Page 13 of 64 results (0.020 seconds)

CVSS: 8.5EPSS: 90%CPEs: 256EXPL: 0

CVE-2012-1667 – bind: handling of zero length rdata can cause named to terminate unexpectedly

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2012-1667

ISC BIND 9.x before 9.7.6-P1, 9.8.x before 9.8.3-P1, 9.9.x before 9.9.1-P1, and 9.4-ESV and 9.6-ESV before 9.6-ESV-R7-P1 does not properly handle resource records with a zero-length RDATA section, which allows remote DNS servers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash or data corruption) or obtain sensitive information from process memory via a crafted record. ISC BIND v9.x antes de v9.7.6-P1, v9.8.x antes de v9.8.3-P1, v9.9.x antes de v9.9.1-P1, y v9.4-ESV antes de 9.6-ESV-R7-P1 no gestionan adecuadamente los registros de recursos con una sección RDATA de longitud cero, lo que permite a los servidores DNS remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída del demonio o corrupción de datos) u obtener información sensible de la memoria del proceso a través de un registro específicamente diseñado para este fin. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2012/Sep/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-06/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-06/msg00010.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=134132772016230&w=2 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0717.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1110.html http://secunia.com/advisories/51096 http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5501 http://www.debian.org/security/2012&#x • CWE-189: Numeric Errors •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 10%CPEs: 239EXPL: 0

CVE-2011-4313 – bind: Remote denial of service against recursive servers via logging negative cache entry

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2011-4313

query.c in ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.6.x, 9.4-ESV through 9.4-ESV-R5, 9.6-ESV through 9.6-ESV-R5, 9.7.0 through 9.7.4, 9.8.0 through 9.8.1, and 9.9.0a1 through 9.9.0b1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and named exit) via unknown vectors related to recursive DNS queries, error logging, and the caching of an invalid record by the resolver. query.c en ISC BIND v9.0.x hasta v9.6.x, v9.4-ESV hasta v9.4-ESV-R5, v9.6-ESV hasta v9.6-ESV-R5, v9.7.0 hasta v9.7.4, v9.8.0 hasta v9.8.1, y v9.9.0a1 hasta v9.9.0b1, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio a través de vectores relacionados con peticiones DNS recursivas, errores de registro, y la captura de un registro inválido por el 'resolver'. • http://blogs.oracle.com/sunsecurity/entry/cve_2011_4313_denial_of http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2012/Sep/msg00004.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-November/069463.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-November/069970.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-November/069975.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-11/msg00027.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce •

CVSS: 7.6EPSS: 4%CPEs: 168EXPL: 0

CVE-2010-0382 – bind: out-of-bailiwick data vulnerability due to regression while fixing CVE-2009-4022

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2010-0382

ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 before 9.6.1-P3, and 9.7.0 beta handles out-of-bailiwick data accompanying a secure response without re-fetching from the original source, which allows remote attackers to have an unspecified impact via a crafted response, aka Bug 20819. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of a regression during the fix for CVE-2009-4022. ISC BIND 9.0.x a 9.3.x, 9.4 en versiones anteriores a la 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 en versiones anteriores a la 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 en versiones anteriores a la 9.6.1-P3, y 9.7.0 beta maneja de manera inapropiada los datos de acompañamiento de una respuesta segura sin volver a consultar a la fuente original, lo que permite a atacantes remotos tener un impacto no especificado mediante una respuesta manipulada, también conocido como Bug 20819. NOTA: esta vulnerabilidad existe debido a una regresión durante la solución de CVE-2009-4022. • http://secunia.com/advisories/40086 http://wiki.rpath.com/wiki/Advisories:rPSA-2010-0018 http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2054 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0622 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1352 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11753 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A6665 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval •

CVSS: 4.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 168EXPL: 0

CVE-2010-0290 – BIND upstream fix for CVE-2009-4022 is incomplete

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2010-0290

Unspecified vulnerability in ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 before 9.6.1-P3, and 9.7.0 beta, with DNSSEC validation enabled and checking disabled (CD), allows remote attackers to conduct DNS cache poisoning attacks by receiving a recursive client query and sending a response that contains (1) CNAME or (2) DNAME records, which do not have the intended validation before caching, aka Bug 20737. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2009-4022. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en ISC BIND 9.0.x a 9.3.x, 9.4 en versiones anteriores a la 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 en versiones anteriores a la 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 en versiones anteriores a la 9.6.1-P3, y 9.7.0 beta, con la validación DNSSEC habilitada y el chequeo (CD) deshabilitado, permite a atacantes remotos realizar ataques de envenenamiento de cache DNS mediante la recepción de una petición recursiva de cliente y el envío de una respuesta que contiene registros (1) CNAME o (2) DNAME, los cuales no realizan la validación establecida antes de cachear, también conocida como Bug 20737. NOTA: esta vulnerabilidad existe debido a una solución incompleta de CVE-2009-4022. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-01/msg00009.html http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=126393609503704&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=126399602810086&w=2 http://secunia.com/advisories/38219 http://secunia.com/advisories/38240 http://secunia.com/advisories/40086 http://wiki.rpath.com/wiki/Advisories:rPSA-2010-0018 http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2054 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:021 http://www.ubuntu&# •