CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 19EXPL: 2CVE-2018-3760 – rubygem-sprockets: Path traversal in forbidden_request?() can allow remote attackers to read arbitrary files
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-3760
There is an information leak vulnerability in Sprockets. Versions Affected: 4.0.0.beta7 and lower, 3.7.1 and lower, 2.12.4 and lower. Specially crafted requests can be used to access files that exists on the filesystem that is outside an application's root directory, when the Sprockets server is used in production. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the work arounds immediately. Existe una vulnerabilidad de fuga de información en Sprockets. • https://github.com/mpgn/CVE-2018-3760 https://github.com/cyberharsh/Ruby-On-Rails-Path-Traversal-Vulnerability-CVE-2018-3760- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2244 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2245 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2561 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2745 https://github.com/rails/sprockets/commit/c09131cf5b2c479263939c8582e22b98ed616c5fhttps://github.com/rails/sprockets/commit/9c34fa05900b968d74f08ccf40917848a7be9441https://github.com/rails/sproc • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 481EXPL: 0CVE-2018-3665 – Kernel: FPU state information leakage via lazy FPU restore
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-3665
System software utilizing Lazy FP state restore technique on systems using Intel Core-based microprocessors may potentially allow a local process to infer data from another process through a speculative execution side channel. El software de sistema que emplea la técnica de restauración de estado Lazy FP en los sistemas que emplean microprocesadores de Intel Core podrían permitir que un proceso local infiera datos de otro proceso mediante un canal lateral de ejecución especulativa. A Floating Point Unit (FPU) state information leakage flaw was found in the way the Linux kernel saved and restored the FPU state during task switch. Linux kernels that follow the "Lazy FPU Restore" scheme are vulnerable to the FPU state information leakage issue. An unprivileged local attacker could use this flaw to read FPU state bits by conducting targeted cache side-channel attacks, similar to the Meltdown vulnerability disclosed earlier this year. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104460 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041124 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041125 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1852 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1944 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2164 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2165 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1170 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1190 https://help.ecostruxureit.com/display/public/UADCE725/Security+fixes& • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 665EXPL: 5CVE-2018-3639 – AMD / ARM / Intel - Speculative Execution Variant 4 Speculative Store Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-3639
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. Los sistemas con microprocesadores que emplean la ejecución especulativa y que realizan la ejecución especulativa de lecturas de memoria antes de que se conozcan las direcciones de todas las anteriores escrituras de memoria podrían permitir la divulgación no autorizada de información a un atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un análisis de canal lateral. Esto también se conoce como Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of Load & Store instructions (a commonly used performance optimization). It relies on the presence of a precisely-defined instruction sequence in the privileged code as well as the fact that memory read from address to which a recent memory write has occurred may see an older value and subsequently cause an update into the microprocessor's data cache even for speculatively executed instructions that never actually commit (retire). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44695 https://github.com/mmxsrup/CVE-2018-3639 https://github.com/Shuiliusheng/CVE-2018-3639-specter-v4- https://github.com/malindarathnayake/Intel-CVE-2018-3639-Mitigation_RegistryUpdate http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00007.html http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/LEN-2213 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •
CVSS: 7.9EPSS: 97%CPEs: 22EXPL: 4CVE-2018-1111 – DynoRoot DHCP Client - Command Injection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1111
DHCP packages in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and 7, Fedora 28, and earlier are vulnerable to a command injection flaw in the NetworkManager integration script included in the DHCP client. A malicious DHCP server, or an attacker on the local network able to spoof DHCP responses, could use this flaw to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on systems using NetworkManager and configured to obtain network configuration using the DHCP protocol. Los paquetes DHCP en Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 y 7, Fedora 28 y anteriores son vulnerables a un error de inyección de comandos en el script de integración NetworkManager incluido en el cliente DHCP. Un servidor DHCP malicioso o un atacante en la red ocal capaz de suplantar respuestas DHCP podría emplear este error para ejecutar comandos arbitrarios con privilegios root en sistemas que emplean NetworkManager y se configuran para obtener la configuración de red mediante el protocolo de configuración dinámica de host (DHCP). A command injection flaw was found in the NetworkManager integration script included in the DHCP client packages in Red Hat Enterprise Linux. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44652 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44890 https://github.com/kkirsche/CVE-2018-1111 https://github.com/knqyf263/CVE-2018-1111 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104195 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040912 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1453 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1454 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1455 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1456 https://access.redhat.com&#x • CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') •
CVSS: 8.6EPSS: 5%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2018-10184 – haproxy: Heap buffer overflow in mux_h2.c:h2_process_demux() can allow attackers to cause a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-10184
An issue was discovered in HAProxy before 1.8.8. The incoming H2 frame length was checked against the max_frame_size setting instead of being checked against the bufsize. The max_frame_size only applies to outgoing traffic and not to incoming, so if a large enough frame size is advertised in the SETTINGS frame, a wrapped frame will be defragmented into a temporary allocated buffer where the second fragment may overflow the heap by up to 16 kB. It is very unlikely that this can be exploited for code execution given that buffers are very short lived and their addresses not realistically predictable in production, but the likelihood of an immediate crash is absolutely certain. Se ha descubierto un problema en versiones anteriores a la 1.8.8 de HAProxy. • http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy-1.8.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=cd117685f0cff4f2f5577ef6a21eaae96ebd9f28 http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=3f0e1ec70173593f4c2b3681b26c04a4ed5fc588 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1372 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-10184 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1569297 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow •