CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 10%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2016-7979 – ghostscript: Type confusion in .initialize_dsc_parser allows remote code execution
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-7979
Ghostscript before 9.21 might allow remote attackers to bypass the SAFER mode protection mechanism and consequently execute arbitrary code by leveraging type confusion in .initialize_dsc_parser. Ghostscript versiones anteriores a 9.21 podría permitir que los atacantes remotos pasaran por alto el mecanismo de protección del modo SAFER y, en consecuencia, ejecutar código arbitrario mediante el aprovechamiento de la confusión de tipos en .initialize_dsc_parser. It was found that the ghostscript function .initialize_dsc_parser did not validate its parameter before using it, allowing a type confusion flaw. A specially crafted postscript document could cause a crash code execution in the context of the gs process. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Bh=875a0095f37626a721c7ff57d606a0f95af03913 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0013.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0014.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3691 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/10/05/15 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95337 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697190 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201702-31 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-7979 h • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-704: Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast •
CVSS: 6.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2016-7977 – ghostscript: .libfile does not honor -dSAFER
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-7977
Ghostscript before 9.21 might allow remote attackers to bypass the SAFER mode protection mechanism and consequently read arbitrary files via the use of the .libfile operator in a crafted postscript document. Ghostscript anterior a la versión 9.21 podría permitir que los atacantes remotos eludieran el mecanismo de protección del modo SAFER y, en consecuencia, leyeran archivos arbitrarios mediante el uso del operador .libfile en un documento Postscript manipulado. It was found that ghostscript function .libfile did not honor the -dSAFER option, usually used when processing untrusted documents, leading to information disclosure. A specially crafted postscript document could, in the context of the gs process, retrieve file content on the target machine. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=8abd22010eb4db0fb1b10e430d5f5d83e015ef70 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0013.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0014.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3691 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/29/28 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/10/05/15 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95334 https:/ • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 4.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2010-4820 – ghostscript: CWD included in the default library search path
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2010-4820
Untrusted search path vulnerability in Ghostscript 8.62 allows local users to execute arbitrary PostScript code via a Trojan horse Postscript library file in Encoding/ under the current working directory, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-2055. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Ghostscript 8.62 permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código PostScript arbitrario a través de un fichero troyano de la librería Postscript en Encoding/ bajo el directorio de trabajo actual, una vulnerabilidad diferente a CVE-2010-2055. • http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691339 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0095.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0096.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/01/04/7 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/511433 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/51847 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599564 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771853 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2010-4820 • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •
CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 1%CPEs: 23EXPL: 0CVE-2009-0792 – argyllcms: Incomplete fix for CVE-2009-0583
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-0792
Multiple integer overflows in icc.c in the International Color Consortium (ICC) Format library (aka icclib), as used in Ghostscript 8.64 and earlier and Argyll Color Management System (CMS) 1.0.3 and earlier, allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code by using a device file for a translation request that operates on a crafted image file and targets a certain "native color space," related to an ICC profile in a (1) PostScript or (2) PDF file with embedded images. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2009-0583. Múltiples desbordamientos de entero en icc.c en el International Color Consortium (ICC) Format library (también conocido como icclib), como lo utilizado en Ghostscript v8.64 y versiones anteriores y Argyll Color Management System (CMS) v1.0.3 y versiones anteriores, permite a atacantes dependientes de contexto provocar una denegación de servicio (desbordamiento de búfer basado en montículo y caída de aplicación) o posiblemente ejecutar código de su elección utilizado un fichero de dispositivo para una petición de traducción que opera en un fichero de imagen manipulado y tiene como objetivo un determinado "espacio de color nativo," relacionado con un perfil ICC en un (1) PostScript o (2) fichero PDF file with embedded image con imágenes embebidas. NOTA: esta cuestión existe debido a una modificación inicial imcompleta de CVE-2009-0583. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-04/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-06/msg00003.html http://secunia.com/advisories/34373 http://secunia.com/advisories/34667 http://secunia.com/advisories/34711 http://secunia.com/advisories/34726 http://secunia.com/advisories/34729 http://secunia.com/advisories/34732 http://secunia.com/advisories/35416 http://secunia.com/advisories/35559 http://secunia.com/advisories/35569 http://sec • CWE-189: Numeric Errors •
CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 13%CPEs: 14EXPL: 2CVE-2009-0196 – ghostscript: Missing boundary check in Ghostscript's jbig2dec library
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-0196
Heap-based buffer overflow in the big2_decode_symbol_dict function (jbig2_symbol_dict.c) in the JBIG2 decoding library (jbig2dec) in Ghostscript 8.64, and probably earlier versions, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a PDF file with a JBIG2 symbol dictionary segment with a large run length value. Desbordamiento de entero en la función big2_decode_symbol_dict (jbig2_symbol_dict.c) en la librería de decodificación JBIG2 (jbig2dec) en Ghostscript 8.64 y posiblemente versiones anteriores, permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código de su elección mediante un fichero PDF que contenga un segmento de diccionario de símbolos JBIG2 con un valor grande de longitud de repetición(run length). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-04/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-06/msg00003.html http://osvdb.org/53492 http://secunia.com/advisories/34292 http://secunia.com/advisories/34667 http://secunia.com/advisories/34729 http://secunia.com/advisories/34732 http://secunia.com/advisories/35416 http://secunia.com/advisories/35559 http://secunia.com/advisories/35569 http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2009-21 http://secur • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •