CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 15EXPL: 1CVE-2019-11041 – heap-buffer-overflow on exif_scan_thumbnail in EXIF extension
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-11041
When PHP EXIF extension is parsing EXIF information from an image, e.g. via exif_read_data() function, in PHP versions 7.1.x below 7.1.31, 7.2.x below 7.2.21 and 7.3.x below 7.3.8 it is possible to supply it with data what will cause it to read past the allocated buffer. This may lead to information disclosure or crash. Cuando la extensión EXIF de PHP está analizando información EXIF de una imagen, p.ej. por medio de la función exif_read_data(), en PHP versiones 7.1.x anteriores a 7.1.31, versiones 7.2.x anteriores a 7.2.21 y versiones 7.3.x anteriores a 7.3.8, es posible suministrarle datos que causará que se lea más allá del búfer asignado. Esto puede conllevar a la divulgación de información o bloqueo. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00019.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Oct/15 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Oct/55 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3299 https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=78222 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/08/msg00010.html https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Oct/9 https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Sep/35 https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Sep/38 https://security.netapp • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 29EXPL: 0CVE-2019-13565
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-13565
An issue was discovered in OpenLDAP 2.x before 2.4.48. When using SASL authentication and session encryption, and relying on the SASL security layers in slapd access controls, it is possible to obtain access that would otherwise be denied via a simple bind for any identity covered in those ACLs. After the first SASL bind is completed, the sasl_ssf value is retained for all new non-SASL connections. Depending on the ACL configuration, this can affect different types of operations (searches, modifications, etc.). In other words, a successful authorization step completed by one user affects the authorization requirement for a different user. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00053.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00058.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Dec/26 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1b103833cb5bc8466e24ff0ecc5e75b45a705334ab6a444e64e840a0%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4%40%3Cissues. •
CVSS: 4.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 29EXPL: 0CVE-2019-13057
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-13057
An issue was discovered in the server in OpenLDAP before 2.4.48. When the server administrator delegates rootDN (database admin) privileges for certain databases but wants to maintain isolation (e.g., for multi-tenant deployments), slapd does not properly stop a rootDN from requesting authorization as an identity from another database during a SASL bind or with a proxyAuthz (RFC 4370) control. (It is not a common configuration to deploy a system where the server administrator and a DB administrator enjoy different levels of trust.) Se detectó un problema en el servidor en OpenLDAP anterior a versión 2.4.48. Cuando el administrador del servidor delega los privilegios de tipo rootDN (administrador de base de datos) para ciertas bases de datos, pero quiere mantener el aislamiento (por ejemplo, para implementaciones de múltiples inquilinos), slapd no detiene apropiadamente un rootDN de solicitar una autorización como una identidad de otra base de datos durante un enlace SASL o con un control proxyAuthz (RFC 4370). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00053.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00058.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Dec/26 https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10365 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/08/msg00024.html https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/23 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190822-0004 https://support.apple.com/kb/HT210788 https://usn.ubuntu.com/4 •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2019-8667
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-8667
An inconsistent user interface issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in macOS Mojave 10.14.6. The encryption status of a Time Machine backup may be incorrect. Un problema de interfaz de usuario inconsistente fue abordado con una gestión de estado mejorada. Este problema es corregido en macOS Mojave versión 10.14.6. • https://support.apple.com/HT210348 •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2019-8693
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-8693
A validation issue was addressed with improved input sanitization. This issue is fixed in macOS Mojave 10.14.6. An application may be able to read restricted memory. Un problema de comprobación fue abordado mejorando el saneamiento de la entrada. Este problema es corregido en macOS Mojave versión 10.14.6. • https://support.apple.com/HT210348 • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •