CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 97%CPEs: 54EXPL: 16CVE-2014-0160 – OpenSSL Information Disclosure Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-0160
The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug. Las implementaciones de (1) TLS y (2) DTLS en OpenSSL 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1g no manejan adecuadamente paquetes Heartbeat Extension, lo que permite a atacantes remotos obtener información sensible desde la memoria de proceso a través de paquetes manipulados que desencadenan una sobrelectura del buffer, según lo demostrado mediante la lectura de claves privadas, relacionado con d1_both.c y t1_lib.c, también conocido como bug Heartbleed. An information disclosure flaw was found in the way OpenSSL handled TLS and DTLS Heartbeat Extension packets. A malicious TLS or DTLS client or server could send a specially crafted TLS or DTLS Heartbeat packet to disclose a limited portion of memory per request from a connected client or server. Note that the disclosed portions of memory could potentially include sensitive information such as private keys. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32764 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32791 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32998 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32745 https://github.com/0x90/CVE-2014-0160 https://github.com/jdauphant/patch-openssl-CVE-2014-0160 https://github.com/caiqiqi/OpenSSL-HeartBleed-CVE-2014-0160-PoC https://github.com/obayesshelton/CVE-2014-0160-Scanner https://github.com/MrE-Fog/CVE-2014-0160-Chrome-Plugin https://github.com/Xyl2k/CVE-2014&# • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read CWE-201: Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data •
CVSS: 1.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 96EXPL: 0CVE-2014-0076
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-0076
The Montgomery ladder implementation in OpenSSL through 1.0.0l does not ensure that certain swap operations have a constant-time behavior, which makes it easier for local users to obtain ECDSA nonces via a FLUSH+RELOAD cache side-channel attack. La implementación de la escala Montgomery en OpenSSL hasta la versión 1.0.0l no asegura que ciertas operaciones de intercambio tengan un comportamiento constante en el tiempo, lo que facilita a usuarios locales obtener nonces ECDSA a través de un ataque de caché de canal lateral FLUSH+RELOAD. • http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0165.html http://eprint.iacr.org/2014/140 http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=2198be3483259de374f91e57d247d0fc667aef29 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10629 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-04/msg00007.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140266410314613&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140317760000786&w=2 http&# • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 2%CPEs: 25EXPL: 0CVE-2013-6450 – openssl: crash in DTLS renegotiation after packet loss
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-6450
The DTLS retransmission implementation in OpenSSL 1.0.0 before 1.0.0l and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1f does not properly maintain data structures for digest and encryption contexts, which might allow man-in-the-middle attackers to trigger the use of a different context and cause a denial of service (application crash) by interfering with packet delivery, related to ssl/d1_both.c and ssl/t1_enc.c. La implementación de retransmisión DTLS en OpenSSL través 0.9.8y y 1.x través 1.0.1e no mantiene adecuadamente las estructuras de datos para sumarios (hashes) y contextos de cifrado, lo que podría permitir a atacantes man-in-the-middle para activar el uso de un contexto diferente e interferir con la entrega de paquetes, relacionado con ssl/d1_both.c y ssl/t1_enc.c. • http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=34628967f1e65dc8f34e000f0f5518e21afbfc7b http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136470.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136473.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-01/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-01/msg00032.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0015.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Dec/23 http://security. • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 92%CPEs: 25EXPL: 0CVE-2013-6449 – openssl: crash when using TLS 1.2 caused by use of incorrect hash algorithm
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-6449
The ssl_get_algorithm2 function in ssl/s3_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.2 obtains a certain version number from an incorrect data structure, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via crafted traffic from a TLS 1.2 client. La función ssl_get_algorithm2 en ssl/s3_lib.c en OpenSSL anterior a v1.0.2 obtiene un cierto número de versión de una estructura de datos incorrectos, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída del demonio) a través de tráfico de red de un cliente TLS v1.2. • http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=ca989269a2876bae79393bd54c3e72d49975fc75 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-December/124833.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-December/124854.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-December/124858.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136470.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136473.html http://lists • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •
CVSS: 5.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 72EXPL: 0CVE-2013-0169 – SSL/TLS: CBC padding timing attack (lucky-13)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-0169
The TLS protocol 1.1 and 1.2 and the DTLS protocol 1.0 and 1.2, as used in OpenSSL, OpenJDK, PolarSSL, and other products, do not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a MAC check requirement during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, aka the "Lucky Thirteen" issue. El protocolo TLS v1.1 y v1.2 y el protocolo DTLS v1.0 y v1.2, tal como se utiliza en OpenSSL, OpenJDK, PolarSSL, y otros productos, no considera adecuadamente ataques a un requisito de verificación MAC durante el proceso de relleno CBC malformado, lo que permite a atacantes remotos para realizar ataques distintivos y los ataques de recuperación de texto plano través del análisis estadístico de los datos de tiempo de los paquetes hechos a mano, también conocido como el "Lucky Thirteen" de emisión. • http://blog.fuseyism.com/index.php/2013/02/20/security-icedtea-2-1-6-2-2-6-2-3-7-for-openjdk-7-released http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2013/Sep/msg00002.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-April/101366.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-02/msg00020.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-03/msg00000.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-03/msg00002.html http:/&#x • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •