Page 16 of 166 results (0.023 seconds)

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0

It was discovered that EAP packages in certain versions of Red Hat Enterprise Linux use incorrect permissions for /etc/sysconfig/jbossas configuration files. The file is writable to jboss group (root:jboss, 664). On systems using classic /etc/init.d init scripts (i.e. on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and earlier), the file is sourced by the jboss init script and its content executed with root privileges when jboss service is started, stopped, or restarted. Se ha descubierto que los paquetes EAP en ciertas versiones de Red Hat Enterprise Linux emplean permisos incorrectos para los archivo de configuración /etc/sysconfig/jbossas. El archivo puede escribirse en el grupo jboss (root:jboss, 664). • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0826.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0827.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0828.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0829.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96896 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1609 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-8657 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-8657 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400343 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls CWE-732: Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

Jboss jbossas before versions 5.2.0-23, 6.4.13, 7.0.5 is vulnerable to an unsafe file handling in the jboss init script which could result in local privilege escalation. Jboss jbossas en versiones anteriores a la 5.2.0-23, 6.4.13 y 7.0.5 es vulnerable a una gestión insegura de archivos en el script init de jboss, lo que podría resultar en un escalado de privilegios local. It was discovered that the jboss init script performed unsafe file handling which could result in local privilege escalation. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0244.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0245.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0246.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0250.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0831.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0832.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0834.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96035 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3454 https://access.redhat.com/e • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls CWE-284: Improper Access Control •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 52%CPEs: 87EXPL: 1

A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients. Se ha encontrado un fallo de denegación de servicio en OpenSSL en las versiones 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 hasta la 1.0.2h y la 1.1.0 en la forma en la que el protocolo TLS/SSL definió el procesamiento de paquetes ALERT durante una negociación de conexión. Un atacante remoto podría emplear este fallo para hacer que un servidor TLS/SSL consuma una cantidad excesiva de recursos de CPU y fracase a la hora de aceptar conexiones de otros clientes. A denial of service flaw was found in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. • https://github.com/cujanovic/CVE-2016-8610-PoC http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0286.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0574.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1415.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1659.html http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/224 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93841 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037084 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1413 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1414 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 34EXPL: 0

A malicious web application running on Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M9, 8.5.0 to 8.5.4, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.36, 7.0.0 to 7.0.70 and 6.0.0 to 6.0.45 was able to bypass a configured SecurityManager via manipulation of the configuration parameters for the JSP Servlet. Una aplicación web maliciosa en Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 a 9.0.0.M9, 8.5.0 a 8.5.4, 8.0.0.RC1 a 8.0.36, 7.0.0 a 7.0.70, y 6.0.0 a 6.0.45 era capaz de eludir un SecurityManager configurado mediante la manipulación de los parámetros de configuración para el Servlet JSP. It was discovered that a malicious web application could bypass a configured SecurityManager via manipulation of the configuration parameters for the JSP Servlet. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0457.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1551.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3720 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93944 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037141 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038757 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0455 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0456 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1548 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1549 https:/& •

CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 33EXPL: 1

In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M9, 8.5.0 to 8.5.4, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.36, 7.0.0 to 7.0.70 and 6.0.0 to 6.0.45 a malicious web application was able to bypass a configured SecurityManager via a Tomcat utility method that was accessible to web applications. En Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 a 9.0.0.M9, 8.5.0 a 8.5.4, 8.0.0.RC1 a 8.0.36, 7.0.0 a 7.0.70, y 6.0.0 a 6.0.45 una aplicación web maliciosa era capaz de omitir un SecurityManager configurado mediante un método utility Tomcat accesible para las aplicaciones web. It was discovered that a malicious web application could bypass a configured SecurityManager via a Tomcat utility method that was accessible to web applications. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155873/Tomcat-9.0.0.M1-Sandbox-Escape.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0457.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1551.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3720 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93942 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037142 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038757 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0455 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0456 https://access.redhat.com/err •