Page 139 of 1072 results (0.011 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0

Stack-based buffer overflow in the nss_dns implementation of the getnetbyname function in GNU C Library (aka glibc) before 2.24 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (stack consumption and application crash) via a long name. Desbordamiento de buffer basado en pila en la implementación nss_dns de la función getnetbyname en GNU C Library (también conocido como glibc) en versiones anteriores a 2.24 permite a atacantes dependientes del contexto provocar una denegación de servicio (consumo de pila y caída de aplicación) a través de un nombre largo. A stack overflow vulnerability was found in _nss_dns_getnetbyname_r. On systems with nsswitch configured to include "networks: dns" with a privileged or network-facing service that would attempt to resolve user-provided network names, an attacker could provide an excessively long network name, resulting in stack corruption and code execution. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/184626.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-06/msg00030.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-07/msg00039.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2573.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/85732 http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2985-1 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201702-11 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19879 https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc. • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 5%CPEs: 23EXPL: 0

Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.23 allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a long argument to the (1) nan, (2) nanf, or (3) nanl function. Múltiples desbordamientos de buffer basado en pila en la GNU C Library (también conocida como glibc o libc6) en versiones anteriores a 2.23 permiten a atacantes dependientes del contexto causar una denegación de servicio (caída de aplicación) o posiblemente ejecutar código arbirario a través de un argumento largo en la función (1) nan, (2) nanf o (3) nanl. A stack overflow vulnerability was found in nan* functions that could cause applications, which process long strings with the nan function, to crash or, potentially, execute arbitrary code. Many Cisco devices such as Cisco RV340, Cisco RV340W, Cisco RV345, Cisco RV345P, Cisco RV260, Cisco RV260P, Cisco RV260W, Cisco 160, and Cisco 160W suffer from having hard-coded credentials, known GNU glibc, known BusyBox, and IoT Inspector identified vulnerabilities. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/184626.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00036.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00037.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00038.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00039.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00042.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153278/WAGO-852-Industria • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 3%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0

Integer overflow in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.23 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via the size argument to the __hcreate_r function, which triggers out-of-bounds heap-memory access. Desbordamiento de entero en la GNU C Library (también conocida como glibc o libc6) en versiones anteriores a 2.23 permite a atacantes dependientes del contexto causar una denegación de servicio (caída de aplicación) o posiblemente ejecutar código arbitrario a través del argumento size a la función the __hcreate_r, lo que desencandena el acceso fuera de rango a memoria dinámica. An integer overflow vulnerability was found in hcreate() and hcreate_r() functions which could result in an out-of-bounds memory access. This could lead to application crash or, potentially, arbitrary code execution. Many Cisco devices such as Cisco RV340, Cisco RV340W, Cisco RV345, Cisco RV345P, Cisco RV260, Cisco RV260P, Cisco RV260W, Cisco 160, and Cisco 160W suffer from having hard-coded credentials, known GNU glibc, known BusyBox, and IoT Inspector identified vulnerabilities. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/184626.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00036.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00037.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00038.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00039.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00042.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154361/Cisco-Device-Hardc • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •

CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0

The strftime function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.23 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly obtain sensitive information via an out-of-range time value. La función strftime en la GNU C Library (también conocida como glibc o libc6) en versiones anteriores a 2.23 permite a atacantes dependientes del contexto causar una denegación de servicio (caída de aplicación) o posiblemente obtener información sensible a través de un valor de tiempo fuera de rango. It was found that out-of-range time values passed to the strftime() function could result in an out-of-bounds memory access. This could lead to application crash or, potentially, information disclosure. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/184626.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00036.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00037.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00038.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00039.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00042.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0680.html http&# • CWE-189: Numeric Errors •

CVSS: 7.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 1

The process_envvars function in elf/rtld.c in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.23 allows local users to bypass a pointer-guarding protection mechanism via a zero value of the LD_POINTER_GUARD environment variable. La función process_envvars en elf/rtld.c en la GNU C Library (también conocida como glibc o libc6) en versiones anteriores a 2.23 permite a usuarios locales eludir un mecanismo de protección de puntero a través de un valor cero de la variable de entorno LD_POINTER_GUARD. It was found that the dynamic loader did not sanitize the LD_POINTER_GUARD environment variable. An attacker could use this flaw to bypass the pointer guarding protection on set-user-ID or set-group-ID programs to execute arbitrary code with the permissions of the user running the application. • http://hmarco.org/bugs/glibc_ptr_mangle_weakness.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-February/177404.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00036.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00037.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00038.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00039.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3480 http://www.openwall& • CWE-254: 7PK - Security Features •