CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 13EXPL: 3CVE-2016-8654 – jasper: heap-based buffer overflow in QMFB code in JPC codec
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-8654
A heap-buffer overflow vulnerability was found in QMFB code in JPC codec caused by buffer being allocated with too small size. jasper versions before 2.0.0 are affected. Se ha descubierto una vulnerabilidad de desbordamiento de búfer basado en memoria dinámica (heap) en el código QMFB en el codec JPC provocado porque el búfer se asigna con un tamaño demasiado pequeño. Se ha visto afectado jaster en versiones anteriores a la 2.0.0. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94583 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1208 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-8654 https://github.com/mdadams/jasper/commit/4a59cfaf9ab3d48fca4a15c0d2674bf7138e3d1a https://github.com/mdadams/jasper/issues/93 https://github.com/mdadams/jasper/issues/94 https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3785 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-8654 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399167 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 1CVE-2016-9583 – jasper: integer overflows leading to out of bounds read in packet iterators in JPC decoder
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-9583
An out-of-bounds heap read vulnerability was found in the jpc_pi_nextpcrl() function of jasper before 2.0.6 when processing crafted input. Se ha detectado una vulnerabilidad de lectura de memoria dinámica (heap) fuera de límites en la función jpc_pi_nextpcrl() de jasper en versiones anteriores a la 2.0.6 al procesar entradas manipuladas. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94925 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1208 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-9583 https://github.com/mdadams/jasper/commit/aa0b0f79ade5eef8b0e7a214c03f5af54b36ba7d https://github.com/mdadams/jasper/commit/f25486c3d4aa472fec79150f2c41ed4333395d3d https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2019-5072801.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9583 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405148 • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •
CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 1CVE-2017-5466 – Mozilla: Origin confusion when reloading isolated data:text/html URL (MFSA 2017-12)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-5466
If a page is loaded from an original site through a hyperlink and contains a redirect to a "data:text/html" URL, triggering a reload will run the reloaded "data:text/html" page with its origin set incorrectly. This allows for a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 52.1, Firefox ESR < 52.1, and Firefox < 53. Si se carga una página desde un sitio original mediante un hipervínculo y contiene una redirección a una URL "data:text/html", desencadenar una recarga ejecutará la página "data:text/html" recargada con su origen establecido incorrectamente. Esto permite un ataque de Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97940 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038320 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1106 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1201 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1353975 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2017-10 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2017-12 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2017-13 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-5466 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2017-3139 – bind: assertion failure in DNSSEC validation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-3139
A denial of service flaw was found in the way BIND handled DNSSEC validation. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make named exit unexpectedly with an assertion failure via a specially crafted DNS response. Se encontró un fallo de denegación de servicio en la forma en que BIND maneja la comprobación de DNSSEC. Un atacante remoto podría utilizar este fallo para hacer la salida nombrada inesperadamente con un error de aserción por medio de una respuesta DNS especialmente creada. • https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2017-3139 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447743 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-3139 • CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 52%CPEs: 20EXPL: 2CVE-2017-8291 – Artifex Ghostscript Type Confusion Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-8291
Artifex Ghostscript through 2017-04-26 allows -dSAFER bypass and remote command execution via .rsdparams type confusion with a "/OutputFile (%pipe%" substring in a crafted .eps document that is an input to the gs program, as exploited in the wild in April 2017. Artifex Ghostscript permite sobrepasar -dSAFER y la ejecución de comandos remotos a través de una vulnerabilidad de type confusion en .rsdparams con una subcadena "/ OutputFile (% pipe%" en un documento .eps que se utilice como entrada al gs. It was found that ghostscript did not properly validate the parameters passed to the .rsdparams and .eqproc functions. During its execution, a specially crafted PostScript document could execute code in the context of the ghostscript process, bypassing the -dSAFER protection. Artifex Ghostscript allows -dSAFER bypass and remote command execution via .rsdparams type confusion with a "/OutputFile. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/41955 http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/04/28/2 http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3838 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98476 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1230 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697808 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446063 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036453 https://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=04b37bbce174eed24edec7ad5b920eb93db4d47d • CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') •