CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 1CVE-2021-28957 – python-lxml: Missing input sanitization for formaction HTML5 attributes may lead to XSS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-28957
An XSS vulnerability was discovered in python-lxml's clean module versions before 4.6.3. When disabling the safe_attrs_only and forms arguments, the Cleaner class does not remove the formaction attribute allowing for JS to bypass the sanitizer. A remote attacker could exploit this flaw to run arbitrary JS code on users who interact with incorrectly sanitized HTML. This issue is patched in lxml 4.6.3. Se ha descubierto una vulnerabilidad XSS en las versiones del módulo clean de python-lxml anteriores a la versión 4.6.3. • https://bugs.launchpad.net/lxml/+bug/1888153 https://github.com/lxml/lxml/commit/a5f9cb52079dc57477c460dbe6ba0f775e14a999 https://github.com/lxml/lxml/pull/316/commits/10ec1b4e9f93713513a3264ed6158af22492f270 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/03/msg00031.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3C2R44VDUY7FJVMAVRZ2WY7XYL4SVN45 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XXN3QPWCTQVOGW4BMWV3AUUZZ4NRZNSQ https://security • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 38EXPL: 0CVE-2021-23841 – Null pointer deref in X509_issuer_and_serial_hash()
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-23841
The OpenSSL public API function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() attempts to create a unique hash value based on the issuer and serial number data contained within an X509 certificate. However it fails to correctly handle any errors that may occur while parsing the issuer field (which might occur if the issuer field is maliciously constructed). This may subsequently result in a NULL pointer deref and a crash leading to a potential denial of service attack. The function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() is never directly called by OpenSSL itself so applications are only vulnerable if they use this function directly and they use it on certificates that may have been obtained from untrusted sources. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1i and below are affected by this issue. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/May/67 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/May/68 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/May/70 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=122a19ab48091c657f7cb1fb3af9fc07bd557bbf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=8252ee4d90f3f2004d3d0aeeed003ad49c9a7807 https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44846 https://security.gentoo.org/gls • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 15EXPL: 0CVE-2021-23839 – Incorrect SSLv2 rollback protection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-23839
OpenSSL 1.0.2 supports SSLv2. If a client attempts to negotiate SSLv2 with a server that is configured to support both SSLv2 and more recent SSL and TLS versions then a check is made for a version rollback attack when unpadding an RSA signature. Clients that support SSL or TLS versions greater than SSLv2 are supposed to use a special form of padding. A server that supports greater than SSLv2 is supposed to reject connection attempts from a client where this special form of padding is present, because this indicates that a version rollback has occurred (i.e. both client and server support greater than SSLv2, and yet this is the version that is being requested). The implementation of this padding check inverted the logic so that the connection attempt is accepted if the padding is present, and rejected if it is absent. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=30919ab80a478f2d81f2e9acdcca3fa4740cd547 https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44846 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210219-0009 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006 https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210216.txt https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html&# • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2021-20227
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-20227
A flaw was found in SQLite's SELECT query functionality (src/select.c). This flaw allows an attacker who is capable of running SQL queries locally on the SQLite database to cause a denial of service or possible code execution by triggering a use-after-free. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. Se encontró un fallo en la funcionalidad de consulta SELECT de SQLite (src/select.c). Este fallo permite a un atacante que es capaz de ejecutar consultas SQL localmente en la base de datos SQLite causar una denegación de servicio o una posible ejecución de código desencadenando un uso de la memoria previamente liberada. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924886 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202103-04 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-40 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210423-0010 https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html https://www.sqlite.org/releaselog/3_34_1.html • CWE-416: Use After Free •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 4%CPEs: 15EXPL: 1CVE-2021-3177 – python: Stack-based buffer overflow in PyCArg_repr in _ctypes/callproc.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-3177
Python 3.x through 3.9.1 has a buffer overflow in PyCArg_repr in _ctypes/callproc.c, which may lead to remote code execution in certain Python applications that accept floating-point numbers as untrusted input, as demonstrated by a 1e300 argument to c_double.from_param. This occurs because sprintf is used unsafely. Python versiones 3.x hasta 3.9.1, presenta un desbordamiento de búfer en la función PyCArg_repr en el archivo _ctypes/callproc.c, que puede conllevar a una ejecución de código remota en determinadas aplicaciones de Python que aceptan números de punto flotante como entrada no confiable, como es demostrado por un argumento 1e300 para c_double.from_param. Esto ocurre porque sprintf es usado de manera no segura A flaw was found in python. A stack-based buffer overflow was discovered in the ctypes module provided within Python. • https://bugs.python.org/issue42938 https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24239 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772%40%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/04/msg00005.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/02/msg00013.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/05/msg00024.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BRHOCQYX3QLDGDQGTWQAUUT2G • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •