CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2022-22317
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-22317
IBM Curam Social Program Management 8.0.0 and 8.0.1 does not invalidate session after logout which could allow an authenticated user to impersonate another user on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 218281. IBM Curam Social Program Management versiones 8.0.0 y 8.0.1, no invalida la sesión tras el cierre de sesión, lo que podría permitir a un usuario autenticado hacerse pasar por otro en el sistema. IBM X-Force ID: 218281 • https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/218281 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6596049 • CWE-613: Insufficient Session Expiration •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2022-21504
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-21504
The code in UEK6 U3 was missing an appropiate file descriptor count to be missing. This resulted in a use count error that allowed a file descriptor to a socket to be closed and freed while it was still in use by another portion of the kernel. An attack with local access can operate on the socket, and cause a denial of service. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.5 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). • https://github.com/oracle/linux-uek/commit/49c68f5f892d8c2be00e0a89ff2a035422c03b59 • CWE-416: Use After Free •
CVSS: 6.7EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2022-21499 – kernel: possible to use the debugger to write zero into a location of choice
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-21499
KGDB and KDB allow read and write access to kernel memory, and thus should be restricted during lockdown. An attacker with access to a serial port could trigger the debugger so it is important that the debugger respect the lockdown mode when/if it is triggered. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.7 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). KGDB y KDB permiten el acceso de lectura y escritura a la memoria del kernel, y por lo tanto deben ser restringidos durante el bloqueo. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/168191/Kernel-Live-Patch-Security-Notice-LSN-0089-1.html https://git.kernel.org/linus/eadb2f47a3ced5c64b23b90fd2a3463f63726066 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5161 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-21499 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2084183 • CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 20EXPL: 3CVE-2022-29885 – EncryptInterceptor does not provide complete protection on insecure networks
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-29885
The documentation of Apache Tomcat 10.1.0-M1 to 10.1.0-M14, 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.20, 9.0.13 to 9.0.62 and 8.5.38 to 8.5.78 for the EncryptInterceptor incorrectly stated it enabled Tomcat clustering to run over an untrusted network. This was not correct. While the EncryptInterceptor does provide confidentiality and integrity protection, it does not protect against all risks associated with running over any untrusted network, particularly DoS risks. La documentación de Apache Tomcat versiones 10.1.0-M1 a 10.1.0-M14, 10.0.0-M1 a 10.0.20, 9.0.13 a 9.0.62 y 8.5.38 a 8.5.78, para el EncryptInterceptor indicaba incorrectamente que permitía que el clustering de Tomcat fuera ejecutado sobre una red no confiable. Esto no es correcto. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51262 https://github.com/quynhlab/CVE-2022-29885 https://github.com/iveresk/CVE-2022-29885 http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/171728/Apache-Tomcat-10.1-Denial-Of-Service.html https://lists.apache.org/thread/2b4qmhbcyqvc7dyfpjyx54c03x65vhcv https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00029.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220629-0002 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5265 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 10%CPEs: 59EXPL: 5CVE-2022-1292 – The c_rehash script allows command injection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-1292
The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). • https://github.com/alcaparra/CVE-2022-1292 https://github.com/li8u99/CVE-2022-1292 https://github.com/greek0x0/CVE-2022-1292 https://github.com/rama291041610/CVE-2022-1292 https://github.com/und3sc0n0c1d0/CVE-2022-1292 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=1ad73b4d27bd8c1b369a3cd453681d3a4f1bb9b2 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=548d3f280a6e737673f5b61fce24bb100108dfeb https://git • CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') •