CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 4%CPEs: 144EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4052 – squid: multiple issues in ESI processing
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4052
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Squid 3.x before 3.5.17 and 4.x before 4.0.9 allow remote HTTP servers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via crafted Edge Side Includes (ESI) responses. Múltiples desbordamientos de buffer basado en pila en Squid 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.17 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.9 permiten a servidores HTTP remotos provocar una denegación de servicio o ejecutar código arbitrario a través de respuestas Edge Side Includes (ESI) manipuladas. Buffer overflow and input validation flaws were found in the way Squid processed ESI responses. If Squid was used as a reverse proxy, or for TLS/HTTPS interception, a remote attacker able to control ESI components on an HTTP server could use these flaws to crash Squid, disclose parts of the stack memory, or possibly execute arbitrary code as the user running Squid. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/6 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/9 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2016-2881720.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/t • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 21%CPEs: 146EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4054 – squid: multiple issues in ESI processing
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4054
Buffer overflow in Squid 3.x before 3.5.17 and 4.x before 4.0.9 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted Edge Side Includes (ESI) responses. Desbordamiento de buffer en Squid 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.17 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.9 permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de respuestas Edge Side Includes (ESI) manipuladas. Buffer overflow and input validation flaws were found in the way Squid processed ESI responses. If Squid was used as a reverse proxy, or for TLS/HTTPS interception, a remote attacker able to control ESI components on an HTTP server could use these flaws to crash Squid, disclose parts of the stack memory, or possibly execute arbitrary code as the user running Squid. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/6 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/9 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinapr2016-2952096.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bi • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 154EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4051 – squid: buffer overflow in cachemgr.cgi
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4051
Buffer overflow in cachemgr.cgi in Squid 2.x, 3.x before 3.5.17, and 4.x before 4.0.9 might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code by seeding manager reports with crafted data. Desbordamiento de buffer en cachemgr.cgi en Squid 2.x, 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.17 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.9 podría permitir a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio o ejecutar código arbitrario sembrando informes manager con datos manipulados. A buffer overflow flaw was found in the way the Squid cachemgr.cgi utility processed remotely relayed Squid input. When the CGI interface utility is used, a remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to execute arbitrary code. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/6 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/9 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2016-2881720.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/t • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 71%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2016-2390
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2390
The FwdState::connectedToPeer method in FwdState.cc in Squid before 3.5.14 and 4.0.x before 4.0.6 does not properly handle SSL handshake errors when built with the --with-openssl option, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a plaintext HTTP message. El método FwdState::connectedToPeer en FwdState.cc en Squid en versiones anteriores a 3.5.14 y 4.0.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.6 no maneja correctamente los errores de apretones de manos SSL cuando se construye con la opción --with-openssl, lo que permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (caída de aplicación) a través de un mensaje HTTP en texto plano. • http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4437 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-announce/2016-February/000037.html http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-announce/2016-February/000038.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035045 http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2016_1.txt • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 6%CPEs: 158EXPL: 0CVE-2016-3948 – squid: denial of service issue in HTTP response processing
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3948
Squid 3.x before 3.5.16 and 4.x before 4.0.8 improperly perform bounds checking, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HTTP response, related to Vary headers. Squid 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.16 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.8 no realiza adecuadamente la comprobación de límites, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio a través de una respuesta HTTP manipulada, relacionada con cabeceras Vary. An incorrect boundary check was found in the way squid handled the Vary header in HTTP responses, which could lead to an assertion failure. A malicious HTTP server could use this flaw to crash squid using a specially crafted HTTP response. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2600.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035458 http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2016_4.txt http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.5/changesets/squid-3.5-14016.patch https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201607-01 ht • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •