CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 153EXPL: 0CVE-2013-0793 – Mozilla: Cross-site scripting (XSS) using timed history navigations (MFSA 2013-38)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-0793
Mozilla Firefox before 20.0, Firefox ESR 17.x before 17.0.5, Thunderbird before 17.0.5, Thunderbird ESR 17.x before 17.0.5, and SeaMonkey before 2.17 do not ensure the correctness of the address bar during history navigation, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks or phishing attacks by leveraging control over navigation timing. Mozilla Firefox antes de 20.0, Firefox ESR v17.x antes v17.0.5, Thunderbird antes de 17.0.5, Thunderbird ESR v17.x antes de v17.0.5 y SeaMonkey antes de v2.17 no garantizan la exactitud de la barra de direcciones en el historial de navegación, que permite atacantes remotos para realizar cross-site scripting (XSS) o ataques de phishing, aprovechando el control sobre el tiempo de navegación. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-04/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-04/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-04/msg00013.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-05/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-06/msg00012.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0696.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0697.html http://www.debian.org/security&#x • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •
CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 23EXPL: 0CVE-2013-0800 – Mozilla: Out-of-bounds write in Cairo library (MFSA 2013-31)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-0800
Integer signedness error in the pixman_fill_sse2 function in pixman-sse2.c in Pixman, as distributed with Cairo and used in Mozilla Firefox before 20.0, Firefox ESR 17.x before 17.0.5, Thunderbird before 17.0.5, Thunderbird ESR 17.x before 17.0.5, SeaMonkey before 2.17, and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted values that trigger attempted use of a (1) negative box boundary or (2) negative box size, leading to an out-of-bounds write operation. Error de signo de entero en la función pixman_fill_sse2 en pixman-sse2.c en Pixman, distribuido con Cairo y utiliza Mozilla Firefox antes de v20.0, Firefox ESR v17.x antes v17.0.5, Thunderbird antes de v17.0.5, Thunderbird ESR v17.x antes v17.0.5, SeaMonkey antes de v2.17, y otros productos, permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de los valores manipulados que desencadenan intento de uso de un límite de caja (1) negativo o (2) tamaño de caja negativo, lo que lleva a una operación de escritura fuera de rango. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-04/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-04/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-04/msg00013.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-05/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-06/msg00012.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0696.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0697.html http://www.debian.org/security&#x • CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 153EXPL: 0CVE-2013-0795 – Mozilla: Bypass of SOW protections allows cloning of protected nodes (MFSA 2013-36)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-0795
The System Only Wrapper (SOW) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 20.0, Firefox ESR 17.x before 17.0.5, Thunderbird before 17.0.5, Thunderbird ESR 17.x before 17.0.5, and SeaMonkey before 2.17 does not prevent use of the cloneNode method for cloning a protected node, which allows remote attackers to bypass the Same Origin Policy or possibly execute arbitrary JavaScript code with chrome privileges via a crafted web site. El System Only Wrapper (SOW) implementado en la aplicación Mozilla Firefox antes de v20.0, Firefox ESR v17.x antes v17.0.5, Thunderbird anterior a v17.0.5, Thunderbird ESR v17.x antes v17.0.5 y SeaMonkey antes de v2.17 no evita el uso del método cloneNode para clonar un nodo protegido, que permite a atacantes remotos evitar la política del mismo origen o posiblemente ejecutar código JavaScript arbitrario con privilegios de cromo a través de un sitio web manipulado. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-04/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-04/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-04/msg00013.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-05/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-06/msg00012.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0696.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0697.html http://www.debian.org/security&#x • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 34EXPL: 0CVE-2013-2566
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-2566
The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, has many single-byte biases, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of ciphertext in a large number of sessions that use the same plaintext. El algoritmo RC4, tal como se usa en el protocolo TLS y protocolo SSL, tiene muchos "single-byte biases", lo que hace que sea más fácil para atacantes remotos realizar ataques de recuperación de texto claro a través de análisis estadístico de texto cifrado en un gran número de sesiones que utilizan el mismo texto claro. • http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2013/03/attack-of-week-rc4-is-kind-of-broken-in.html http://cr.yp.to/talks/2013.03.12/slides.pdf http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10705 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143039468003789&w=2 http://my.opera.com/securitygroup/blog/2013/03/20/on-the-precariousness-of-rc4 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201406-19.xml http://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/tls http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2013/mfsa2013& • CWE-326: Inadequate Encryption Strength •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2011-3079
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2011-3079
The Inter-process Communication (IPC) implementation in Google Chrome before 18.0.1025.168, as used in Mozilla Firefox before 38.0 and other products, does not properly validate messages, which has unspecified impact and attack vectors. La implementación de Inter-process Communication (IPC) en Google Chrome en versiones anteriores a 18.0.1025.168, tal como se utiliza en Mozilla Firefox en versiones anteriores a 38.0 y otros productos, no valida mensajes adecuadamente, lo que tiene un impacto y vectores de ataque no especificados. • http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=117627 http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2012/04/stable-channel-update_30.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-05/msg00012.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-05/msg00036.html http://osvdb.org/81645 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1012.html http://secunia.com/advisories/48992 http://www.debian.org/securi • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors •