CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0CVE-2021-28041
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-28041
ssh-agent in OpenSSH before 8.5 has a double free that may be relevant in a few less-common scenarios, such as unconstrained agent-socket access on a legacy operating system, or the forwarding of an agent to an attacker-controlled host. ssh-agent en OpenSSH versiones anteriores a 8.5, presenta una doble liberación que puede ser relevante en algunos escenarios menos comunes, como el acceso sin restricciones al socket del agente en un sistema operativo heredado o el reenvío de un agente a un host controlado por el atacante • https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/commit/e04fd6dde16de1cdc5a4d9946397ff60d96568db https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KQWGII3LQR4AOTPPFXGMTYE7UDEWIUKI https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TXST2CML2MWY3PNVUXX7FFJE3ATJMNVZ https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202105-35 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210416-0002 https://www.openssh.com/security.html https://www.openssh.com/txt/release-8.5 https://www • CWE-415: Double Free •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 38EXPL: 0CVE-2021-23841 – Null pointer deref in X509_issuer_and_serial_hash()
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-23841
The OpenSSL public API function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() attempts to create a unique hash value based on the issuer and serial number data contained within an X509 certificate. However it fails to correctly handle any errors that may occur while parsing the issuer field (which might occur if the issuer field is maliciously constructed). This may subsequently result in a NULL pointer deref and a crash leading to a potential denial of service attack. The function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() is never directly called by OpenSSL itself so applications are only vulnerable if they use this function directly and they use it on certificates that may have been obtained from untrusted sources. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1i and below are affected by this issue. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/May/67 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/May/68 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/May/70 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=122a19ab48091c657f7cb1fb3af9fc07bd557bbf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=8252ee4d90f3f2004d3d0aeeed003ad49c9a7807 https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44846 https://security.gentoo.org/gls • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 15EXPL: 0CVE-2021-23839 – Incorrect SSLv2 rollback protection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-23839
OpenSSL 1.0.2 supports SSLv2. If a client attempts to negotiate SSLv2 with a server that is configured to support both SSLv2 and more recent SSL and TLS versions then a check is made for a version rollback attack when unpadding an RSA signature. Clients that support SSL or TLS versions greater than SSLv2 are supposed to use a special form of padding. A server that supports greater than SSLv2 is supposed to reject connection attempts from a client where this special form of padding is present, because this indicates that a version rollback has occurred (i.e. both client and server support greater than SSLv2, and yet this is the version that is being requested). The implementation of this padding check inverted the logic so that the connection attempt is accepted if the padding is present, and rejected if it is absent. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=30919ab80a478f2d81f2e9acdcca3fa4740cd547 https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44846 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210219-0009 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006 https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210216.txt https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html&# • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 19EXPL: 1CVE-2021-23336 – Web Cache Poisoning
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-23336
The package python/cpython from 0 and before 3.6.13, from 3.7.0 and before 3.7.10, from 3.8.0 and before 3.8.8, from 3.9.0 and before 3.9.2 are vulnerable to Web Cache Poisoning via urllib.parse.parse_qsl and urllib.parse.parse_qs by using a vector called parameter cloaking. When the attacker can separate query parameters using a semicolon (;), they can cause a difference in the interpretation of the request between the proxy (running with default configuration) and the server. This can result in malicious requests being cached as completely safe ones, as the proxy would usually not see the semicolon as a separator, and therefore would not include it in a cache key of an unkeyed parameter. El paquete python/cpython desde versiones 0 y anteriores a 3.6.13, desde versiones 3.7.0 y anteriores a 3.7.10, desde versiones 3.8.0 y anteriores a 3.8.8, desde versiones 3.9.0 y anteriores a 3.9.2, son vulnerables al envenenamiento de caché web por medio de urllib.parse.parse_qsl y urllib.parse.parse_qs usando un vector llamado encubrimiento de parámetros. Cuando el atacante puede separar los parámetros de la consulta usando un punto y coma (;), pueden causar una diferencia en la interpretación de la petición entre el proxy (que se ejecuta con la configuración predeterminada) y el servidor. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/02/19/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/05/01/2 https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24297 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra8ce70088ba291f358e077cafdb14d174b7a1ce9a9d86d1b332d6367%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc005f4de9d9b0ba943ceb8ff5a21a5c6ff8a9df52632476698d99432%40%3Cannounce.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772%40%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E https:/&#x • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2021-20227
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-20227
A flaw was found in SQLite's SELECT query functionality (src/select.c). This flaw allows an attacker who is capable of running SQL queries locally on the SQLite database to cause a denial of service or possible code execution by triggering a use-after-free. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. Se encontró un fallo en la funcionalidad de consulta SELECT de SQLite (src/select.c). Este fallo permite a un atacante que es capaz de ejecutar consultas SQL localmente en la base de datos SQLite causar una denegación de servicio o una posible ejecución de código desencadenando un uso de la memoria previamente liberada. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924886 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202103-04 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-40 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210423-0010 https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html https://www.sqlite.org/releaselog/3_34_1.html • CWE-416: Use After Free •