CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2017-3736 – openssl: bn_sqrx8x_internal carry bug on x86_64
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-3736
There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure in OpenSSL before 1.0.2m and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0g. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101666 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039727 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0998 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2185 https://access.redhat.co • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-682: Incorrect Calculation •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 2%CPEs: 102EXPL: 0CVE-2017-3735 – openssl: Malformed X.509 IPAdressFamily could cause OOB read
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-3735
While parsing an IPAddressFamily extension in an X.509 certificate, it is possible to do a one-byte overread. This would result in an incorrect text display of the certificate. This bug has been present since 2006 and is present in all versions of OpenSSL before 1.0.2m and 1.1.0g. Al analizar una extensión IPAddressFamily en un certificado X.509, es posible realizar una sobrelectura de un bit. Esto tendría como resultado que el texto del certificado se muestre de forma incorrecta. • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100515 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039726 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3221 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3505 https://cert-portal.siem • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2017-3733 – Encrypt-Then-Mac renegotiation crash
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-3733
During a renegotiation handshake if the Encrypt-Then-Mac extension is negotiated where it was not in the original handshake (or vice-versa) then this can cause OpenSSL 1.1.0 before 1.1.0e to crash (dependent on ciphersuite). Both clients and servers are affected. Durante un protocolo de enlace de renegociación, si la extensión Encrypt-Then-Mac es negociada cuando no estaba en el protocolo de enlace original (o viceversa), se podría provocar el cierre inesperado de OpenSSL (dependiente de una suite de cifrado) en versiones 1.1.0 anteriores a la 1.1.0e. Tanto los clientes como los servidores se ven afectados. • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96269 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037846 https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4ad93618d26a3ea23d36ad5498ff4f59eff3a4d2 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbgn03728en_us https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20170216.txt https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory& • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2016-7056 – openssl: ECDSA P-256 timing attack key recovery
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-7056
A timing attack flaw was found in OpenSSL 1.0.1u and before that could allow a malicious user with local access to recover ECDSA P-256 private keys. Se ha encontrado un error de ataque de sincronización en OpenSSL, en versiones 1.0.1u y anteriores, que podría permitir que un usuario malicioso con acceso local recupere claves privadas ECDSA P-256 A timing attack flaw was found in OpenSSL that could allow a malicious user with local access to recover ECDSA P-256 private keys. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1415.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95375 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037575 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1413 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1414 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1801 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1802 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-7056 https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/1195 https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/5.9/ • CWE-320: Key Management Errors CWE-385: Covert Timing Channel •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 52%CPEs: 87EXPL: 1CVE-2016-8610 – SSL/TLS: Malformed plain-text ALERT packets could cause remote DoS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-8610
A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients. Se ha encontrado un fallo de denegación de servicio en OpenSSL en las versiones 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 hasta la 1.0.2h y la 1.1.0 en la forma en la que el protocolo TLS/SSL definió el procesamiento de paquetes ALERT durante una negociación de conexión. Un atacante remoto podría emplear este fallo para hacer que un servidor TLS/SSL consuma una cantidad excesiva de recursos de CPU y fracase a la hora de aceptar conexiones de otros clientes. A denial of service flaw was found in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. • https://github.com/cujanovic/CVE-2016-8610-PoC http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0286.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0574.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1415.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1659.html http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/224 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93841 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037084 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1413 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1414 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •