CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 56%CPEs: 45EXPL: 0CVE-2015-1788
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-1788
The BN_GF2m_mod_inv function in crypto/bn/bn_gf2m.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8s, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0e, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1n, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2b does not properly handle ECParameters structures in which the curve is over a malformed binary polynomial field, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a session that uses an Elliptic Curve algorithm, as demonstrated by an attack against a server that supports client authentication. La función BN_GF2m_mod_inv en crypto/bn/bn_gf2m.c en OpenSSL anterior a 0.9.8s, 1.0.0 anterior a 1.0.0e, 1.0.1 anterior a 1.0.1n, y 1.0.2 anterior a 1.0.2b no maneja correctamente las estructuras ECParameters en las cuales la curva está por un campo polinomio binario malformado, lo que permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (bucle infinito) a través de una sesión que utiliza un algoritmo Elliptic Curve, tal y como fue demostrado mediante un ataque sobre un servidor que soporta la autenticación de clientes. • http://fortiguard.com/advisory/2015-07-09-cve-2015-1793-openssl-alternative-chains-certificate-forgery http://fortiguard.com/advisory/openssl-vulnerabilities-june-2015 http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2015-008.txt.asc http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10694 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Aug/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00023.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce&#x • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 62%CPEs: 45EXPL: 0CVE-2015-1792 – OpenSSL: CMS verify infinite loop with unknown hash function
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-1792
The do_free_upto function in crypto/cms/cms_smime.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zg, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0s, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1n, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2b allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via vectors that trigger a NULL value of a BIO data structure, as demonstrated by an unrecognized X.660 OID for a hash function. La función do_free_upto en crypto/cms/cms_smime.c en OpenSSL anterior a 0.9.8zg, 1.0.0 anterior a 1.0.0s, 1.0.1 anterior a 1.0.1n, y 1.0.2 anterior a 1.0.2b permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (bucle infinito) a través de vectores que provocan un valor nulo de una estructura de datos BIO, tal y como fue demostrado mediante un X.660 OID no reconocido para una función hash. A denial of service flaw was found in the way OpenSSL verified certain signed messages using CMS (Cryptographic Message Syntax). A remote attacker could cause an application using OpenSSL to use excessive amounts of memory by sending a specially crafted message for verification. • http://fortiguard.com/advisory/openssl-vulnerabilities-june-2015 http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2015-008.txt.asc http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10694 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Aug/msg00001.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-June/160436.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-June/160647.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00023 • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') •
CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 39%CPEs: 45EXPL: 0CVE-2015-1791 – OpenSSL: Race condition handling NewSessionTicket
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-1791
Race condition in the ssl3_get_new_session_ticket function in ssl/s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zg, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0s, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1n, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2b, when used for a multi-threaded client, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (double free and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact by providing a NewSessionTicket during an attempt to reuse a ticket that had been obtained earlier. Condición de carrera en la función ssl3_get_new_session_ticket en ssl/s3_clnt.c en OpenSSL anterior a 0.9.8zg, 1.0.0 anterior a 1.0.0s, 1.0.1 anterior a 1.0.1n, y 1.0.2 anterior a 1.0.2b, cuando utilizado para un cliente multi-hilo, permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (liberación doble y caída de aplicación) o posiblemente tener otro impacto no especificado mediante la provisión de un NewSessionTicket durante un intento de reutilizar un ticket que se había conseguido anteriormente. A race condition was found in the session handling code of OpenSSL. This issue could possibly cause a multi-threaded TLS/SSL client using OpenSSL to double free session ticket data and crash. • http://fortiguard.com/advisory/openssl-vulnerabilities-june-2015 http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2015-008.txt.asc http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10694 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10733 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Aug/msg00001.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-June/160436.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-June/160647.html http& • CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 97%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2015-4000 – LOGJAM: TLS connections which support export grade DHE key-exchange are vulnerable to MITM attacks
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-4000
The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue. El protocolo TLS 1.2 y anteriores, cuando una suite de cifrado DHE_EXPORT está habilitada en un servidor pero no en un cliente, no transporta una elección DHE_EXPORT, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle realizar ataques de degradación del cifrado mediante la rescritura de un ClientHello con DHE remplazado por DHE_EXPORT y posteriormente la rescritura de un ServerHello con DHE_EXPORT remplazado por DHE, también conocido como el problema 'Logjam'. A flaw was found in the way the TLS protocol composes the Diffie-Hellman exchange (for both export and non-export grade cipher suites). An attacker could use this flaw to downgrade a DHE connection to use export-grade key sizes, which could then be broken by sufficient pre-computation. This can lead to a passive man-in-the-middle attack in which the attacker is able to decrypt all traffic. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/sendmail_advisory2.asc http://fortiguard.com/advisory/2015-07-09-cve-2015-1793-openssl-alternative-chains-certificate-forgery http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2015-008.txt.asc http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04876402 http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04949778 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10681 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoC • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 46%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2015-0207
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-0207
The dtls1_listen function in d1_lib.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a does not properly isolate the state information of independent data streams, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via crafted DTLS traffic, as demonstrated by DTLS 1.0 traffic to a DTLS 1.2 server. La función dtls1_listen en d1_lib.c en OpenSSL 1.0.2 anterior a 1.0.2a no aísla correctamente la información de estado de flujos de datos independientes, lo que permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (caída de aplicación) a través de trafico DTLS manipulado, tal y como fue demostrado por trafico DTLS 1.0 hacia un servidor DTLS 1.2. • http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143748090628601&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050155601375&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050297101809&w=2 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2015-2511959.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2016-2367955.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujul2015-2367936.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/s •