CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2021-3667 – libvirt: Improper locking on ACL failure in virStoragePoolLookupByTargetPath API
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-3667
An improper locking issue was found in the virStoragePoolLookupByTargetPath API of libvirt. It occurs in the storagePoolLookupByTargetPath function where a locked virStoragePoolObj object is not properly released on ACL permission failure. Clients connecting to the read-write socket with limited ACL permissions could use this flaw to acquire the lock and prevent other users from accessing storage pool/volume APIs, resulting in a denial of service condition. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. Se ha encontrado un problema de bloqueo inapropiado en la API virStoragePoolLookupByTargetPath de libvirt. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986094 https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/commit/447f69dec47e1b0bd15ecd7cd49a9fd3b050fb87 https://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=447f69dec47e1b0bd15ecd7cd49a9fd3b050fb87 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/04/msg00000.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-06 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220331-0005 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3667 • CWE-667: Improper Locking •
CVSS: 7.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 18EXPL: 0CVE-2021-41617 – openssh: privilege escalation when AuthorizedKeysCommand or AuthorizedPrincipalsCommand are configured
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-41617
sshd in OpenSSH 6.2 through 8.x before 8.8, when certain non-default configurations are used, allows privilege escalation because supplemental groups are not initialized as expected. Helper programs for AuthorizedKeysCommand and AuthorizedPrincipalsCommand may run with privileges associated with group memberships of the sshd process, if the configuration specifies running the command as a different user. sshd en OpenSSH versiones 6.2 hasta 8.x anteriores a 8.8, cuando son usadas determinadas configuraciones no predeterminadas, permite una escalada de privilegios porque los grupos complementarios no son inicializados como se espera. Los programas de ayuda para AuthorizedKeysCommand y AuthorizedPrincipalsCommand pueden ejecutarse con privilegios asociados a la pertenencia a grupos del proceso sshd, si la configuración especifica la ejecución del comando como un usuario diferente A flaw was found in OpenSSH. Helper programs for AuthorizedKeysCommand and AuthorizedPrincipalsCommand may run with privileges associated with group memberships of the sshd process, if the configuration specifies running the command as a different user. Depending on system configuration, inherited groups may allow AuthorizedKeysCommand/AuthorizedPrincipalsCommand helper programs to gain unintended privileges, potentially leading to local privilege escalation. • https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190975 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/12/msg00017.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6XJIONMHMKZDTMH6BQR5TNLF2WDCGWED https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KVI7RWM2JLNMWTOFK6BDUSGNOIPZYPUT https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/W44V2PFQH5YLRN6ZJTVRKAD7CU6CYYET https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20211014& • CWE-273: Improper Check for Dropped Privileges •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 27EXPL: 1CVE-2021-3733 – python: urllib: Regular expression DoS in AbstractBasicAuthHandler
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-3733
There's a flaw in urllib's AbstractBasicAuthHandler class. An attacker who controls a malicious HTTP server that an HTTP client (such as web browser) connects to, could trigger a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDOS) during an authentication request with a specially crafted payload that is sent by the server to the client. The greatest threat that this flaw poses is to application availability. Se presenta un fallo en la clase AbstractBasicAuthHandler de urllib. Un atacante que controle un servidor HTTP malicioso al que se conecte un cliente HTTP (como un navegador web), podría desencadenar una Denegación de Servicio por Expresión Regular (ReDOS) durante una petición de autenticación con una carga útil especialmente diseñada que sea enviada por el servidor al cliente. • https://bugs.python.org/issue43075 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1995234 https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/7215d1ae25525c92b026166f9d5cac85fb https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24391 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/05/msg00024.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00039.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220407-0001 https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2021-3733 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3733 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 27EXPL: 1CVE-2021-3737 – python: urllib: HTTP client possible infinite loop on a 100 Continue response
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-3737
A flaw was found in python. An improperly handled HTTP response in the HTTP client code of python may allow a remote attacker, who controls the HTTP server, to make the client script enter an infinite loop, consuming CPU time. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. Se ha encontrado un fallo en python. Una respuesta HTTP manejada inapropiadamente en el código del cliente HTTP de python puede permitir a un atacante remoto, que controle el servidor HTTP, hacer que el script del cliente entre en un bucle infinito, consumiendo tiempo de CPU. • https://bugs.python.org/issue44022 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1995162 https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25916 https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/26503 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/05/msg00024.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00039.html https://python-security.readthedocs.io/vuln/urllib-100-continue-loop.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220407-0009 https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2021-3737 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 2%CPEs: 5EXPL: 2CVE-2016-20012
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-20012
OpenSSH through 8.7 allows remote attackers, who have a suspicion that a certain combination of username and public key is known to an SSH server, to test whether this suspicion is correct. This occurs because a challenge is sent only when that combination could be valid for a login session. NOTE: the vendor does not recognize user enumeration as a vulnerability for this product ** EN DISPTUTA ** OpenSSH versiones hasta 8.7, permite a atacantes remotos, que presentan la sospecha de que una determinada combinación de nombre de usuario y clave pública es conocida por un servidor SSH, comprobar si esta sospecha es correcta. Esto ocurre porque es enviado un desafío sólo cuando esa combinación podría ser válida para una sesión de inicio de sesión. NOTA: el proveedor no reconoce la enumeración de usuarios como una vulnerabilidad para este producto • https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/blob/d0fffc88c8fe90c1815c6f4097bc8cbcabc0f3dd/auth2-pubkey.c#L261-L265 https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/pull/270 https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/pull/270#issuecomment-920577097 https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/pull/270#issuecomment-943909185 https://rushter.com/blog/public-ssh-keys https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20211014-0005 https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/tech/SSHKeysAreInfoLeak https://www.openwall.com/lists •