CVE-2018-12022 – jackson-databind: improper polymorphic deserialization of types from Jodd-db library
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-12022
An issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind prior to 2.7.9.4, 2.8.11.2, and 2.9.6. When Default Typing is enabled (either globally or for a specific property), the service has the Jodd-db jar (for database access for the Jodd framework) in the classpath, and an attacker can provide an LDAP service to access, it is possible to make the service execute a malicious payload. Se ha descubierto un problema en FasterXML jackson-databind, en versiones anteriores a la 2.7.9.4, 2.8.11.2 y 2.9.6. Cuando "Default Typing" está habilitado (globalmente o para una propiedad en concreto), el servicio cuenta con el jar Jodd-db (para acceso a la base de datos del framework Jodd) en la ruta de clase; un atacante puede proporcionar un servicio LDAP para acceder y es posible hacer que el servicio ejecute una carga útil maliciosa. A vulnerability was discovered in jackson-databind where it would permit deserialization of a malicious object using Jodd DB connection classes when using DefaultTyping. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107585 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0959 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0782 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0877 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1106 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1107 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1108 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1140 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1782 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1797& • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVE-2018-12023 – jackson-databind: improper polymorphic deserialization of types from Oracle JDBC driver
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-12023
An issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind prior to 2.7.9.4, 2.8.11.2, and 2.9.6. When Default Typing is enabled (either globally or for a specific property), the service has the Oracle JDBC jar in the classpath, and an attacker can provide an LDAP service to access, it is possible to make the service execute a malicious payload. Se ha descubierto un problema en FasterXML jackson-databind, en versiones anteriores a la 2.7.9.4, 2.8.11.2 y 2.9.6. Cuando "Default Typing" está habilitado (globalmente o para una propiedad en concreto), el servicio cuenta con el jar Oracle JDBC en la ruta de clase; un atacante puede proporcionar un servicio LDAP para acceder y es posible hacer que el servicio ejecute una carga útil maliciosa. A vulnerability was discovered in jackson-databind where it would permit deserialization of a malicious object using Oracle JDBC classes when using DefaultTyping. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105659 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0959 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0782 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0877 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1106 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1107 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1108 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1140 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1782 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1797& • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVE-2019-1559 – 0-byte record padding oracle
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-1559
If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00049.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00080.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107174 https://access. • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •
CVE-2019-3822 – curl: NTLMv2 type-3 header stack buffer overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-3822
libcurl versions from 7.36.0 to before 7.64.0 are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow. The function creating an outgoing NTLM type-3 header (`lib/vauth/ntlm.c:Curl_auth_create_ntlm_type3_message()`), generates the request HTTP header contents based on previously received data. The check that exists to prevent the local buffer from getting overflowed is implemented wrongly (using unsigned math) and as such it does not prevent the overflow from happening. This output data can grow larger than the local buffer if very large 'nt response' data is extracted from a previous NTLMv2 header provided by the malicious or broken HTTP server. Such a 'large value' needs to be around 1000 bytes or more. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106950 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3701 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3822 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-436177.pdf https://curl.haxx.se/docs/CVE-2019-3822.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8338a0f605bdbb3a6098bb76f666a95fc2b2f53f37fa1ecc89f1146f%40%3Cdevnull.infra.apache.org%3E https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201903-03 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190315-0001 https://security.n • CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVE-2019-7317 – libpng: use-after-free in png_image_free in png.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-7317
png_image_free in png.c in libpng 1.6.x before 1.6.37 has a use-after-free because png_image_free_function is called under png_safe_execute. La función png_image_free en el archivo png.c en libpng versiones 1.6.x anteriores a 1.6.37, presenta un uso de la memoria previamente liberada porque la función png_image_free_function es llamada bajo png_safe_execute. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00029.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00084.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00038.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00044.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152561/Slackware-Security-Advisory-libpng-Updates.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108098 https:/ • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-416: Use After Free •