Page 14 of 296 results (0.027 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0

In Apache HTTP Server 2.4 release 2.4.37 and prior, mod_session checks the session expiry time before decoding the session. This causes session expiry time to be ignored for mod_session_cookie sessions since the expiry time is loaded when the session is decoded. En Apache HTTP Server 2.4, en sus distribuciones 2.4.37 y anteriores, mod_session comprueba el tiempo de caducidad de la sesión antes de descodificarla. Esto provoca que se ignore el tiempo de caducidad de la sesión para sesiones mod_session_cookie, debido a que el tiempo de caducidad se carga cuando la sesión está descodificada. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106742 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3932 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3933 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3935 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4126 https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/56c2e7cc9deb1c12a843d0dc251ea7fd3e7e80293cde02fcd65286ba%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/84a3714f0878781f6ed84473d1a503d2cc382277e100450209231830%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache • CWE-384: Session Fixation CWE-613: Insufficient Session Expiration •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0

A bug exists in the way mod_ssl handled client renegotiations. A remote attacker could send a carefully crafted request that would cause mod_ssl to enter a loop leading to a denial of service. This bug can be only triggered with Apache HTTP Server version 2.4.37 when using OpenSSL version 1.1.1 or later, due to an interaction in changes to handling of renegotiation attempts. Existe un problema en la manera en la que mod_ssl gestionaba registros de cliente. Un atacante remoto podría enviar una petición especialmente manipulada que conduciría a que mod_ssl entre en un bucle, provocando una denegación de servicio (DoS). • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106743 https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/56c2e7cc9deb1c12a843d0dc251ea7fd3e7e80293cde02fcd65286ba%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/84a3714f0878781f6ed84473d1a503d2cc382277e100450209231830%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r03ee478b3dda3e381fd6189366fa7af97c980d2f602846eef935277d%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r06f0d87ebb6d59ed8379633f36f72f5b1f79cadfda72ede0830b42cf%40%3Ccvs.httpd •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0

In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.17 to 2.4.34, by sending continuous, large SETTINGS frames a client can occupy a connection, server thread and CPU time without any connection timeout coming to effect. This affects only HTTP/2 connections. A possible mitigation is to not enable the h2 protocol. En Apache HTTP Server, de la versión 2.4.17 a la 2.4.34, mediante el envío continuo de tramas SETTINGS grandes, un cliente puede ocupar una conexión, hilo del servidor y tiempo de CPU sin que se active ningún agotamiento del tiempo de conexión. Esto solo afecta a las conexiones HTTP/2. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00030.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00056.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105414 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041713 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3558 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0366 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0367 https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/56c2e7cc9deb1c12a843d0dc251ea7f • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 41EXPL: 0

Possible CRLF injection allowing HTTP response splitting attacks for sites which use mod_userdir. This issue was mitigated by changes made in 2.4.25 and 2.2.32 which prohibit CR or LF injection into the "Location" or other outbound header key or value. Fixed in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.25 (Affected 2.4.1-2.4.23). Fixed in Apache HTTP Server 2.2.32 (Affected 2.2.0-2.2.31). Posible inyección CRLF que permite ataques de separación de respuesta HTTP para los sitios que emplean mod_userdir. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105093 https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_22.html#CVE-2016-4975 https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html#CVE-2016-4975 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/56c2e7cc9deb1c12a843d0dc251ea7fd3e7e80293cde02fcd65286ba%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/84a3714f0878781f6ed84473d1a503d2cc382277e100450209231830%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8d63cb8e9100f28a99429b4328e4e7cebce861d5772ac9863ba2ae6f%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https&# • CWE-93: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection') CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 94%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

By specially crafting HTTP requests, the mod_md challenge handler would dereference a NULL pointer and cause the child process to segfault. This could be used to DoS the server. Fixed in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.34 (Affected 2.4.33). Manipulando especialmente peticiones HTTP, el manipulador challenge mod_md desreferencia un puntero NULL y hace que el proceso hijo entre en segfault. Esto podría emplearse para provocar una denegación de servicio (DoS) en el servidor. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041401 https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html#CVE-2018-8011 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/56c2e7cc9deb1c12a843d0dc251ea7fd3e7e80293cde02fcd65286ba%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/84a3714f0878781f6ed84473d1a503d2cc382277e100450209231830%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r03ee478b3dda3e381fd6189366fa7af97c980d2f602846eef935277d%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r06f0d87ebb6d59ed8379633f36f72f5b1f79cadfda72ede0830b42cf&# • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •