CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 47EXPL: 0CVE-2016-3710 – qemu: incorrect banked access bounds checking in vga module
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3710
The VGA module in QEMU improperly performs bounds checking on banked access to video memory, which allows local guest OS administrators to execute arbitrary code on the host by changing access modes after setting the bank register, aka the "Dark Portal" issue. El módulo VGA en QEMU lleva a cabo incorrectamente comprobaciones de límites sobre acceso almacenado a la memoria de vídeo, lo que permite a administradores locales de SO invitado ejecutar código arbitrario sobre el anfitrión cambiando los modos de acceso después de establecer el banco de registros, también conocido como el problema "Dark Portal". An out-of-bounds read/write access flaw was found in the way QEMU's VGA emulation with VESA BIOS Extensions (VBE) support performed read/write operations using I/O port methods. A privileged guest user could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code on the host with the privileges of the host's QEMU process. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0724.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0725.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0997.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0999.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1000.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1001.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1002.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1019.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1943.html http://suppor • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 93%CPEs: 84EXPL: 1CVE-2016-3718 – ImageMagick Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3718
The (1) HTTP and (2) FTP coders in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted image. Los codificadores (1) HTTP y (2) FTP en ImageMagick en versiones anteriores a 6.9.3-10 y 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.1-1 permiten a atacantes remotos llevar a cabo ataques de falsificación de peticiones del lado del servidor (SSRF) a través de una imagen manipulada. A server-side request forgery flaw was discovered in the way ImageMagick processed certain images. A remote attacker could exploit this flaw to mislead an application using ImageMagick or an unsuspecting user using the ImageMagick utilities into, for example, performing HTTP(S) requests or opening FTP sessions via specially crafted images. ImageMagick contains an unspecified vulnerability that allows attackers to perform server-side request forgery (SSRF) via a crafted image. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39767 http://git.imagemagick.org/repos/ImageMagick/blob/a01518e08c840577cabd7d3ff291a9ba735f7276/ChangeLog http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00025.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00028.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00051.html http&# • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 81%CPEs: 84EXPL: 2CVE-2016-3715 – ImageMagick Arbitrary File Deletion Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3715
The EPHEMERAL coder in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allows remote attackers to delete arbitrary files via a crafted image. El codificador EPHEMERAL en ImageMagick en versiones anteriores a 6.9.3-10 y 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.1-1 permite a atacantes remotos eliminar archivos arbitrarios a través de una imagen manipulada. It was discovered that certain ImageMagick coders and pseudo-protocols did not properly prevent security sensitive operations when processing specially crafted images. A remote attacker could create a specially crafted image that, when processed by an application using ImageMagick or an unsuspecting user using the ImageMagick utilities, would allow the attacker to delete arbitrary files. ImageMagick contains an unspecified vulnerability that could allow users to delete files by using ImageMagick's 'ephemeral' pseudo protocol, which deletes files after reading. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39767 http://git.imagemagick.org/repos/ImageMagick/blob/a01518e08c840577cabd7d3ff291a9ba735f7276/ChangeLog http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00025.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00028.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00051.html http&# • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 125EXPL: 0CVE-2016-2518 – ntp: out-of-bounds references on crafted packet
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2518
The MATCH_ASSOC function in NTP before version 4.2.8p9 and 4.3.x before 4.3.92 allows remote attackers to cause an out-of-bounds reference via an addpeer request with a large hmode value. La función MATCH_ASSOC en NTP en versiones anteriores 4.2.8p9 y 4.3.x en versiones anteriores a 4.3.92 permite a atacantes remotos provocar una referencia fuera de los límites a través de una solicitud addpeer con un valor hmode grande. An out-of-bounds access flaw was found in the way ntpd processed certain packets. An authenticated attacker could use a crafted packet to create a peer association with hmode of 7 and larger, which could potentially (although highly unlikely) cause ntpd to crash. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/183647.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/184669.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00034.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00037.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00052.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-06/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016& • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 21%CPEs: 146EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4054 – squid: multiple issues in ESI processing
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4054
Buffer overflow in Squid 3.x before 3.5.17 and 4.x before 4.0.9 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted Edge Side Includes (ESI) responses. Desbordamiento de buffer en Squid 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.17 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.9 permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de respuestas Edge Side Includes (ESI) manipuladas. Buffer overflow and input validation flaws were found in the way Squid processed ESI responses. If Squid was used as a reverse proxy, or for TLS/HTTPS interception, a remote attacker able to control ESI components on an HTTP server could use these flaws to crash Squid, disclose parts of the stack memory, or possibly execute arbitrary code as the user running Squid. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/6 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/9 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinapr2016-2952096.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bi • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •