CVSS: 8.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 53EXPL: 0CVE-2017-10116 – OpenJDK: LDAPCertStore following referrals to non-LDAP URLs (Security, 8176067)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-10116
Vulnerability in the Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: Security). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 6u151, 7u141 and 8u131; Java SE Embedded: 8u131; JRockit: R28.3.14. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit. • http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3919 http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3954 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99734 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038931 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1789 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1790 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1791 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1792 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA& •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 27%CPEs: 39EXPL: 0CVE-2017-7668 – httpd: ap_find_token() buffer overread
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-7668
The HTTP strict parsing changes added in Apache httpd 2.2.32 and 2.4.24 introduced a bug in token list parsing, which allows ap_find_token() to search past the end of its input string. By maliciously crafting a sequence of request headers, an attacker may be able to cause a segmentation fault, or to force ap_find_token() to return an incorrect value. Los cambios en el análisis sintáctico estricto de HTTP añadidos en las versiones 2.2.32 y 2.4.24 de Apache httpd introdujeron un error en el análisis de listas de tokens. Esto permite que ap_find_token() busque más allá del final de la cadena de entrada. Un atacante puede conseguir causar un fallo de segmentación o forzar a que ap_find_token() devuelva un valor incorrecto mediante la manipulación de una secuencia de cabeceras de peticiones con fines maliciosos. • http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3896 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99137 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038711 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2479 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2483 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3193 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3194 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/55a068b6a5eec0b3198ae7d96a7cb412352d0ffa7716612c5af3745b%40%3Cdev.httpd. • CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read CWE-126: Buffer Over-read •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 35EXPL: 0CVE-2017-3167 – httpd: ap_get_basic_auth_pw() authentication bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-3167
In Apache httpd 2.2.x before 2.2.33 and 2.4.x before 2.4.26, use of the ap_get_basic_auth_pw() by third-party modules outside of the authentication phase may lead to authentication requirements being bypassed. En Apache httpd, en versiones 2.2.x anteriores a la 2.2.33 y versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.26, el uso de ap_get_basic_auth_pw() por parte de módulos de terceros fuera de la fase de autenticación puede dar lugar a que se omitan requisitos de autenticación.. It was discovered that the use of httpd's ap_get_basic_auth_pw() API function outside of the authentication phase could lead to authentication bypass. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to bypass required authentication if the API was used incorrectly by one of the modules used by httpd. • http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3896 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99135 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038711 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2478 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2479 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2483 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3193 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3194 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHS • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4341
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4341
NetApp Clustered Data ONTAP before 8.3.2P7 allows remote attackers to obtain SMB share information via unspecified vectors. NetApp Clustered Data ONTAP en versiones anteriores a 8.3.2P7 permite a atacantes remotos obtener información compartida SMB a través de vectores no especificados. • https://kb.netapp.com/support/s/article/NTAP-20161028-0001 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 52%CPEs: 87EXPL: 1CVE-2016-8610 – SSL/TLS: Malformed plain-text ALERT packets could cause remote DoS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-8610
A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients. Se ha encontrado un fallo de denegación de servicio en OpenSSL en las versiones 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 hasta la 1.0.2h y la 1.1.0 en la forma en la que el protocolo TLS/SSL definió el procesamiento de paquetes ALERT durante una negociación de conexión. Un atacante remoto podría emplear este fallo para hacer que un servidor TLS/SSL consuma una cantidad excesiva de recursos de CPU y fracase a la hora de aceptar conexiones de otros clientes. A denial of service flaw was found in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. • https://github.com/cujanovic/CVE-2016-8610-PoC http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0286.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0574.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1415.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1659.html http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/224 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93841 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037084 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1413 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1414 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •