CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 93%CPEs: 87EXPL: 0CVE-2011-4096 – squid: Invalid free by processing CNAME DNS record pointing to another CNAME record pointing to an empty A-record
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2011-4096
The idnsGrokReply function in Squid before 3.1.16 does not properly free memory, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon abort) via a DNS reply containing a CNAME record that references another CNAME record that contains an empty A record. La función idnsGrokReply en Squid anterior a v3.1.16 no adecuada de memoria libre, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (daemon abortar) a través de una respuesta DNS que contiene un registro CNAME que hace referencia a otro registro CNAME y este contiene un registro vacío. • http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3237#c12 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://secunia.com/advisories/46609 http://secunia.com/advisories/47459 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:193 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/10/31/5 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/01/3 http://www.redhat.com& • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors •
CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 94%CPEs: 71EXPL: 0CVE-2011-3205 – squid: buffer overflow flaw in Squid's Gopher reply parser (SQUID-2011:3)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2011-3205
Buffer overflow in the gopherToHTML function in gopher.cc in the Gopher reply parser in Squid 3.0 before 3.0.STABLE26, 3.1 before 3.1.15, and 3.2 before 3.2.0.11 allows remote Gopher servers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and daemon restart) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a long line in a response. NOTE: This issue exists because of a CVE-2005-0094 regression. Desbordamiento de búfer en la v3.0 anterior a v3.0.STABLE26, v3.1 anterior a v3.1.15, y v3.2 anterior a v3.2.0.11 permite a servidores remotos Gopher provocar una denegación de servicio (corrupción de memoria y reinicio del demonio) o posiblemente tener un impacto no especificado a través de una respuesta demasiado larga. NOTA: Este problema existe debido a una regresión de CVE-2005-0094. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-September/065534.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-09/msg00012.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-09/msg00013.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/08/29/2 http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/08/30/4 http: •