Page 16 of 1161 results (0.013 seconds)

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 82%CPEs: 55EXPL: 0

Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una inundación de reinicio, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. El atacante abre una serie de secuencias y envía una solicitud no válida sobre cada secuencia que debería solicitar una secuencia de tramas RST_STREAM del par. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00076.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

In ghostscript before version 9.50, the .buildfont1 procedure did not properly secure its privileged calls, enabling scripts to bypass `-dSAFER` restrictions. An attacker could abuse this flaw by creating a specially crafted PostScript file that could escalate privileges and access files outside of restricted areas. En ghostscript anterior a la versión 9.50, el procedimiento .buildfont1 no aseguraba adecuadamente sus llamadas privilegiadas, permitiendo que los scripts eludieran las restricciones `-dSAFER`. Un atacante podría abusar de esta fallo al crear un archivo PostScript especialmente diseñado que podría escalar privilegios y acceder a archivos fuera de las áreas restringidas. It was found that the .buildfont1 procedure did not properly secure its privileged calls, enabling scripts to bypass `-dSAFER` restrictions. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=5b85ddd19 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10216 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202004-03 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-10216 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1737080 • CWE-648: Incorrect Use of Privileged APIs •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 26EXPL: 1

An information disclosure vulnerability exists when certain central processing units (CPU) speculatively access memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could read privileged data across trust boundaries. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted application. The vulnerability would not allow an attacker to elevate user rights directly, but it could be used to obtain information that could be used to try to compromise the affected system further. On January 3, 2018, Microsoft released an advisory and security updates related to a newly-discovered class of hardware vulnerabilities (known as Spectre) involving speculative execution side channels that affect AMD, ARM, and Intel CPUs to varying degrees. This vulnerability, released on August 6, 2019, is a variant of the Spectre Variant 1 speculative execution side channel vulnerability and has been assigned CVE-2019-1125. Microsoft released a security update on July 9, 2019 that addresses the vulnerability through a software change that mitigates how the CPU speculatively accesses memory. Note that this vulnerability does not require a microcode update from your device OEM. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/48071 http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/156337/SWAPGS-Attack-Proof-Of-Concept.html http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20200408-01-swapgs-en https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:2824 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3248 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2600 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2609 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2695 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHS • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 1

In KDE Frameworks KConfig before 5.61.0, malicious desktop files and configuration files lead to code execution with minimal user interaction. This relates to libKF5ConfigCore.so, and the mishandling of .desktop and .directory files, as demonstrated by a shell command on an Icon line in a .desktop file. En KDE Frameworks KConfig en versiones anteriores a 5.61.0, los archivos de escritorio y los archivos de configuración maliciosos conllevan a la ejecución de código con una interacción mínima del usuario. Esto se relaciona con el archivo libKF5ConfigCore.so y el manejo inapropiado de archivos .desktop y .directory, como es demostrado por un comando de shell en una línea Icon en un archivo .desktop. A flaw was found in the KDE Frameworks KConfig prior to version 5.61.0. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00013.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00016.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00034.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153981/Slackware-Security-Advisory-kdelibs-Updates.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2606 https://gist.githubusercontent.com/zeropwn/630832df151029cb8f22d5b6b9efaefb/raw/64aa3d30279acb207f787ce9c135eefd5e52643b/kde-kdesktopfile-command-injection.txt https://lists.deb • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') CWE-454: External Initialization of Trusted Variables or Data Stores •

CVSS: 8.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0

It was found that icedtea-web though 1.7.2 and 1.8.2 did not properly sanitize paths from <jar/> elements in JNLP files. An attacker could trick a victim into running a specially crafted application and use this flaw to upload arbitrary files to arbitrary locations in the context of the user. Se descubrió que icedtea-web, aunque 1.7.2 y 1.8.2 no desinfectaban correctamente las rutas de los elementos en los archivos JNLP. Un atacante podría engañar a una víctima para que ejecute una aplicación especialmente diseñada y usar esta fallo para cargar archivos arbitrarios en ubicaciones arbitrarias en el contexto del usuario. It was found that icedtea-web did not properly sanitize paths from <jar/> elements in JNLP files. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00045.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154748/IcedTeaWeb-Validation-Bypass-Directory-Traversal-Code-Execution.html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10182 https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/IcedTea-Web/issues/327 https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/IcedTea-Web/pull/344 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/09/msg00008.html https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Oct/5 https://access.redhat.com/security/cv • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •