CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 75EXPL: 0CVE-2016-2113 – samba: Server certificates not validated at client side
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2113
Samba 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 does not verify X.509 certificates from TLS servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof LDAPS and HTTPS servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. Samba 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.2.11, 4.3.x en versiones anteriores a 4.3.8 y 4.4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.4.2 no verifica certificados X.509 de servidores TLS, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle suplantar servidores LDAPS y HTTPS y obtener información sensible a través de un certificado manipulado. It was found that Samba did not validate SSL/TLS certificates in certain connections. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to spoof a Samba server using a specially crafted SSL/TLS certificate. • http://badlock.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/182185.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/182272.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/182288.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-04/msg00020.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-04/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-04/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.or • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 75EXPL: 0CVE-2016-2114 – samba: Samba based active directory domain controller does not enforce smb signing
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2114
The SMB1 protocol implementation in Samba 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 does not recognize the "server signing = mandatory" setting, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SMB servers by modifying the client-server data stream. La implementación del protocolo SMB1 en Samba 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.2.11, 4.3.x en versiones anteriores a 4.3.8 y 4.4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.4.2 no reconoce el ajuste "server signing = mandatory", lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle suplantar servidores SMB modificando el flujo de datos cliente-servidor. It was discovered that Samba did not enforce Server Message Block (SMB) signing for clients using the SMB1 protocol. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to modify traffic between a client and a server. • http://badlock.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/182185.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/182272.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/182288.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-04/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-04/msg00048.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0612.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-06 • CWE-254: 7PK - Security Features CWE-300: Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 251EXPL: 0CVE-2016-2110 – samba: Man-in-the-middle attacks possible with NTLMSSP authentication
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2110
The NTLMSSP authentication implementation in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to perform protocol-downgrade attacks by modifying the client-server data stream to remove application-layer flags or encryption settings, as demonstrated by clearing the NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SEAL or NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SIGN option to disrupt LDAP security. La implementación de autenticación NTLMSSP en Samba 3.x y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.2.11, 4.3.x en versiones anteriores a 4.3.8 y 4.4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.4.2 permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle llevar a cabo ataques de degradación de protocolo modificando el flujo de datos cliente-servidor para eliminar indicadores de la capa de aplicación o ajustes de cifrado, según lo demostrado limpiando la opción NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SEAL o NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SIGN para interrumpir la seguridad LDAP. Several flaws were found in Samba's implementation of NTLMSSP authentication. An unauthenticated, man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to clear the encryption and integrity flags of a connection, causing data to be transmitted in plain text. The attacker could also force the client or server into sending data in plain text even if encryption was explicitly requested for that connection. • http://badlock.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/182185.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/182272.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/182288.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-04/msg00020.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-04/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-04/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.or • CWE-254: 7PK - Security Features CWE-300: Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint •
CVSS: 8.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 101EXPL: 0CVE-2015-5370 – samba: crash in dcesrv_auth_bind_ack due to missing error check
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-5370
Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 does not properly implement the DCE-RPC layer, which allows remote attackers to perform protocol-downgrade attacks, cause a denial of service (application crash or CPU consumption), or possibly execute arbitrary code on a client system via unspecified vectors. Samba 3.x y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.2.11, 4.3.x en versiones anteriores a 4.3.8 y 4.4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.4.2 no implementa correctamente la capa DCE-RPC, lo que permite a atacantes remotos llevar a cabo protocol-downgrade attacks, provocar una denegación de servicio (caída de aplicación o consumo de CPU), o posiblemente ejecutar código arbitrario en un sistema cliente a través de vectores no especificados. Multiple flaws were found in Samba's DCE/RPC protocol implementation. A remote, authenticated attacker could use these flaws to cause a denial of service against the Samba server (high CPU load or a crash) or, possibly, execute arbitrary code with the permissions of the user running Samba (root). This flaw could also be used to downgrade a secure DCE/RPC connection by a man-in-the-middle attacker taking control of an Active Directory (AD) object and compromising the security of a Samba Active Directory Domain Controller (DC). • http://badlock.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/182185.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/182272.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/182288.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-04/msg00020.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-04/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-04/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.or •
CVSS: 6.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 251EXPL: 0CVE-2016-2111 – samba: Spoofing vulnerability when domain controller is configured
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2111
The NETLOGON service in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2, when a domain controller is configured, allows remote attackers to spoof the computer name of a secure channel's endpoint, and obtain sensitive session information, by running a crafted application and leveraging the ability to sniff network traffic, a related issue to CVE-2015-0005. El servicio NETLOGON en Samba 3.x y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.2.11, 4.3.x en versiones anteriores a 4.3.8 y 4.4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.4.2, cuando un controlador de dominio está configurado, permite a atacantes remotos suplantar el nombre del computador de un dispositivo final de un canal seguro y obtener información sensible de sesión, ejecutando una aplicación manipulada y aprovechando la habilidad para husmear tráfico de red, un problema relacionado con CVE-2015-0005. It was discovered that Samba configured as a Domain Controller would establish a secure communication channel with a machine using a spoofed computer name. A remote attacker able to observe network traffic could use this flaw to obtain session-related information about the spoofed machine. • http://badlock.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/182185.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/182272.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/182288.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-04/msg00020.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-04/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-04/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.or • CWE-254: 7PK - Security Features CWE-290: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing •