CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 2%CPEs: 218EXPL: 4CVE-2019-11358 – jquery: Prototype pollution in object's prototype leading to denial of service, remote code execution, or property injection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-11358
jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution. If an unsanitized source object contained an enumerable __proto__ property, it could extend the native Object.prototype. jQuery, en versiones anteriores a 3.4.0, como es usado en Drupal, Backdrop CMS, y otros productos, maneja mal jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) debido a la contaminación de Object.prototype. Si un objeto fuente no sanitizado contenía una propiedad enumerable __proto__, podría extender el Object.prototype nativo. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability was found in jquery. Untrusted JSON passed to the `extend` function could lead to modifying objects up the prototype chain, including the global Object. • https://github.com/isacaya/CVE-2019-11358 https://github.com/ossf-cve-benchmark/CVE-2019-11358 https://github.com/Snorlyd/https-nj.gov---CVE-2019-11358 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00025.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152787/dotCMS-5.1.1-Vulnerable-Dependencies.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153237/RetireJS-CORS-Issue-Script-Execution.html http://packetstormsecurity.c • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 13EXPL: 0CVE-2019-0222 – activemq: Corrupt MQTT frame can cause broker shutdown
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-0222
In Apache ActiveMQ 5.0.0 - 5.15.8, unmarshalling corrupt MQTT frame can lead to broker Out of Memory exception making it unresponsive. En Apache ActiveMQ, desde la versión 5.0.0 hasta la 5.15.8, la deserialización de una trama MQTT corrupta puede conducir a una excepción de bróker fuera de memoria, haciendo que no responda. • http://activemq.apache.org/security-advisories.data/CVE-2019-0222-announcement.txt http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/03/27/2 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107622 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/03f91b1fb85686a848cee6b90112cf6059bd1b21b23bacaa11a962e1%40%3Cdev.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2b5c0039197a4949f29e1e2c9441ab38d242946b966f61c110808bcc%40%3Ccommits.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/71640324661c1b6d0b6708bd4fb20170e1b979370a4b8cddc4f8d485%40%3Cdev.activemq.apache.org •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 1%CPEs: 180EXPL: 0CVE-2019-1559 – 0-byte record padding oracle
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-1559
If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00049.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00080.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107174 https://access. • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2019-2399
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-2399
Vulnerability in the Oracle Communications Diameter Signaling Router (DSR) component of Oracle Communications Applications (subcomponent: Security). The supported version that is affected is prior to 8.3. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Communications Diameter Signaling Router (DSR). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Communications Diameter Signaling Router (DSR) accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Communications Diameter Signaling Router (DSR). CVSS 3.0 Base Score 6.5 (Confidentiality and Availability impacts). • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2019-5072801.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106580 •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 114EXPL: 0CVE-2018-15756 – DoS Attack via Range Requests
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-15756
Spring Framework, version 5.1, versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.10, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.20, and older unsupported versions on the 4.2.x branch provide support for range requests when serving static resources through the ResourceHttpRequestHandler, or starting in 5.0 when an annotated controller returns an org.springframework.core.io.Resource. A malicious user (or attacker) can add a range header with a high number of ranges, or with wide ranges that overlap, or both, for a denial of service attack. This vulnerability affects applications that depend on either spring-webmvc or spring-webflux. Such applications must also have a registration for serving static resources (e.g. JS, CSS, images, and others), or have an annotated controller that returns an org.springframework.core.io.Resource. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105703 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/339fd112517e4873695b5115b96acdddbfc8f83b10598528d37c7d12%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77886fec378ee6064debb1efb6b464a4a0173b2ff0d151ed86d3a228%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7b156ee50ba3ecce87b33c06bf7a749d84ffee55e69bfb5eca88fcc3%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8a1fe70534fc52ff5c9db5ac29c55657f802cbefd7e9d9850c7052bd%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/ • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •