CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 10%CPEs: 64EXPL: 0CVE-2011-4577 – openssl: malformed RFC 3779 data can cause assertion failures
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2011-4577
OpenSSL before 0.9.8s and 1.x before 1.0.0f, when RFC 3779 support is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure) via an X.509 certificate containing certificate-extension data associated with (1) IP address blocks or (2) Autonomous System (AS) identifiers. OpenSSL antes de v0.9.8s y v1.x antes de v1.0.0f, cuando el soporte al RFC 3779 está habilitado, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (error de aserción) a través de un certificado X.509 que contiene la extensión de certificados de datos asociados con identificados de (1) bloques de direcciones IP o (2) Sistema Autónomo (AS). • http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c03360041 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2013/Jun/msg00000.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-November/092905.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-01/msg00017.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-01/msg00018.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=132750648501816&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=134039053214295&w=2 http://s • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 18%CPEs: 64EXPL: 0CVE-2011-4619 – openssl: SGC restart DoS attack
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2011-4619
The Server Gated Cryptography (SGC) implementation in OpenSSL before 0.9.8s and 1.x before 1.0.0f does not properly handle handshake restarts, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via unspecified vectors. La implementación del servidor de criptografía SGC en OpenSSL antes de v0.9.8s y en v1.x antes de v1.0.0f no controla correctamente los reinicios de 'handshake' (apretón de manos), lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio a través de vectores no especificados. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory3.asc http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c03360041 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2013/Jun/msg00000.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-November/092905.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-01/msg00017.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-01/msg00018.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=132750648501816&w=2 • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 64EXPL: 0CVE-2011-4108 – openssl: DTLS plaintext recovery attack
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2011-4108
The DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 0.9.8s and 1.x before 1.0.0f performs a MAC check only if certain padding is valid, which makes it easier for remote attackers to recover plaintext via a padding oracle attack. La implementación DTLS en OpenSSL antes de v0.9.8s y v1.x antes de v1.0.0f realiza una comprobación de MAC sólo si determinado relleno es válida, lo que facilita a los atacantes remotos a la hora de recuperar texto a través de un ataque de relleno. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory3.asc http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c03360041 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2013/Jun/msg00000.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-November/092905.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-01/msg00017.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-01/msg00018.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/201 • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 30%CPEs: 30EXPL: 0CVE-2011-3210
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2011-3210
The ephemeral ECDH ciphersuite functionality in OpenSSL 0.9.8 through 0.9.8r and 1.0.x before 1.0.0e does not ensure thread safety during processing of handshake messages from clients, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via out-of-order messages that violate the TLS protocol. La efímera funcionalidad de cifrado ECDH en OpenSSL versiones v0.9.8 a v0.9.8s y v1.0.x antes de v1.0.0e no garantiza la seguridad de los subprocesos durante el procesamiento de los mensajes de 'handshake', lo que permite provocar una denegación de servicio (por caída de la aplicación) a atacantes remotos a través de mensajes 'desordenados' que violan el protocolo TLS. • http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=21337 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2013/Jun/msg00000.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=132750648501816&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=133226187115472&w=2 http://openssl.org/news/secadv_20110906.txt http://secunia.com/advisories/57353 http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5784 http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=ssg1S1004564 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories? • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0CVE-2011-3207 – openssl: CRL verification vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2011-3207
crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c in OpenSSL 1.0.x before 1.0.0e does not initialize certain structure members, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass CRL validation by using a nextUpdate value corresponding to a time in the past. crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c en OpenSSL v1.0.x antes de v1.0.0e no inicializa algunos miembros de una estructura, lo que facilita a los atacantes remotos a la hora de evitar la validación de la CRL utilizando un valor nextUpdate que corresponde a un momento en el pasado. • http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=21349 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2013/Jun/msg00000.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-September/065712.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-September/065744.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-November/092905.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=133226187115472&w=2 http://openssl.org/news/secadv_20110906.txt http://secunia.com/advisories/45956 http • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •