient params in .sethalftone5
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-8602
The .sethalftone5 function in psi/zht2.c in Ghostscript before 9.21 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted Postscript document that calls .sethalftone5 with an empty operand stack. La función .sethalftone5 en psi/zht2.c en Ghostscript en versiones anteriores a 9.21 permite a los atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída de la aplicación) o posiblemente ejecutar código arbitrario a través de un documento Postscript que llama a .sethalftone5 con una pila de operandos vacía. It was found that ghostscript did not sufficiently check the validity of parameters given to the .sethalftone5 function. A specially crafted postscript document could cause a crash, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the gs process. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=f5c7555c303 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0013.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0014.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3691 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/10/11/5 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/10/11/7 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95311 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697203 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi&# • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-704: Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 10%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2016-7979 – ghostscript: Type confusion in .initialize_dsc_parser allows remote code execution
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-7979
Ghostscript before 9.21 might allow remote attackers to bypass the SAFER mode protection mechanism and consequently execute arbitrary code by leveraging type confusion in .initialize_dsc_parser. Ghostscript versiones anteriores a 9.21 podría permitir que los atacantes remotos pasaran por alto el mecanismo de protección del modo SAFER y, en consecuencia, ejecutar código arbitrario mediante el aprovechamiento de la confusión de tipos en .initialize_dsc_parser. It was found that the ghostscript function .initialize_dsc_parser did not validate its parameter before using it, allowing a type confusion flaw. A specially crafted postscript document could cause a crash code execution in the context of the gs process. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Bh=875a0095f37626a721c7ff57d606a0f95af03913 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0013.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0014.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3691 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/10/05/15 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95337 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697190 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201702-31 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-7979 h • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-704: Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast •