CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 8%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0CVE-2010-0433 – openssl: crash caused by a missing krb5_sname_to_principal() return value check
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2010-0433
The kssl_keytab_is_available function in ssl/kssl.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8n, when Kerberos is enabled but Kerberos configuration files cannot be opened, does not check a certain return value, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) via SSL cipher negotiation, as demonstrated by a chroot installation of Dovecot or stunnel without Kerberos configuration files inside the chroot. La funcion kssl_keytab_is_available en ssl/kssl.c en OpenSSL before v0.9.8n, cuando Kerberos esta activo pero los ficheros de configuracion de Kerberos no pueden ser abiertos, no comprueba adecuadamente cierto valor de retorno, lo que permite a atacantes remotos producir una denegacion de servicio (desreferencia a puntero nulo y caida de demonio) a traves de la negociacion del cifrado SSL, lo que se demuestra mediante la instalacion chroot de Dovecot o stunnel sin los ficheros de configuracion de Kerberos dentro de chroot. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory.asc http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=19374 http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.openssl.users/browse_thread/thread/c3e1ab0034ca4b4c/66aa896c3a78b2f7 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-April/038587.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-April/039561.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=127128920008563&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=127557640302499&w=2 http://secunia.com& • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 13EXPL: 0CVE-2009-3245 – openssl: missing bn_wexpand return value checks
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-3245
OpenSSL before 0.9.8m does not check for a NULL return value from bn_wexpand function calls in (1) crypto/bn/bn_div.c, (2) crypto/bn/bn_gf2m.c, (3) crypto/ec/ec2_smpl.c, and (4) engines/e_ubsec.c, which has unspecified impact and context-dependent attack vectors. OpenSSL en versiones anterioes a v0.9.8m cuando recibe un valor de retorno NULL de la funcion bn_wexpand hace una llamada a (1) crypto/bn/bn_div.c, (2) crypto/bn/bn_gf2m.c, (3) crypto/ec/ec2_smpl.c, y (4) engines/e_ubsec.c, lo que tiene un impacto inespecifico y vectores de ataque dependientes del contexto. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory.asc http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2011//Jun/msg00000.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-April/038587.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-April/039561.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-06/msg00001.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=127128920008563&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=127678688104458&w=2 http://ma • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 20%CPEs: 71EXPL: 0CVE-2009-4355 – openssl significant memory leak in certain SSLv3 requests (DoS)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-4355
Memory leak in the zlib_stateful_finish function in crypto/comp/c_zlib.c in OpenSSL 0.9.8l and earlier and 1.0.0 Beta through Beta 4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via vectors that trigger incorrect calls to the CRYPTO_cleanup_all_ex_data function, as demonstrated by use of SSLv3 and PHP with the Apache HTTP Server, a related issue to CVE-2008-1678. Fuga de memoria en la función zlib_stateful_finish en crypto/comp/c_zlib.c en OpenSSL v0.9.8l y anteriores, y v1.0.0 Beta a la Beta 4, permite a atacantes remoso provocar una denegación de servicio (consumo de memoria) a través de vectores que provocan llamadas incorrectas a la función CRYPTO_free_all_ex_data, como se demostró usando SSLv3 y PHP con el Apache HTTP Server, una cuestión relacionada con el CVE-2008-1678. • http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=19068 http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=19069 http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=19167 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-April/038587.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-April/039561.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-01/msg00009.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=127128920008563&w=2 http://secunia.com/advisories/38175 http://secunia.com/advisories/38181 http: • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 21EXPL: 5CVE-2009-3555 – Mozilla NSS - NULL Character CA SSL Certificate Validation Security Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-3555
The TLS protocol, and the SSL protocol 3.0 and possibly earlier, as used in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.0, mod_ssl in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.14 and earlier, OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, GnuTLS 2.8.5 and earlier, Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.12.4 and earlier, multiple Cisco products, and other products, does not properly associate renegotiation handshakes with an existing connection, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to insert data into HTTPS sessions, and possibly other types of sessions protected by TLS or SSL, by sending an unauthenticated request that is processed retroactively by a server in a post-renegotiation context, related to a "plaintext injection" attack, aka the "Project Mogul" issue. El protocolo TLS y el protocolo SSL v3.0 y posiblemente versiones anteriores, tal y como se usa en Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) v7.0, mod_ssl en el servidor HTTP Apache v2.2.14 y anteriores, OpenSSL antes de v0.9.8l, GnuTLS v2.8.5 y anteriores, Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) v3.12.4 y anteriores, y otros productos, no asocia apropiadamente la renegociación del Handshake SSL en una conexión existente, lo que permite ataques man-in-the-middle en los que el atacante inserta datos en sesiones HTTPS, y posiblemente otro tipo de sesiones protegidas por SSL o TLS, enviando una petición de autenticación que es procesada retroactivamente por un servidor en un contexto post-renegociación. Se trata de un ataque de "inyección de texto plano", también conocido como el problema del "Proyecto Mogul". • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/10071 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/10579 http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-11/0120.html http://blog.g-sec.lu/2009/11/tls-sslv3-renegotiation-vulnerability.html http://blogs.iss.net/archive/sslmitmiscsrf.html http://blogs.sun.com/security/entry/vulnerability_in_tls_protocol_during http://clicky.me/tlsvuln http://extendedsubset.com/?p=8 http://extendedsubset.com/Renegotiating_TLS.pdf http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsuppo • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation CWE-300: Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint •
CVSS: 5.1EPSS: 1%CPEs: 161EXPL: 0CVE-2009-2409 – deprecate MD2 in SSL cert validation (Kaminsky)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-2409
The Network Security Services (NSS) library before 3.12.3, as used in Firefox; GnuTLS before 2.6.4 and 2.7.4; OpenSSL 0.9.8 through 0.9.8k; and other products support MD2 with X.509 certificates, which might allow remote attackers to spoof certificates by using MD2 design flaws to generate a hash collision in less than brute-force time. NOTE: the scope of this issue is currently limited because the amount of computation required is still large. La librería Network Security Services (NSS) en versiones anteriores a 3.12.3, como se utiliza en Firefox; GnuTLS en versiones anteriores a 2.6.4 y 2.7.4; OpenSSL 0.9.8 hasta la versión 0.9.8k; y otros productos que soportan MD2 con certificados X.509, lo que podrían permitir a atacantes remotos falsificar certificados usando defectos de diseño de MD2 para generar una colisión de hash en menos que tiempo que con fuerza bruta. NOTA: el alcance de este problema está actualmente limitado porque la cantidad de computación requerida es todavía grande. • http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/ReleaseNotes.html http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/6u17.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2009/Nov/msg00000.html http://secunia.com/advisories/36139 http://secunia.com/advisories/36157 http://secunia.com/advisories/36434 http://secunia.com/advisories/36669 http://secunia.com/advisories/36739 http://secunia.com/advisories/37386 http://secunia.com/advisories/42467 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200911-02.x • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •