CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2018-10907 – glusterfs: Stack-based buffer overflow in server-rpc-fops.c allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-10907
It was found that glusterfs server is vulnerable to multiple stack based buffer overflows due to functions in server-rpc-fopc.c allocating fixed size buffers using 'alloca(3)'. An authenticated attacker could exploit this by mounting a gluster volume and sending a string longer that the fixed buffer size to cause crash or potential code execution. Se ha detectado que el servidor glusterfs es vulnerable a múltiples desbordamientos de búfer basados en pila debido a que las funciones en server-rpc-fopc.c asignan búfers de tamaño fijo mediante "alloca(3)". Un atacante autenticado podría explotar esto montando un volumen gluster y enviando una cadena más grande que el tamaño fijo de búfer para provocar su cierre inesperado o la potencial ejecución de código. It was found that glusterfs server is vulnerable to mulitple stack based buffer overflows due to functions in server-rpc-fopc.c allocating fixed size buffers using 'alloca(3)'. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00035.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2607 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2608 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3470 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-10907 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00021.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/11/msg00000.html https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/21070 https:/ • CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 18EXPL: 0CVE-2018-10873 – spice: Missing check in demarshal.py:write_validate_array_item() allows for buffer overflow and denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-10873
A vulnerability was discovered in SPICE before version 0.14.1 where the generated code used for demarshalling messages lacked sufficient bounds checks. A malicious client or server, after authentication, could send specially crafted messages to its peer which would result in a crash or, potentially, other impacts. Se ha descubierto una vulnerabilidad en SPICE en versiones anteriores a la 0.14.1 en la que el código generado utilizado para deserializar mensajes carecía de comprobaciones de límites suficientes. Un cliente o servidor malicioso, después de la autenticación, podría enviar mensajes especialmente manipulados a su peer, lo que resultaría en un cierre inesperado o, potencialmente, otros impactos. A vulnerability was discovered in SPICE where the generated code used for demarshalling messages lacked sufficient bounds checks. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105152 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2731 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2732 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3470 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-10873 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/spice/spice-common/commit/bb15d4815ab586b4c4a20f4a565970a44824c42c https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/08/msg00035.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/08/msg00037.html https://lists.debi • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0CVE-2018-10858 – samba: Insufficient input validation in libsmbclient
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-10858
A heap-buffer overflow was found in the way samba clients processed extra long filename in a directory listing. A malicious samba server could use this flaw to cause arbitrary code execution on a samba client. Samba versions before 4.6.16, 4.7.9 and 4.8.4 are vulnerable. Se ha descubierto un desbordamiento de búfer en la manera en la que los clientes de samba procesaban nombres de archivo excesivamente largos en un listado de directorios. Un servidor samba malicioso podría utilizar este defecto para provocar la ejecución de código arbitrario en un cliente de samba. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105085 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042002 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2612 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2613 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3056 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3470 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-10858 https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10284 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202003-52 https://security.netapp.com/advisory • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 8.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0CVE-2018-10915 – postgresql: Certain host connection parameters defeat client-side security defenses
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-10915
A vulnerability was found in libpq, the default PostgreSQL client library where libpq failed to properly reset its internal state between connections. If an affected version of libpq was used with "host" or "hostaddr" connection parameters from untrusted input, attackers could bypass client-side connection security features, obtain access to higher privileged connections or potentially cause other impact through SQL injection, by causing the PQescape() functions to malfunction. Postgresql versions before 10.5, 9.6.10, 9.5.14, 9.4.19, and 9.3.24 are affected. Se ha encontrado una vulnerabilidad en qemu-img, la biblioteca de cliente por defecto de PostgreSQL por la que libpq fracasa a la hora de restablecer su estado interno entre conexiones. Si se emplea una versión afectada de libpq se emplea con parámetros de conexión "host" o "hostaddr" desde entradas no fiables, los atacantes podrían omitir características de seguridad de conexión del lado del cliente, obtener acceso a conexiones con mayores privilegios o, posiblemente, provocar otro tipo de impacto mediante una inyección SQL. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-08/msg00043.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105054 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041446 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2511 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2557 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2565 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2566 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2643 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2721 https://access.redhat.com/errata&#x • CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-665: Improper Initialization •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 74%CPEs: 127EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5390 – Linux kernel versions 4.9+ can be forced to make very expensive calls to tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() and tcp_prune_ofo_queue() for every incoming packet which can lead to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5390
Linux kernel versions 4.9+ can be forced to make very expensive calls to tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() and tcp_prune_ofo_queue() for every incoming packet which can lead to a denial of service. El kernel de Linux en versiones 4.9 y siguientes pueden forzarse a realizar llamadas muy caras a tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() y tcp_prune_ofo_queue() para cada paquete entrante, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. A flaw named SegmentSmack was found in the way the Linux kernel handled specially crafted TCP packets. A remote attacker could use this flaw to trigger time and calculation expensive calls to tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() and tcp_prune_ofo_queue() functions by sending specially modified packets within ongoing TCP sessions which could lead to a CPU saturation and hence a denial of service on the system. Maintaining the denial of service condition requires continuous two-way TCP sessions to a reachable open port, thus the attacks cannot be performed using spoofed IP addresses. • http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2018-004.txt http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20181031-02-linux-en http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/4 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104976 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041424 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041434 https://access.redhat.co • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •