CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 59%CPEs: 143EXPL: 0CVE-2016-2571 – squid: wrong error handling for malformed HTTP responses
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2571
http.cc in Squid 3.x before 3.5.15 and 4.x before 4.0.7 proceeds with the storage of certain data after a response-parsing failure, which allows remote HTTP servers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a malformed response. http.cc en Squid 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.15 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.7 procede con el almacenamiento de ciertos datos después de un fallo de respuesta de análisis, lo que permite a servidores HTTP remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (fallo de aserción y salida de demonio) a través de una respuesta mal formada. It was found that squid did not properly handle errors when failing to parse an HTTP response, possibly leading to an assertion failure. A malicious HTTP server could use this flaw to crash squid using a specially crafted HTTP response. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2600.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3522 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/02/26/2 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035101 http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2016_2.txt http://www.s • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-228: Improper Handling of Syntactically Invalid Structure •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 67%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0CVE-2016-2572 – squid: wrong error handling for malformed HTTP responses
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2572
http.cc in Squid 4.x before 4.0.7 relies on the HTTP status code after a response-parsing failure, which allows remote HTTP servers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a malformed response. http.cc en Squid 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.7 confía en el código de estado HTTP después de un fallo de respuesta de análisis, lo que permite a servidores HTTP remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (fallo de aserción y salida de demonio) a través de una respuesta mal formada. It was found that squid did not properly handle errors when failing to parse an HTTP response, possibly leading to an assertion failure. A malicious HTTP server could use this flaw to crash squid using a specially crafted HTTP response. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2600.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/02/26/2 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035101 http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2016_2.txt http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v4/changesets/squid-4-14548 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-228: Improper Handling of Syntactically Invalid Structure •
CVSS: 4.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0CVE-2014-9749
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-9749
Squid 3.4.4 through 3.4.11 and 3.5.0.1 through 3.5.1, when Digest authentication is used, allow remote authenticated users to retain access by leveraging a stale nonce, aka "Nonce replay vulnerability." Squid 3.4.4 hasta la versión 3.4.11 y 3.5.0.1 hasta la versión 3.5.1, cuando es utilizada la autenticación Digest, permiten a usuarios remotos autenticados retener el acceso aprovechando un nonce caducado, también conocido como 'Nonce replay vulnerability'. • http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4066 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-10/msg00052.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/10/01/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/10/11/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/10/12/2 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •
CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 4CVE-2015-5400
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-5400
Squid before 3.5.6 does not properly handle CONNECT method peer responses when configured with cache_peer, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended restrictions and gain access to a backend proxy via a CONNECT request. Vulnerabilidad en Squid en versiones anteriores a 3.5.6, no maneja adecuadamente las respuestas de pares del método CONNECT cuando se configura con cache_peer, lo que permite a atacantes remotos eludir las restricciones previstas y obtener acceso a un proxy backend a través de una solicitud CONNECT. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/183598.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3327 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/07/06/8 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/07/09/12 http://www.openwall.com/lists&# • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 73EXPL: 0CVE-2015-3455 – squid: incorrect X509 server certificate validation (SQUID-2015:1)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3455
Squid 3.2.x before 3.2.14, 3.3.x before 3.3.14, 3.4.x before 3.4.13, and 3.5.x before 3.5.4, when configured with client-first SSL-bump, do not properly validate the domain or hostname fields of X.509 certificates, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via a valid certificate. Squid 3.2.x en versiones anteriores a 3.2.14, 3.3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.3.14, 3.4.x en versiones anteriores a 3.4.13 y 3.5.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.4, cuando el primer cliente está configurado mediante SSL-bump, no valida adecuadamente el dominio o campos de nombre de host de certificados X.509, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle suplantar servidores SSL a través de un certificado válido. It was found that Squid configured with client-first SSL-bump did not correctly validate X.509 server certificate host name fields. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to spoof a Squid server using a specially crafted X.509 certificate. • http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2015-0191.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/183598.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-09/msg00016.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2378.html http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:230 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjul2015-2511963.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security&# • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-297: Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch •